c***t
发帖数: 383 | 1 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Charityfraud (Watchdog) 于 (Thu Apr 4 11:07:42 2013, 美东) 提到:
在美国即使一个人不理道德上的约束，凡事还是有法律约束的。 虽然我不是
charitable solicitations法律的专家， 但初读加州charitable solicitations法律
条款， 我相信康妈此次向公众大规模公募(solicitation for charitable purpose)可
能已经初犯了加州法律和其他类似联邦慈善法(because her solicitation was via
the Internet, which crossed the state line)。以下引用加州charitable
solicitations Code Sections 17510。这应该govern次类公众募捐的法律。请注意这
些条款也适用于solicitation for charitable purpose by individuals不仅仅是by
a... 阅读全帖 |
|
C**********d
发帖数: 4 | 2 在美国即使一个人不理道德上的约束，凡事还是有法律约束的。 虽然我不是
charitable solicitations法律的专家， 但初读加州charitable solicitations法律
条款， 我相信康妈此次向公众大规模公募(solicitation for charitable purpose)可
能已经初犯了加州法律和其他类似联邦慈善法(because her solicitation was via
the Internet, which crossed the state line)。以下引用加州charitable
solicitations Code Sections 17510。这应该govern次类公众募捐的法律。请注意这
些条款也适用于solicitation for charitable purpose by individuals不仅仅是by
an organization。
网上公众舆论一直要求信息透明，要求康妈公开她受到款项的用途走向等等，这个要求
被某些人批成没事找事，康妈没这个义务。实际上她不仅有这个义务，而且法律要求她
必须这么做- Knowi... 阅读全帖 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 3 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: mitor (mitor), 信区: Military
标 题: Donald Trump used $20K worth of charitable donations to buy (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Sep 12 23:53:04 2016, 美东)
发信人: mitor (mitor), 信区: USANews
标 题: Donald Trump used $20K worth of charitable donations to buy a 6' tall painting of Donald Trump
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Sep 12 23:52:29 2016, 美东)
The Donald J Trump Foundation raised a lot of other peoples' money and spent
it on things that benefited Trump, while allowing the Republican
pres... 阅读全帖 |
|
m***r
发帖数: 798 | 4 【 以下文字转载自 USANews 讨论区 】
发信人: mitor (mitor), 信区: USANews
标 题: Donald Trump used $20K worth of charitable donations to buy a 6' tall painting of Donald Trump
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Sep 12 23:52:29 2016, 美东)
The Donald J Trump Foundation raised a lot of other peoples' money and spent
it on things that benefited Trump, while allowing the Republican
presidential candidate to falsely claim to have made enormous, public
spirited donations.
For example, in 2009/10, the Evans Foundation gave the Trump Foun... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
z*****y
发帖数: 554 | 6 巴菲特基本就靠charitable来实现低税率，还天天叫嚣税交少了，为什么不让他求仁得
仁？有仁慈之心的人用自己税后的钱施舍有什么不可以呢？charitable loophole是左
臂伪君子们的命门，这都给他们留着？
state/local/property tax都是税，交了local的税在联邦taxable就是典型的双重或多
重征税。
哥对税改在这两点的翻转上可以说是相当失望！ |
|
z*****y
发帖数: 554 | 7 charitable的方法很多，比如往下调整deduct上界等.
不动charitable就等着巴菲特和左臂伪君子继续嚣张吧！到时候巴菲特再拿出张2017的
稅表继续羞辱trump |
|
h**o
发帖数: 1879 | 8 我给你们来点专业的吧，如果是一个慈善机构来做募捐，在哪个州活动，就需要在哪个
州注册一下（不一定是注册 business），符合一定的条件，比如说捐款额比较小，可
以豁免，不需要注册。各州豁免的条件都不一样。注册了，就比较容易监管。如果做募
捐，但不符合豁免注册的条件而又没注册的话，就违反了当地的法律。对于网上的募捐
，很多州的法规是没跟上的，所以相对是灰色地带。
如果不是慈善机构来做募捐，而是为了某个个人来做，各州管 charity 的那些法律不
适用，因为不是 charitable fundraising。下面这个和楼主给的加州的规定，都是适
用于 charitable soliciting，适用 Q 的员工通过 ACCEF 捐款，不适用网友直接给尹
/康家捐款。
http://www.mass.gov/ago/doing-business-in-massachusetts/public- |
|
m***r
发帖数: 798 | 9 The Donald J Trump Foundation raised a lot of other peoples' money and spent
it on things that benefited Trump, while allowing the Republican
presidential candidate to falsely claim to have made enormous, public
spirited donations.
