t*a
发帖数: 18880 | 1 Bad crash test scores sink 3 Toyota vehicles
"The Camry, RAV4 and the Prius V"
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2013/10/28/toyota-camr
"Consumer Reports" drops Camry, RAV4, Prius V for "poor" crash test scores.
CEN1319_03
(Photo: IIHS)
Story Highlights
'Consumer Reports' drops Camry, RAV4, Prius V from 'recommended' status
The three Toyotas score 'poor' in narrow frontal crash test
'CR' will no longer recommend cars that score so low
SHARE 47 CONNECT 6 TWEET 7 COMMENTEMAILMORE
Consumer Reports has dumped three of Toyota's best-known important models
from its "recommended" list because of bad crash test scores.
The Camry, RAV4 and the Prius V all lost CR "recommended" status after
scoring "poor" in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's new tough
narrow-offset front crash test. The score also dropped the Audi A4 off CR's
list. The "poor" score in the test equates with a strong likelihood of
severe or life-threatening injury.
Word that the three Toyotas were off the much-watched CR list came the same
day Toyota overall was being lauded by CR for its lineup's reliability. Ten
of the highest-scoring models for predicted reliability were Toyotas, and
the brand rated second overall.
RELIABILITY : Lexus is the most reliable car brand, according to Consumer
Reports
The IIHS narrow-offset crash test that doomed the three models simulates a
car hitting a pole or another vehicle with 25% of the front area on the
driver side. IIHS says the test reflects many real-world accidents.
CRASH TEST: Watching Acura MDX smashed in brutal 'small overlap' test
CR says it tried to be fair before taking the models off the "recommended"
list. When IIHS first began doing the test last year, many models failed,
but now there are only a handful, says Jake Fisher, who heads CR's auto
testing. "Every other family sedan has done better" than Camry, he says.
Toyota is making improvements to the Camry, and it is likely to be retested
soon, so it has fair shot to regain "recommended" status.
The test has tripped up a number of automakers because unlike front, rear
and rollover crash tests, they haven't had many years to design cars to
specifically pass it.
"This is a tricky situation because when Consumer Reports pulls its
recommendation it gives the appearance that these models are suddenly 'less
safe' than they used to be. That's not true at all," says Karl Brauer,
senior analyst for Kelley Blue Book. "What the new IIHS test has uncovered
is the next area for automakers to focus on based on crash test statistics." |
b******7
发帖数: 8200 | 2 这个级别的，钱放在那呢。
测测5W以上的，看看，尤其是LC200啥的。 |
t*a
发帖数: 18880 | 3 不如测测其他这个价位的车子，看看是不是都是渣...
【在 b******7 的大作中提到】
: 这个级别的，钱放在那呢。
: 测测5W以上的，看看，尤其是LC200啥的。
|
d******e
发帖数: 7844 | 4 只能说toyota能力不足，参见同等价位的Forester
【在 b******7 的大作中提到】
: 这个级别的，钱放在那呢。
: 测测5W以上的，看看，尤其是LC200啥的。
|
c*********r
发帖数: 19468 | 5 不是能力问题吧……意愿问题……看之前Camry之类的车型碰撞数据还能往回调，精确
压线，就知道了
这技术难度恐怕比Forester还得高……
买菜车品牌里还得说Subaru是业界良心……
【在 d******e 的大作中提到】
: 只能说toyota能力不足，参见同等价位的Forester
|
b******7
发帖数: 8200 | 6 碳大也粉速八？
碳大敢问开啥车啊，给兄弟们8一8. LOL
不说没事啊，纯好奇。
顺便扯远点儿，我认识个老大哥，平时开nissan，其实家里一个保时捷。北美这车便宜
的，大家车库里面没好车我的不信啊。
【在 c*********r 的大作中提到】
: 不是能力问题吧……意愿问题……看之前Camry之类的车型碰撞数据还能往回调，精确
: 压线，就知道了
: 这技术难度恐怕比Forester还得高……
: 买菜车品牌里还得说Subaru是业界良心……
|
y***g
发帖数: 10422 | 7 尻，我还以为又有新的测试结果出炉了。原来是老早的。。。
scores.
status
【在 t*a 的大作中提到】
: Bad crash test scores sink 3 Toyota vehicles
: "The Camry, RAV4 and the Prius V"
: http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2013/10/28/toyota-camr
: "Consumer Reports" drops Camry, RAV4, Prius V for "poor" crash test scores.
: CEN1319_03
: (Photo: IIHS)
: Story Highlights
: 'Consumer Reports' drops Camry, RAV4, Prius V from 'recommended' status
: The three Toyotas score 'poor' in narrow frontal crash test
: 'CR' will no longer recommend cars that score so low
|
y***g
发帖数: 10422 | 8 居然还能往回调而且调到精准压线。。。这一点确实应该问候丰田蟑螂它祖宗八代。。。
如果时间倒退到2007年，可能我还得说买菜车品牌里丰田是业界良心。。。当时Camry
确实做得非常好，部分指标超过Volvo。而且同平台的RX, Highlander, Venza也都不错。
反正以后别买丰田就是了。
【在 c*********r 的大作中提到】
: 不是能力问题吧……意愿问题……看之前Camry之类的车型碰撞数据还能往回调，精确
: 压线，就知道了
: 这技术难度恐怕比Forester还得高……
: 买菜车品牌里还得说Subaru是业界良心……
|
u*******r
发帖数: 2855 | 9 what about lexus?
。。
Camry
错。
【在 y***g 的大作中提到】
: 居然还能往回调而且调到精准压线。。。这一点确实应该问候丰田蟑螂它祖宗八代。。。
: 如果时间倒退到2007年，可能我还得说买菜车品牌里丰田是业界良心。。。当时Camry
: 确实做得非常好，部分指标超过Volvo。而且同平台的RX, Highlander, Venza也都不错。
: 反正以后别买丰田就是了。
|
c*********r
发帖数: 19468 | 10 still typical Toyota...
【在 u*******r 的大作中提到】
: what about lexus?
:
: 。。
: Camry
: 错。
|
t*a
发帖数: 18880 | 11 没仔细读,也以为是新的结果呢...
【在 y***g 的大作中提到】
: 尻，我还以为又有新的测试结果出炉了。原来是老早的。。。
:
: scores.
: status
|
