u**c
发帖数: 17972 | 1 我看不一定。
因为资本总是向成本最低的地方流动，大公司手里钱多了就去东亚投资了，资本回报率
更高 |
l**********3
发帖数: 10970 | |
B******e
发帖数: 16928 | 3 lower tax would cause the difference to decrease for sure because you have
to face political risk, rising labor cost, shipping cost, etc. There is also
a risk-return tradeoff, with more offshore leading to more risk.
【在 u**c 的大作中提到】
: 我看不一定。
: 因为资本总是向成本最低的地方流动，大公司手里钱多了就去东亚投资了，资本回报率
: 更高
|
u**c
发帖数: 17972 | 4 共产党可是比共和党还要右的多的政党，
资本在中国基本是如鱼得水毫无限制，工厂死了人花了十万二十万人民币就打发了，
这个低人权优势欧美国家远远赶不上
also
【在 B******e 的大作中提到】
: lower tax would cause the difference to decrease for sure because you have
: to face political risk, rising labor cost, shipping cost, etc. There is also
: a risk-return tradeoff, with more offshore leading to more risk.
|
C****n
发帖数: 2324 | 5 You're right.
But invest in China will create jobs in USA too. My company is a typical
sample. We hire a lot people here in USA, as well a lot people in China.
If we DO not invest in China, our business model won't work, nobody has a
job.
Be it the same for MSFT, Google, IBM.
You think you moved some jobs to China, but you create more jobs in USA. If
you do not allow these corporation move jobs to China, then the company will
shrink, it will actually lose jobs in USA, and eventually, may bankrupt,
thus lost all jobs in USA.
Bottom line, outsourcing will increase the competency of US companies, or
else, it will lose in this global business war. Because if you don't do it,
somebody else will! Be it Japan, Europe .... etc.
【在 u**c 的大作中提到】
: 我看不一定。
: 因为资本总是向成本最低的地方流动，大公司手里钱多了就去东亚投资了，资本回报率
: 更高
|
d*********2
发帖数: 48111 | 6 你真说对了， 大陆当年的吸引外资就是靠免税。
什么个燕京啤酒都跑卡曼去挂个壳。
【在 u**c 的大作中提到】
: 我看不一定。
: 因为资本总是向成本最低的地方流动，大公司手里钱多了就去东亚投资了，资本回报率
: 更高
|
B******e
发帖数: 16928 | 7 You cannot deny the fact that labor cost is rising dramatically in China.
Also outsource means more financing to set things up which may turn against
you during downturns. Research has shown that during financial crisis, firms
de-outsource dramatically. Also there are jobs that cannot be outsourced in
China, e.g., a lot of the service sector as well as sophisticated equipment
that cannot be made in China because Chinese lack the technical know-how.
【在 u**c 的大作中提到】
: 共产党可是比共和党还要右的多的政党，
: 资本在中国基本是如鱼得水毫无限制，工厂死了人花了十万二十万人民币就打发了，
: 这个低人权优势欧美国家远远赶不上
:
: also
|
N********n
发帖数: 8363 | 8
That's why you need drop the lunatic minimum wage which is Democrooks'
favorite. Let companies hire people at market rate so that the jobs
are kept here. Once people learn the skills and have some experience
they can then move to jobs that are paid better.
【在 u**c 的大作中提到】
: 共产党可是比共和党还要右的多的政党，
: 资本在中国基本是如鱼得水毫无限制，工厂死了人花了十万二十万人民币就打发了，
: 这个低人权优势欧美国家远远赶不上
:
: also
|
t**********3
发帖数: 12623 | 9 the button line is:
keeping the capital in market place, which always generates economic
activities and grows businesses
vs.
(money) being taken by the government to fund government overspending
【在 u**c 的大作中提到】
: 我看不一定。
: 因为资本总是向成本最低的地方流动，大公司手里钱多了就去东亚投资了，资本回报率
: 更高
|
t**********3
发帖数: 12623 | 10 the unions drive up labor cost in the US
the government drives up inflation
"the real minimum wage is zero" - Thomas Sowell
we need baseline budgeting for the government and baseline competition in
the market place
【在 N********n 的大作中提到】
:
: That's why you need drop the lunatic minimum wage which is Democrooks'
: favorite. Let companies hire people at market rate so that the jobs
: are kept here. Once people learn the skills and have some experience
: they can then move to jobs that are paid better.
|