For example, in 2009/10, the Evans Foundation gave the Trump Foundation $150
,000. In the same years, the Trump Foundation's total disbursements were $
150,000. Trump took 150K from Evans, gave it away, and claimed that he had
been a generous giver -- he even won an a... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
f******d
发帖数: 2394 | 11 "巴菲特基本就靠charitable来实现低税率",joke of the day. |
|
h****n
发帖数: 3447 | 12 这个取消了，那么多Charitable组织不就和要饭的一个效果了。
有多少人愿意给你钱，然后再帮你把这笔钱的税交给政府呢？ |
|
s******g
发帖数: 654 | 13 You are in a poor community. Some of my friends donate to our church more
than $4,000/person a year. For a rich guy, his charitable contribution is
more than $100,000 every year. |
|
o***h
发帖数: 7 | 14 对除Property Tax外没有大的Itemized deductions的家庭来说，通过年初年末交
Property Tax可以使两年的地税集中在一年而用Itemized deductions报税，而另外每
隔一年用Standard Deduction报税。这个trick不少人都知道。另外可不可以把
Standard Deduction报税年份的Charitable donations用carryover的方式加到下一年
的Itemized deductions里从而抵更多的税？ |
|
h**o
发帖数: 1879 | 15 就是个例子，讲这个 charitable purpose 是怎么理解的。个人对个人，不归这些管理
charity 的部门管。 |
|
g********1
发帖数: 178 | 16 帮我找几篇文章呗？关键词是：social environment，individual charitable
bahaviour 主要就是个人捐赠行为的主要影响因素，尤其注重于社会环境或社会关系
对于个人捐赠行为的影响 |
|
w*******y
发帖数: 60932 | 17 Feeling grateful for all the gifts you got today? Give back efficiently and
maximize your contribution:
$15 gets you a $30 Charitable Donation to Save the Children
Link:
http://www.groupon.com/deals/save-the-children-1
Don't forget to get Cashback!
|
|
c***t
发帖数: 383 | 18 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
whatifbar ( 浮生哪得长无事，愿读人间未读书。) 于 (Fri Apr 12 14:31:11 2013, 美东) 提到:
update 首先感谢你们科普ocef. 至少我觉得找回了一些郭美美之后对华人慈善组织的
信任。
其次我想请教在plead的大作 http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t1/WaterWorld/1871087_0_1.html 中提到：
“3，OCEF从未以组织名义发起为某一特定家庭/个人的募捐。美国法律501(3)(C)亦禁止
OCEF接受特殊捐款用于某人/组织特定/指定的某个受益人，以确保筹款不会用于违背其
创立宗旨的灰色地带。因为有此类约束，大家不必担心因为义工们各自不同的立场而影
响OCEF对善款的管理和运用。”
请问这个具体的法律条文是什么？
我还有几个问题：
在美国
公开募捐的机构和个人有什么权力与义务
募捐和没有募捐的人在有没有权力监督， 募捐和没有募捐的人在监督的权力上有什么
不同。监督的方式有哪些。
这些问题不仅仅是针对康妈... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
N*********6
发帖数: 2302 | 20 Fundraising for an Individual
This advisory summarizes the major issues involved with fundraising for an
individual. It is not meant to be a substitute for legal counsel but, rather
, an introduction to the issues you will need to think about. The Attorney
General's Office (AGO) is not authorized to provide legal representation to
individuals: you should consider consulting a private attorney regarding
fundraising for an individual.
