a*******d
发帖数: 53 | 1 Under the shadow of unshakeable partisanship, the US political machinery, in
general, could move extraordinarily slow when loaded with thorny issues.
The white house can push the congress only to a certain degree, and the
capitol hill itself is buried in a bottomless and hopeless gridlock. The
relatively fast-track minded supreme court is as so much divided, with
Justices Roberts, Scalia, Thomas and Alito reliably sitting on the right
side, and their colleagues Justices Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer |
|
g********d
发帖数: 4174 | 2 你是共和党吗？如果2000-2008 GORE是总统的话，Roberts和Alito就不会是大法官了
，现在还用担心PROP 8和DOMA案子能不能赢吗？如果McCAIN现在是总统的话，今年会
通过Hate Crimes Bills吗？废除DADT还会提到议事日程上吗？
更别忘了BUSH天天喊constitutional amemdment,如果民主党不反对的话就通过了，不是30多个州都通过了吗？你就在梦里结婚吧。 |
|
g********d
发帖数: 4174 | 3 High Court Rules for Phelps Clan
By Advocate.com Editors
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that members of the Westboro Baptist Church
, infamous for their incendiary antigay demonstrations, are protected under
the First Amendment right in protesting military funerals.
In an 8-1 ruling issued Wednesday, the court found in Snyder v. Phelps that
the church's 2006 protest of the funeral of a soldier who was killed in Iraq
did not disrupt the service, and that Westboro "addressed matters of public
i... 阅读全帖 |
|
o****g
发帖数: 657 | 4 Most of the facts here can actually be found in the archives of the Supreme
Court, and I formed my opinions after reading Jeffrey's Toobin's The NINE,
which is a nice summary about the recent history of the supreme court of the
u.s. of a.
Current sitting justices in the supreme court of United States are,
conservative judges Justices Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, Antonin Scalia,
Samuel Alito; liberal judges Justices Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia
Sotomayor, Elena Kagan; and the perpetually-kno... 阅读全帖 |
|
g********d
发帖数: 4174 | 5 Adam Winkler.Professor at UCLA School of Law
Posted: August 4, 2010 05:56 PM
How Will the Supreme Court Rule on Same-Sex Marriage?
Wednesday's landmark decision by a federal court that California's ban on
same-sex marriage violates the U.S. Constitution begins to pave the way for
an eventual Supreme Court decision on marriage equality. How will the
Supreme Court rule?
When the California case was first filed by the all-star legal team of Ted
Olson -- who argued Bush v. Gore for George W. Bush an... 阅读全帖 |
|
g********d
发帖数: 4174 | 6 【 以下文字转载自 LosAngeles 讨论区 】
发信人: Clarkwang55 (Clark), 信区: LosAngeles
标 题: 紧急动员：决战最高法院， 请投庄严一票，来捍卫你孩子公平竞争入学名校的机会
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Mar 1 01:35:03 2012, 美东)
紧急动员：决战最高法院， 请投庄严一票，来捍卫你孩子公平竞争入学名校的机会
请在以下网页签名: http://admin.80-20nj.info/cgi/80/e?l=8/11e/f&w=no
请转发！
历史性的时刻已经到来了：2/21/2012，美国最高法院决定审理用“族裔”的理由来提
高亚裔和白人高校入学门槛的做法是否违宪。您--关爱孩子未来的父母--现在就可以花
一分钟时间来帮助孩子增大孩子上他们理想大学的机会。请您立即投票赞成（FOR） 80
-20全美亚裔教育基金会的民调书，清楚明白地表明亚裔在这件案子上的立场。
资料显示，亚裔在美国要比其他族裔成绩优秀许多才能上同样的学校。要上同样的名校
，亚裔SAT要考1550分，白人1410分，而非裔只需要1100分*（英... 阅读全帖 |
|
g********d
发帖数: 4174 | 7 Legal Experts See a Close Win for Health-Reform Law
By By Dennis Thompson
HealthDay Reporter | HealthDay – 2 hrs 47 mins ago
Email
2
Print
THURSDAY, March 22 (HealthDay News) -- The U.S. Supreme Court seems likely
to uphold the sweeping health-reform legislation known as the Affordable
Care Act when it takes up the case next week, according to a small survey of
legal experts.
