l********g 发帖数: 7 | 1 本人10月26日递交EB1A, 后过了一个月追加PP, 结果不幸遇到0454,质疑引用未过1000
.承认了发表的文章,承认了review其他人的paper,质疑contribution。原话是:“
upon examining your citation history,we have concluded that, while your
research demonstrates original contributions in the field, the number of
citations of your work, when compared with that of the very top scientists
in the field, whose publications(according to google scholar) have garnered
citations numbered the thousands, dose not establish contributions of major
significance in the field”
本人情况:
文章:21篇,一作7篇,一作有两篇IF>10,是领域排名第一的杂志。
引用:325.
审稿:36篇
推荐人:5个,3个非独立。
关于0454, 我看到版上有人说也被质疑过citation不到1000. 那么,我现在到底该不
该回复,还是回复后还是会悲剧。要求3月中旬交回RFE材料。 我是不是该withdraw后
重新递交,而不要浪费这个时间。如果withdraw重新递交的话需要等多长时间, 重新
递交的话直接PP的话风险大不大,会不会又遇到杀手?希望有经验的筒子能给点建议,
谢谢! | f****t 发帖数: 101 | 2 我跟你的情况类似,RFE后结果还是拒了,打算重交了。 | f****t 发帖数: 101 | 3 我考古了下,这个版至少有5人因为同样原因被0454拒了,其中多数人条件都不错。和
0214一样,即使RFE过的希望也小。 | f*********e 发帖数: 142 | | r*********0 发帖数: 1076 | | h***t 发帖数: 2540 | 6 NSC的话没绝对把握不要PP,遇到杀手概率小很多。
1000
garnered
major
【在 l********g 的大作中提到】 : 本人10月26日递交EB1A, 后过了一个月追加PP, 结果不幸遇到0454,质疑引用未过1000 : .承认了发表的文章,承认了review其他人的paper,质疑contribution。原话是:“ : upon examining your citation history,we have concluded that, while your : research demonstrates original contributions in the field, the number of : citations of your work, when compared with that of the very top scientists : in the field, whose publications(according to google scholar) have garnered : citations numbered the thousands, dose not establish contributions of major : significance in the field” : 本人情况: : 文章:21篇,一作7篇,一作有两篇IF>10,是领域排名第一的杂志。
| t*b 发帖数: 850 | 7 everyone noways is applying for EB1A. there probably will be more RFE. it is
abused. | z*****8 发帖数: 81 | | R*******d 发帖数: 13640 | 9 好好回复,过的希望挺大
1000
garnered
major
【在 l********g 的大作中提到】 : 本人10月26日递交EB1A, 后过了一个月追加PP, 结果不幸遇到0454,质疑引用未过1000 : .承认了发表的文章,承认了review其他人的paper,质疑contribution。原话是:“ : upon examining your citation history,we have concluded that, while your : research demonstrates original contributions in the field, the number of : citations of your work, when compared with that of the very top scientists : in the field, whose publications(according to google scholar) have garnered : citations numbered the thousands, dose not establish contributions of major : significance in the field” : 本人情况: : 文章:21篇,一作7篇,一作有两篇IF>10,是领域排名第一的杂志。
|
|