A "donor" is someone who donates or gives money or property to ... 阅读全帖 |
|
t******n
发帖数: 2939 | 21 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
easttowest (jx) 于 (Wed Apr 3 16:19:05 2013, 美东) 提到:
怎么说也没用的，她老公工资又不高，一个人在加州养五口人，还有个孩子生病的，需
要相当节俭。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
PatekPhilip (酷猪) 于 (Wed Apr 3 16:21:15 2013, 美东) 提到:
尼玛有个HOUSE住就知足吧。。。多少人住APARTMENT呢。多少锁男租人家的客厅助，周
围就用纸盒子围起来。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
maolilan (毛利兰) 于 (Wed Apr 3 16:23:51 2013, 美东) 提到:
我支持你这个观点，但是估计难以实现。
�
�
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
easttowest (jx) 于 (We... 阅读全帖 |
|
p***d
发帖数: 1595 | 22 我看了，HGUO不但回复了，还写信去加州政府查询。这个态度强过只质疑不求证的人太
多。
发信人: hguo (Who+am+I?), 信区: WaterWorld
标 题: Re: Seriously, 有没有懂法律的同学研究一下
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jan 16 17:49:47 2014, 美东)
不过，要注意有一条，是没有注册不可以在加州做 charitable purpose 的
fundraising。什么意思呢？就是 fundraising 有好多种，象学校小孩做个什么活动，
搞个 fundraising，那个不算 charitable purpose。Disaster relief 专门针对某个
人某一家的，在 community 做点 fundraising，也不算 charitable purpose。
ACCEF 给康的小孩设立专门的教育基金，这个算不算 charitable purpose，我不清楚
。如果算的话，没有注册就是有问题的。如果不算的话，没有注册虽然没问题，但说 Q
那边可以 match，可能是有问题的。因为一般公司的 match... 阅读全帖 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 23 不确定 Fact Check 说法的正确性，不评论只转贴，大家自己判断。底下简单摘要：
共和党总统候选人 Fiorina 曾经指控：克林顿基金会只有 6% 的钱是用在慈善事业上
。Fact Check 说这误会是因为他只计算了克林顿基金会拨款给其他慈善机构的金额。
但是柯林顿基金会与其他基金会不同，他们不是个专门发钱的过路财神，而是自己直接
做了很多慈善事业。所以发出去的钱并不多，而自己用掉的才是大宗。所以 6% 的指控
是个误会。
Fact Check 引用了另外一个监督组织 Charity Watch 的审核，该审核认定他们 89%
的钱是用在慈善事业上。
同时 Fact Check 也反驳了福斯新闻主播 Gerri Willis 的指控。Willis 说 Charity
Navigator 停止了对克林顿基金会的评分，而把他们放在观察名单上，是因为觉得他们
有问题。但 Charity Navigator 否认这种说法，说不是因为有问题，只是因为克林顿
基金会运作方式与其他基金会不同，他们的模型不适用。
底下是原文，连接都在，大家自己判断。
https://www.factchec... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*******l
发帖数: 8210 | 24 好吧，既然你说到法律，那就把你所基于法律贴出来，让大家伙看看了。 加州政府给
你的信，写得明明白白，
The Registry of Charitable Trusts public website
has the correct status for American Chinese Culture
and Education Foundation, as Not Registered.
Public Benefit organizations are required by
California law to register within 30 days of
first receiving assets (i.e. donations) in order
to conduct fundraising to be used for charitable
purposes.
看明白了？ 你本身公开捐款就是 Charitable Purpose, for fundraising with
public donation... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****z
发帖数: 29846 | 25 Liberals never tire of discussing their own generosity, particularly when
demanding that the government take your money by force to fund shiftless
government employees overseeing counterproductive government programs.
They seem to have replaced "God" with "Government" in scriptural phrases
such as "love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul,
and with all your mind." (Matthew 22:37)
This week, we'll take a peek at the charitable giving of these champions of
the poor.