The experts base this prediction on a number of factors linked to the nine
justices' legal history, political considerati... 阅读全帖 |
|
g********d
发帖数: 4174 | 8 Until Tuesday, it looked like California's Proposition 8 gay marriage case
would be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. But that looks less certain now.
The narrow California-only approach adopted by the 9th Circuit means the
high court might choose to steer clear of the dispute.
If so, that would leave for another day — perhaps several years in the
future — a national ruling on same-sex marriage.
FULL COVERAGE: Prop. 8
"The opinion holds that Prop. 8 was unconstitutional only in a case where
the... 阅读全帖 |
|
g********d
发帖数: 4174 | 9 http://www.advocate.com/politics/marriage-equality/2013/03/22/s
LGBT Americans are fixated on one question surrounding the two historic gay
rights cases that will be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court next week:
Will same-sex marriage be legalized nationwide?
Though there are three basic outcomes possible that would be considered a “
win” for marriage equality, constitutional law scholar Geoffrey Stone felt
assured of this: “I think there’s zero chance of the court doing anything
harmful to th... 阅读全帖 |
|
t*******e
发帖数: 2113 | 10 他是廁所的石頭。
另外幾個保守派，不說也罷。
Roberts和Thomas稍微好點兒，
Alito也是個倨傲的家伙。 |
|
N*****e
发帖数: 1094 | 11 【 以下文字转载自 ChinaNews 讨论区 】
发信人: NewNote (新天地), 信区: ChinaNews
标 题: 民主党力阻戈萨奇任大法官 共和党胸有成竹
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Feb 2 05:38:11 2017, 美东)
美国总统川普（特朗普）周二宣布戈萨奇（中）为最高法院大法官。共和党称这正是他
们想要的，而民主党却要竭力反对。(Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
美国总统川普（特朗普）周二宣布戈萨奇（Neil Gorsuch）为最高法院大法官。共和党
称这正是他们想要的，而民主党却要竭力反对。但就目前来看，共和党对民主党的反对
表现并不慌乱，似乎对戈萨奇的确认通过很有信心。
《卫报》报导，任命戈萨奇为最高法院大法官，川普正是给了参议院共和党人长期以来
真正希望的（人选），来填补去世大法官斯卡利亚（Antonin Scalia）的空缺。但对于
民主党人来说，他们会尽一切权力所能进行阻挠。
报导称，这并不是因为戈萨奇要比入围名单上的其他人选更有问题。相反，他在很多方
面有着和斯卡利亚大法官相似的意识形态。
共和党... 阅读全帖 |
|
t**f
发帖数: 79 | 12 法官 政治属性 提名总统 提名总统的政治属性
Roberts conservative 小布什 conservative
Scalia conservative 里根 moderate
Thomas conservative 老布什 moderate
Alito conservative 小布什 conservative
Stevens liberal 福特 moderate
Souter liberal 老布什 moderate
Ginsburg liberal 克林顿 moderate
Breyer liberal 克林顿 moderate
Kennedy moderate 里根 moderate
O'Connor moderate 里根 moderate
十位最高法院大法官，共和党提名了八位，其中六名由温和派的共和党总统提名，这六
名法官两个保守，两个温和，两个liberal。极右的小 |
|
m******t
发帖数: 2416 | 13 【 以下文字转载自 America 俱乐部 】
发信人: magicfat (魔法胖子), 信区: America
标 题: Citizens United判了
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jan 21 18:13:22 2010, 美东)
结果是不出所料的，有趣的是法庭意见结构如此复杂，快赶上BBS吵架了。判决就分五
部分，然后ROBERTS和SCALIA各跟一
贴单有话要说，ALITO两贴都RE一下。THOMAS虽然RE判决但是不同意第四部分
disclosure requirement，STEVENS和其
他自由派都RE了THOMAS，却然后又写出90页的反方长贴狂拍判决其他部分。
粗粗翻了一下这个一共183页的大坑，觉得正方有个观点是相当有力，就是MCCAIN-
FEINGOLD有被滥用来禁止媒体发表倾
向性言论的危险，因为没有什么清晰的可操作的标准来区分“媒体和非媒体公司”。
STEVENS的反方砖贴里没有看到特别有说
服力的反驳。 |
|
b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | 14 主要是用Alito换了O'Connor这个温和派，才改变了court的组成。比如克林顿当年也提
名了两个大法官，但是这两个都是替换自有派的法官。所以不改变法院的组成。以前法
院有两个温和派O'Connor和肯尼迪。3个保守派，4个自由派。所以很多决定是看着两个
人的投票。这两位00年都是支持布什的。O'Connor和肯尼迪都是里根提名的。
另外有的时候总统提名的法官不一定是大家想想的。比如老布什提名的Souter。当时大
家以为他是保守派，结果他到了最高院后，直接就加入了自由派。让人大跌眼镜。当时
一个原因是Souter的判例很少，大家都不太清楚他的立场。
现在这种可能不多了，现在的提名人都有很多的判例，基本上大家都能知道他的立场了
。 |
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 15 Ann Coulter：事实上我高兴听到奥巴马说这里没人（我假设其中包括民主党）希望生
活在任何其他地方，但为什么他们总是要把美国变成西欧？
I missed the middle section of Obama's State of the Union address when I
took a break to read "War and Peace," but I gather he never got around to
what I was hoping he'd say, which is: "What was I thinking?"