In 20... 阅读全帖 |
|
w****h
发帖数: 1344 | 26 大姐啊，俺们中产就不要为巨富操心怎么省税了。你Google一段英文就表示你了解巨富
必须得交税了，没有Loophole了？ 你要说明啥啊？ 俺不是给巨富做税的律师，俺也不
比你懂多少，但你这段东拼西凑的话前后都根本不搭嘎。
简单地说： charitable remainder trust 不交 capital gain tax. 卖房子也好股票
也好。 而且巨富在“捐献“的时候这个房子股票还是Deduction。CRT可以用来政治捐
款，他她们养的政客肯定会给主子把包养的钱十倍百倍挣回来。
下面说遗产税，这个不需要CRT，比如我有一千万，trust 每年俺Tax Bracket给儿女x
万就行了。这只是最简单上中产的理解。实际上就像俺说的，俺们中产就别为巨富操心
了。从巨富手里收不到一分钱的遗产税。遗产税这个话题根本是转移视线用的。估计你
我都谈不上遗产税。
勤勤恳恳挣钱的高级打工仔的钱我也不眼红。那是别人口袋里的钱，自己挣的钱花的才
心安。俺也没挣到39%。但我也不眼红39%降到35%，哈哈哈哈。
: A charitable trust described in Inte... 阅读全帖 |
|
p****n
发帖数: 2247 | 27 帮你一起转一贴：
发信人: hguo (Who+am+I?), 信区: WaterWorld
标 题: Re: Seriously, 有没有懂法律的同学研究一下
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jan 16 17:49:47 2014, 美东)
不过，要注意有一条，是没有注册不可以在加州做 charitable purpose 的
fundraising。什么意思呢？就是 fundraising 有好多种，象学校小孩做个什么活动，
搞个 fundraising，那个不算 charitable purpose。Disaster relief 专门针对某个
人某一家的，在 community 做点 fundraising，也不算 charitable purpose。
ACCEF 给康的小孩设立专门的教育基金，这个算不算 charitable purpose，我不清楚
。如果算的话，没有注册就是有问题的。如果不算的话，没有注册虽然没问题，但说 Q
那边可以 match，可能是有问题的。因为一般公司的 match 都是 charitable
purpose 的捐款才行。除非 Q 当... 阅读全帖 |
|
l****f
发帖数: 332 | 28 http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/24/inside-the-romney
January 24, 2012, 8:42 am
Inside the Romney Tax Returns
By FLOYD NORRIS, NICHOLAS CONFESSORE and STEPHANIE STROM
Mitt Romney’s campaign released details of his federal tax returns on
Tuesday morning, providing the most detailed view yet of his wealthy family
’s finances.
Times reporters are looking into the specifics of the returns. Follow along
for analysis, and view the individual returns.
# Mitt and Ann Romney’s tax returns: 2010... 阅读全帖 |
|
h**o
发帖数: 1879 | 29 不过，要注意有一条，是没有注册不可以在加州做 charitable purpose 的
fundraising。什么意思呢？就是 fundraising 有好多种，象学校小孩做个什么活动，
搞个 fundraising，那个不算 charitable purpose。Disaster relief 专门针对某个
人某一家的，在 community 做点 fundraising，也不算 charitable purpose。
ACCEF 给康的小孩设立专门的教育基金，这个算不算 charitable purpose，我不清楚
。如果算的话，没有注册就是有问题的。如果不算的话，没有注册虽然没问题，但说 Q
那边可以 match，可能是有问题的。因为一般公司的 match 都是 charitable
purpose 的捐款才行。除非 Q 当时有特别的条款，说这个针对个人的可以。
for
The |
|
o****y
发帖数: 26355 | 30 我GOOGLE了IRS网站，
你自己慢慢读吧。
Guidelines for Monetary Donations
To deduct any charitable donation of money, a taxpayer must have a bank
record or a written communication from the charity showing the name of the
charity and the date and amount of the contribution. A bank record includes
canceled checks, bank or credit union statements and credit card statements.
Bank or credit union statements should show the name of the charity and the
date and amount paid. Credit card statements should show the name ... 阅读全帖 |
|
G**Y
发帖数: 33224 | 31 My 2015 return shows adjusted gross income of $11,563,931. M deductions
totaled $5,477,694, of which allowable charitable contributions were $3,469,
179. All but $36,037 of the remainder was for state income taxes.
The total charitable contributions I made during the year were $2,858,057,
970, of which more than $2.85 billion were not taken as deductions and never
will be. Tax law properly limits charitable deductions.
收入只有11M，charitable contribution 2.86B。
求大牛解释。 |
|
s*******u
发帖数: 692 | 32 A charitable trust described in Internal Revenue Code section 4947(a)(1) is
a trust that is not tax exempt, all of the unexpired interests of which are
devoted to one or more charitable purposes, and for which a charitable
contribution deduction was allowed under a specific section of the Internal
Revenue Code.Aug 12, 2017
charitable trust 也只是改变了交税的时间， 遗产税和赠与税 共享了五百多万的免
税额， 你生前放进了trust, 一样得交赠与税。
其实大部分人是不用交遗产税的， 夫妻双方的免税额就有一千多万， 所以收起来其
实不麻烦， 只有一小部分人需要盯着， 比如总统这样的。 |
|
a*********a
发帖数: 3656 | 33 it is not rare for charitable foundations to give out 7 figure salaries to
its directors. it is also not rare for the donor's siblings to sit on the
board of the charitable.
it must also be noted, charitable foundations do not even pay sales taxes in
at least some states, even if they were buying mansions, yachts, private
planes ...
if the donor of the charitable has access to good investment vehicles, the
foundation could actually make more money each year than having to spend on
its cause. thu... 阅读全帖 |
|
r****a
发帖数: 3249 | 34 发信人: hguo (Who+am+I?), 信区: WaterWorld
标 题: Re: Seriously, 有没有懂法律的同学研究一下
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jan 16 17:24:18 2014, 美东)
HGuo,
The Registry of Charitable Trusts public website has the correct status for
American Chinese Culture and Education Foundation, as Not Registered.
Public Benefit organizations are required by California law to register
within 30 days of first receiving assets (i.e. donations) in order to
conduct fundraising to be used for charitable purposes. This entity was
incorporated ... 阅读全帖 |
|
r****a
发帖数: 3249 | 35 发信人: hguo (Who+am+I?), 信区: WaterWorld
标 题: Re: Seriously, 有没有懂法律的同学研究一下
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jan 16 17:24:18 2014, 美东)
HGuo,
The Registry of Charitable Trusts public website has the correct status for
American Chinese Culture and Education Foundation, as Not Registered.
Public Benefit organizations are required by California law to register
within 30 days of first receiving assets (i.e. donations) in order to
conduct fundraising to be used for charitable purposes. This entity was
incorporated ... 阅读全帖 |
|
e*********u
发帖数: 3591 | 36 【 以下文字转载自 WaterWorld 讨论区 】
发信人: CleverBeaver (我不是Otter), 信区: WaterWorld
标 题: ABCDEF经加州政府核实确实是无证经营
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jan 16 17:42:36 2014, 美东)
发信人: hguo (Who+am+I?), 信区: WaterWorld
标 题: Re: Seriously, 有没有懂法律的同学研究一下
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jan 16 17:24:18 2014, 美东)
查证好了，那谁说要去找 Q 的？快去吧
========================
HGuo,
The Registry of Charitable Trusts public website has the correct status for
American Chinese Culture and Education Foundation, as Not Registered.
Public Benefit organizations are requi... 阅读全帖 |
|
g********0
发帖数: 15010 | 37 官方的数据：
2012 Mileage Reimbursement Rates
On December 9, 2011, the IRS announced the 2012 mileage reimbursement rates.