The national debt is $14 trillion, the Democrats won't stop spending, and
President Nero gave us a long gaseous speech about his Stradivarius.
I feel so Southern whenever I watch a Democrat give a State of the Union
addre... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 16 Mexican Citizen Executed After Court Declines to Intervene
Texas executed a Mexican national whose prosecution violated U.S. treaty
obligations soon after the Supreme Court refused to intervene Thursday.
U.S. high court clears the way for Mexican man, convicted of rape, to be
executed in Texas. Video Courtesy of Reuters.
Humberto Leal Garcia, 38 years old, was convicted of the 1994 rape and
murder of a 16-year-old girl. He had asked the court to stay his execution
while Congress considered legis... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 17 作者:刘菲
2012-03-16 23:08:50
保证少数族裔比例的“种族平权法”在教育和企业界获得广泛采用。然而亚裔学生在高
校录取中却与白人学生一样受到“逆向歧视”之累。有人投诉此政策不公平且有悖美国
宪法精神。美国联邦最高法院2月21日表示，将重新考虑此政策。
要求学校招生、公司招聘中保证少数族裔比例的种族平权法被誉为美国上个世纪60年代
民权运动的主要成果之一，2003年最高法院曾对此做出裁决，支持公立大学在审核入学
申请时，考虑申请人族裔。然亚裔学生成绩好，在教育方面并未被当作少数族裔，种族
平权法反而徒增“逆向歧视”。目前，高校录取中的种族平权政策频受质疑，有可能被
彻底摒弃。若果如此，许多大学将不得不进行招生改革。
美国联邦最高法院2月21日表示，将重新考虑公立大学招生中的“种族平权”（
Affirmative Action）政策，即是否继续允许对少数族裔学生给予申请入学的优待。
“种族平权法”－－美国上世纪民权运动的成果
自从1978年以来，不断有人投诉大学录取中的种族平权政策不公平且有悖美国宪法精神
。反对种族平权者甚至认为新的大法官团可能彻底推翻大学录取中的这... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 18 Supreme irony? Top court poised to throw out Obamacare in echo of case Obama
made against Hillary Clinton
It is a tad unfortunate that just days after the White House embraced the
term "Obamacare" - previously regarded on the Left as a pejorative label - a
majority of the nine Supreme Court justices have given strong indications
they will rule it unconstitutional.