Starting on January 1, 2012, the following rates apply to personal cars,
minivans, trucks, SUVs, and panel trucks:
14.0 cents per mile driven in service of charitable organizations
23.0 cents per mile driven for medical or moving purposes
55.5 cents per mile for business miles driven
2011 Mileage Reimbursement Rates
On December 3, 2010, the IRS announced the 2011 mil... 阅读全帖 |
|
h**o
发帖数: 1879 | 38 查证好了，那谁说要去找 Q 的？快去吧
========================
HGuo,
The Registry of Charitable Trusts public website has the correct status for
American Chinese Culture and Education Foundation, as Not Registered.
Public Benefit organizations are required by California law to register
within 30 days of first receiving assets (i.e. donations) in order to
conduct fundraising to be used for charitable purposes. This entity was
incorporated on 6/30/04.
It appears that the status is tax-exempt with the Franchise Ta... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*******l
发帖数: 8210 | 39 you should read it again. as a charitable education/culture/finance org, u
should understand which category is right for u.
WHO MUST FILE A FORM RRF-1?
Every charitable nonprofit corporation, unincorporated
association or trustee holding assets for charitable
purposes that is required to register with the Attorney
General’s Office is also required to annually file Form
RRF-1 regardless of whether the corporation files Form
990s annually or is on extended reporting. Nonprofit
corporations and or... 阅读全帖 |
|
C**********r
发帖数: 8189 | 40 发信人: hguo (Who+am+I?), 信区: WaterWorld
标 题: Re: Seriously, 有没有懂法律的同学研究一下
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jan 16 17:24:18 2014, 美东)
查证好了，那谁说要去找 Q 的？快去吧
========================
HGuo,
The Registry of Charitable Trusts public website has the correct status for
American Chinese Culture and Education Foundation, as Not Registered.
Public Benefit organizations are required by California law to register
within 30 days of first receiving assets (i.e. donations) in order to
conduct fundraising to be used for charit... 阅读全帖 |
|
G***W
发帖数: 1967 | 41 【 以下文字转载自 Family 讨论区 】
发信人: GSJTW (gsw), 信区: Family
标 题: Re: 请不要放弃，我的朋友！
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Dec 14 21:50:48 2015, 美东)
Top 5 Fundraising Legal Tips
Do fundraising professionals have to think about legal compliance and risk
management? Absolutely.
Do they spend an appropriate amount of organizational resources in these
areas? Probably not.
Law-related programs at fundraising conferences tend to be some of the least
popular. What accounts for this? I'm guessing that the general lack of
popu... 阅读全帖 |
|
m********y
发帖数: 21909 | 42 【 以下文字转载自 WaterWorld 讨论区 】
发信人: kindlefire (kindle fire), 信区: WaterWorld
标 题: [合集] ｌｉｌｙｋａｎｇ事件亲历者所见到的事实和一些看法 (
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jan 7 22:39:01 2014, 美东)
发信人: thirdman (三蛮子), 信区: WaterWorld
标 题: [合集] ｌｉｌｙｋａｎｇ事件亲历者所见到的事实和一些看法
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Apr 3 02:12:55 2013, 美东)
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Visitation (地沟油一喝，好事自然来) 于 (Sun Mar 17 02:06:26 2013, 美东) 提到:
有好多人说ｌｉｌｙｋａｎｇ在网上直播了丈夫的死亡，然后通过呼吁大家捐钱敛财什
么的。在这里我说说我所看到的事实和我的看法，免得不负责任的流言和猜测满天飞：
1)lilykang并没有直播丈夫的死亡。ｌｉｌｙｋａｎｇ一开始在“我爱宝宝”版... 阅读全帖 |
|
m********y
发帖数: 21909 | 43 【 以下文字转载自 SanDiego 讨论区 】
发信人: rowena (最忆是江南), 信区: SanDiego
标 题: Re: 咱不吵，咱只认事实： 《上海市募捐条例》节选 (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Jan 26 16:19:56 2014, 美东)
这里是加州的募捐条例。
http://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/charities/publicat
P15.
The law requires a commercial fundraiser for
charitable purposes to disclose, prior to oral solicitation or
sales solicitation, that the solicitation is in fact being
conducted by a commercial fundraiser. The law also requires
disclosure of the name of the fundraiser as it is... 阅读全帖 |
|
f*r
发帖数: 408 | 44 【 以下文字转载自 Stock 讨论区 】
发信人: flr (我是牛人), 信区: Stock
标 题: Madoff 案里另一个被自杀的浮出水面，老婆还钱了
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Dec 17 21:49:22 2010, 美东)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/17/AR2010121705773.html
Widow of longtime Madoff investor to return money
By Zachary A. Goldfarb
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, December 17, 2010; 7:01 PM
Before his death, Jeffrey M. Picower had benefited more than anyone from
Bernard Madoff's fraud. A longtime investor with the disgraced financier, he
... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*********2
发帖数: 48111 | 45 btw, trust fund还是要以慈善最为名义上的目的和资金消费口， 你自己看一下trust
vs. foundation的区别。 所以一般说信托的时候， 它都有相关联的慈善机构作为销账
的工具。
The difference between a Trust and a Foundation is that a Trust is a
specific legal entity whereas a Foundation can be a Trust, a Company
limited by guarantee etc.
A Trust is an arrangement whereby two or more individuals (or a trust
corporation) declare in a deed that they hold certain cash, land or other
assets upon trust for charitable purposes. The purposes of the organisation
must be exclusi... 阅读全帖 |
|
k********e
发帖数: 1416 | 46 【 以下文字转载自 WaterWorld 讨论区 】
发信人: thirdman (三蛮子), 信区: WaterWorld
标 题: [合集] ｌｉｌｙｋａｎｇ事件亲历者所见到的事实和一些看法
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Apr 3 02:12:55 2013, 美东)
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Visitation (地沟油一喝，好事自然来) 于 (Sun Mar 17 02:06:26 2013, 美东) 提到:
有好多人说ｌｉｌｙｋａｎｇ在网上直播了丈夫的死亡，然后通过呼吁大家捐钱敛财什
么的。在这里我说说我所看到的事实和我的看法，免得不负责任的流言和猜测满天飞：
1)lilykang并没有直播丈夫的死亡。ｌｉｌｙｋａｎｇ一开始在“我爱宝宝”版发帖求
ｂｌｅｓｓ（宝宝版有这个风气，老公面试啦，小孩子病了，都来求ｂｌｅｓｓ）。她
说她丈夫得胃癌住院，现在昏迷不醒，希望大家给予祝福。我因为刚刚当了奶爸，也经
常去我爱宝宝版逛，当时看到了这个帖子，非常感概。那时很多ｉｄ（大部分是妈妈）
给了ｂｌｅｓｓ。几... 阅读全帖 |
|
a*********a
发帖数: 3656 | 47 All lefties grand ideas share one common trait, they all have "unintended"
consequences that come back to bite lefties right in their asses. O8care
being
the latest example. Wealth tax being a long tradition by now.
1. wealth tax needs an amendment to the constitution. Good luck with that.
2. wealth is extremely hard to measure, much harder to measure than income,
particularly the wealth of the wealthy. As a result, the poor and middle
class would be hammered by a wealth tax if there was such a ... 阅读全帖 |
|
m*******p
发帖数: 1978 | 48 巴菲特回应全文。床粉不羞耻吗？找块豆腐一头碰死算了。
Answering a question last night about his $916 million income tax loss
carryforward in 1995, Donald Trump stated that ‘Warren Buffett took a
massive deduction.’ Mr. Trump says he knows more about taxes than any other
human. He has not seen my income tax returns. But I am happy to give him
the facts.
My 2015 return shows adjusted gross income of $11,563,931. M deductions
totaled $5,477,694, of which allowable charitable contributions were $3,469,
179. All but $36,037 of... 阅读全帖 |
|
G**Y
发帖数: 33224 | 49 My 2015 return shows adjusted gross income of $11,563,931. M deductions
totaled $5,477,694, of which allowable charitable contributions were $3,469,
179. All but $36,037 of the remainder was for state income taxes.
The total charitable contributions I made during the year were $2,858,057,
970, of which more than $2.85 billion were not taken as deductions and never
will be. Tax law properly limits charitable deductions. |
|