Even more ironic is that the justices, or five of them at least, look like
they might force President Barack Obama back to the drawin... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 19 作者:李晓宇
2012-04-16 19:13:59
奥巴马2010年3月签署的医改法案近日在美国最高法院展开激烈辩论，辩论聚焦于强制
个人购买医保条款是否违反美国宪法。法官们关注的核心是联邦政府管理个人行为的权
力界限如何界定。奥巴马随后对该案公开表态，批评最高法院缺乏约束，引来共和党议
员反击。
法官争议强制条款是否违宪
在最高法院连续三天的口头辩论中，第二天的辩论聚焦强制个人购买医疗保险的条款是
否违反宪法。奥巴马两年前就签署了这项法案，但强制个人购买保险及其他争议性条款
在2014年才会实行。
最高法院的九位法官中，有五人是偏向共和党保守派，四人是偏向民主党自由派。
支持者认为，美国需要这项强制性的规定让所有人分摊医保费用，以保证3000万无医保
人士有医疗保障；反对者则称，这项法案违反宪法，践踏个人自由。政府不该干涉民众
生活，强迫他们购买他们不愿意买的产品。
代表奥巴马政府的总检察长魏瑞利（Donald Verrilli）在法庭辩论中说，这将令数以
百万的慢性病患者－－如糖尿病和心脏病患者－－不用担心治疗的问题。
首席大法官罗伯茨（John Roberts）反驳说，奥巴... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 20 By: Patrick J. Buchanan
7/3/2012 06:57 AM
For John Roberts, it is Palm Sunday.
Out of relief and gratitude for his having saved Obamacare, he is being
compared to John Marshall and Oliver Wendell Holmes.
Liberal commentators are burbling that his act of statesmanship has shown us
the way to the sunny uplands of a new consensus.
If only Republicans will follow Roberts’ bold and brave example, and agree
to new revenues, the dark days of partisan acrimony and tea party
intransigence could be beh... 阅读全帖 |
|
Y***a
发帖数: 193 | 21 Obama赢大局已定。
明年最高法院将裁定doma.
4位民主党任命的法官会投非法，肯泥迪从来站在同志一边。
罗伯赤当年帮助过同志，alito 曾经同情过同志，只有两位是同志反对者。 |
|
m**c
发帖数: 7299 | 22 Liz Goodwin, Yahoo News October 7, 2013 5:36 AM
Just 10 years after the Supreme Court upheld the University of Michigan’s
use of race in admissions as a necessary step to foster campus diversity,
the justices are set to decide whether that state’s voters are allowed to
ban affirmative action in admissions entirely.
The case, Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, is one of
several controversial cases on the docket in the 2013-14 term, which began
Monday.
The justices are also set to... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 23 Senate Liberals Narrowly Lose Bid to Reverse SCOTUS Religious Freedom
Victory
via Breitbart Feed
Senate liberals--a mix of almost all Democrats and a few Republicans--missed
by a hair last week in a bid to overturn the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby
decision, which ruled unconstitutional the Obama administration’s heavy-
handed requirement that business owners provide abortion services for
employees, even in violation of their constitutionally protected religious
beliefs.
As reported by Politico:
... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 24 August 22, 2014 - 7:05 PM
By JOSH LEDERMAN, Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) — Seeking to quell a politically charged controversy, the
Obama administration announced new measures Friday to allow religious
nonprofits and some companies to opt out of paying for birth control for
female employees while still ensuring those employees have access to
contraception.
Even so, the accommodations may not fully satisfy religious groups who
oppose any system that makes them complicit in providing coverage t... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 25 More Obamacare Sticker Shock: HMO Rates Up 20%, EPO Up 18%, 12% Overall;
Death Spiral for Insurers?
If you did not have insurance before Obamacare, but do now, or if you are
heavily subsidized, you may consider Obamacare a blessing.
If you are not in those select groups, then you are highly likely to be
paying more for insurance now than before. And it's going to get worse. Some
plan types really take a premium hit.
Premiums Jump 12% On Average
Health Pocket reports Obamacare Insurers Propose 12... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 26 Court: Spouse can't protest husband's visa denial
By the Associated Press | June 15, 2015 | 2:25 PM EDT
WASHINGTON (AP) — A California woman can't challenge the government's
decision to deny a visa to her spouse from Afghanistan, the Supreme Court
ruled Monday.
Split along ideological lines, the justices ruled 5-4 that Fauzia Din, a
naturalized U.S. citizen, had no basis to protest after the visa petition
she filed for her husband was rejected in 2009 due to concerns about
terrorism.
Din's husba... 阅读全帖 |
|
S**C
发帖数: 2964 | 27 I expect this one will be 5-3, Kennedy will write the plurality opinion,
joined by Roberts, Alito, Scalia and Thomas.
Sotomayor will write dissenting opinion, joined by Ginsburg and Breyer.
Kagan will recuse herself.
The chance is about 60-40, again, all eyes on Kennedy. |
|
b*x
发帖数: 5456 | 28 WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court said Monday it would again consider
affirmative action at public universities, the third time since 2003 the
issue of race-based admissions has come before the justices.
The court said it would examine admissions practices at the University of
Texas at Austin, which has been at the epicenter of the affirmative action
debate since the 1990s, when a federal appeals court blocked the flagship
campus from considering race until a 2003 Supreme Court decision reinstated
th... 阅读全帖 |
|
x****k
发帖数: 2932 | 29 谢谢，刚做了下功课
Roberts, Scalia and Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. all criticized UT's plan.
Justice Clarence Thomas, the court's only African American, asked no
questions, but he has made it clear in the past that he opposes affirmative
action.
The liberal justices - Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor, the
court's only Hispanic - were supportive of the university's program,
agreeing that it was a minimal use of race in support of creating a diverse
student body that provides a richer learni... 阅读全帖 |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 30 今日Montgomery v. Louisiana判决宣布，结果很简单，未满18岁的重罪犯不得判死刑
，除非这个少年犯肯定会犯一辈子罪。
判决票数6：3，反对的三票是Alito, Scalia和Thomas，刚好就是三个坚定反对AA的保
守派大法官。 |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 31 高院很多案子和左右一点关系都没有，或者说，左右两派对很多高院案子都不关心。
说哪个大法官是左是右大家分歧很少，但是说哪个大法官左右的程度真的就是非常主观
了。 |
|
S**C
发帖数: 2964 | 32 Roberts and Alito are nominated by Bush 43.
对比Obama提名的Sotomayor和Roberts。Sotomayor最坚定的AA支持者。Roberts尽管被
to stop |
|
|
t*******h
发帖数: 2744 | 34 不可能的事
Time taken from nomination by president to confirmation by senate:
Kagan: 3 months
Sotomayor: 2 months
Alito: 2 months
Meirs: withdrawn same month
Roberts: 2 months (well, two attempts at one month each)
Breyer: 2 months
Ginsburg: 2 months
Thomas: 3 months
Souter: 3 months
Kennedy: 3 months
Bork: 3 months (rejected 1987)
Scalia: 3 months
Rehnquist: 3 months
...
Iredel: 2 days (1790)
So, modern times are all around 2-3 months. |
|
|
c*******o
发帖数: 8869 | 36 很有料的干货。
按照alito的观点,用social economic status 取代ratio quota会不会成为左右共识？
20 |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 37 我俩公认Cruz人品不好，做朋友我是绝对不会选他。但我也理解他，律师出身，都这德
性。
John Roberts不如alito，scalia，Thomas他们那样保守，但是在很多问题上还是很保
守的，譬如AA。当初提名的时候在，Cruz也就是以参议员身份表示支持而已。床铺就不
同了，他没有从政过，没有历史包袱。
你的第二点我没看明白，你如果是指要抵抗Obama提名大法官的话，那只有尽可能地挡
住才是保守派本色。否则不得了了，AA就全合法了。
把PP搞掉，才是极端保守派的做法啊。
我支持Cruz的可以作为保守派的几点是
1，税法简单，废除税务局
2，还土地于州政府，中央小型化
3，common core废除，也是小中央政府
好像还有其他几点，就不去查了，我反正初选选Cruz，大选选共和党。酱紫。 |
|
|
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 40 昨天颁布的Luis v. United States就是讲这个的。判决结果5：3，大法官们认为嫌疑
犯可以用合法收入來请律师。
这个案子是个和左右思想无关的小案子。两派大法官交错投票。3票反对的是保守派的
Kennedy, Alito,和自由派的Kagan.值得一提的是，托马斯，多次引用Scalia的观点。
Justice Thomas cited a dissent from Justice Antonin Scalia, who died last
month, for that second point. He also cited Justice Scalia’s writings four
more times.
然后，托马斯的保守派观点，依旧风采照人。
“The right to keep and bear arms, for example, ‘implies a corresponding
right to obtain the bullets necessary to use them,’ ” he wrote, quoting an
appeals court de... 阅读全帖 |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 41 这个案子的焦点就是，划分选区，应该基于所有人口，还是应该基于投票人口。
八名法官都同意选区划分可以基于总人口，但两大保守派alito和托马斯，不同意其他
法官的理由。 |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 42 mike lee他朋友，很大可能。做过现任保守派大法官alito 的下属。 |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 43 今天又眼巴巴地等我邻居案的判决，照样没出来。题目里的这个案子倒是判决出来了。
这个案子的情节是这样，某警察在下班期间在草坪上举着一个和现任市长竞选的人的牌
子，被人看见，第二天就被贬了。实际上呢，这个警察只是在帮他卧病在床的妈妈收牌
子而已，他也不在那个选区。
告到最高法院，六名大法官认为这警察的第一修正案权利被侵犯。虽然这名警察在举牌
子的时候根本不是在实践他的第一修正案权利，但是他老板要贬他的动机就是要侵犯他
的这个权利，警察老板坏了坏了的。
但是俺的俩偶像，托马斯和alito却不同意这个看法，俺一开始很诧异，仔细研究了一
下，明白了。他俩的理由是，连这个警察自己也不认为他是在实践第一修正案权利，那
么别人就无从侵犯他的这个权利。警察老板有这个想法，那不算。就像，我已经在脑子
里强奸过无数美女，但你依然不能判我强奸罪。
托马斯举一个例子来说明，假设某城市的本地法律是警察可以随意拦车，这个就侵犯了
被拦捡的司机的宪法权利，然而，那些没被拦捡的司机的权利就没有被侵犯。
俺嚼着，都他奶奶地很有道理。
http://www.scotusblog.com/2016/04/opinion-an... 阅读全帖 |
|
c*******o
发帖数: 8869 | 44 "撰擬最高法院裁決的首席大法官羅伯茲寫道，檢方便條證明該案陪審員的挑選，明顯
不符該州聲稱挑選陪審員不論膚色的原則。檢方便條顯示，檢察官在非裔待選陪審員的
名字旁附註「B」字母，並以綠筆凸顯，同時在問卷中圈出詢問族裔問題的答案「black
」一字。"
this is so egregious. No wonder even Alito sided with liberal justices. |
|
c*******o
发帖数: 8869 | 45 if you are even questioning Justice Samuel Alito's conservative credential,
I have nothing more to say... |
|
T*********I
发帖数: 10729 | 46 Justice ALITO是保守我没问题。
但是这个案例里，高院整体对一个检察官的内心深处的推断过于武断，过于想当然。完
全没有公正好言。体现不出高院应有的思想水平。
美国支柱完了。我们警醒一些。自求多福。
, |
|
t******y
发帖数: 145 | 47 2016年6月23日，這一天對所有的亞裔，尤其是華人來說，是令人遺憾的一天。當天上
午，聯邦最高法院以四比三做出裁決，認為德州大學（Fisher vs. Univ. of Texas）
在招生中將學生族裔作為錄取條件之一合法，並不違反憲法（lawful under the Equal
Protection Clause），這是聯邦最高法庭第二次就大學招生考慮族裔而做出判決。此
判決將為很多大學搞族裔配額提供法律支持，而華人控告哈佛等名校招生歧視訴訟將陷
入困境。
在2016年的今天，大學還可以根據族裔和膚色來決定是否錄取，這是有關美國族裔平等
最大的笑話，也是對亞裔最大的羞辱。喬治奧威爾的政治諷刺寓言「動物莊園」，動物
領導說，「all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others
.（所有動物一律平等，不過有一些動物就是比其他動物更平等）」，這句話在美國演
出了現實版。
在大學錄取考慮種族的政策下，亞裔的孩子必須要比其他族裔SAT成績多考150分才有機
會和他們坐在同一間大學教室裏，這是活生生血淋淋的不公... 阅读全帖 |
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 48 属实，楼上两位都是内行。
基于种族的特殊政策。一定要通过最高的严格检视标准。这是由高院判例决定了的。
基于性别的，检视标准没有那么高。
当然，在执法玩法的左派大法官和冒牌保守派大法官面前，严格检视就是一张卫生纸。
参见alito在Fisher一案的反对观点的第一句“真是奇了怪了...” |
|
|
f**********n
发帖数: 29853 | 50 你的两篇文章写得很好。
alito的51页观点我还在消化中。 |
|
