r******e
发帖数: 289 | 1 The Dow has risen for six days straight, its longest streak of gains since
November.It adds a lot of pressure on the bond market which drives up the
mortgage interest rate.
Conforming Loan (<=417k)
Purpose of Loan 30 YR 15 YR 5/1
Purchase Loan 4.875 4.250 3.375
Refinance Loan 5.000 4.375 4.000
The rates are based on criterion below and good for the time when they are
quoted:
Loan $ >=400K, FICO>=740, LTV<=80%( SFH) or 75%( Condo), primary residence.
There is no point... 阅读全帖 |
|
r******e
发帖数: 289 | 2 Conforming Loan (<=417k)
Purpose of Loan 30 YR 15 YR 5/1
Purchase Loan 4.875 4.250 3.375
Refinance Loan 5.000 4.375 4.000
The rates are based on criterion below and good for the time when they are
quoted:
Loan $ >=400K, FICO>=740, LTV<=80%( SFH) or 75%( Condo), primary residence.
There is no point, no fee for refinance but there is fee for purchase loan.
Rate change is subject to loan amount, impound and other conditions.
High Balance Loan (<=729k)
Purpose of Loan ... 阅读全帖 |
|
r******e
发帖数: 289 | 3 Mortgage rates stop blooding, but no recovery sign is looming at this time.
Conforming Loan (<=417k)
Purpose of Loan 30 YR 15 YR 5/1
Purchase Loan 4.875 4.250 3.375
Refinance Loan 5.000 4.375 4.000
The rates are based on criterion below and good for the time when they are
quoted:
Loan $ >=400K, FICO>=740, LTV<=80%( SFH) or 75%( Condo), primary residence.
There is no point, no fee for refinance but there is fee for purchase loan.
Rate change is subject to loan amount,... 阅读全帖 |
|
l******a
发帖数: 16364 | 4 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
poisonous (poisonous) 于 (Fri Jun 15 16:01:12 2012, 美东) 提到:
难道就是因为他是单身母亲养大的，我儿是double income family的？一样的教育环境
，一样的课外活动，一样的成绩，一样的社区服务，但不一样的肤色决定了不同的命运
。这在一个标榜平等的社会里公平吗？
说到弱势群体，难道我们不是弱势群体吗？孩子们上学要傅双倍的努力。还担心被划入
nerd的行列。从一出生他们就没有在同一起跑线上，这对他们不公平。谁是犹太人没有
写在脸上，但谁是亚裔，一眼便知，一生也不会变。
在美国屁大的事都有人去小白楼举牌子，我们也应voice out,为我们的下一代，为我们
的族裔。我要建议员！
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
mamallama (dahema) 于 (Fri Jun 15 16:02:07 2012, 美东) 提到:
举牌子，去抗议！
☆────────────────────... 阅读全帖 |
|
a*****g
发帖数: 19398 | 5 我一直说 common core 出的问题，现在终于有其他人出文章了
http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/11/math-showi
Common Core-era rules that force kids to diagram their thought processes can
make the equations a lot more confusing than they need to be.
Rogelio V. Solis / AP
At a middle school in California, the state testing in math was underway via
the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) exam. A girl pointed to
the problem on the computer screen and asked “What do I do?” The proctor
read the instruc... 阅读全帖 |
|
u*****a
发帖数: 6276 | 6 首先，历史上给美国最高法院输送大法官最多的法学院，非哈佛莫属。总共输送了十五
名毕业生，另有四名没毕业的也最终成为大法官。
回到平权政策在美国最高法院的几次大案来说，一开始哈佛的录取政策，是属于背景材
料来读的。头一次进入“法眼”是 1978 年。 当时的大法官 Powell （哈佛 LLM 毕业
生），大力推崇哈佛的 hollistic 录取制度。他主笔了下面一个重要案例。
Regents of Univ. of California v. Bakke 438 U.S. 265 (1978)
APPENDIX TO OPINION OF POWELL, J.
Harvard College Admissions Program [Footnote 55]
For the past 30 years, Harvard College has received each year applications
for admission that greatly exceed the number of places in the freshman class
. The number of... 阅读全帖 |
|
m*******s
发帖数: 758 | 7 http://www.lnm.cn/wei/
温州事故的三个月前：
最近文章
1. Yujie Wei, An extended strain energy density failure criterion by
differentiating volumetric and distortional deformation. the Journal of the
Mechanics and Physics of Solids, revised, 6/2011.
2. Y. Chen, M. Jiang, Y Wei, L. Dai. Failure criterion for metallic glasses,
Phil. Magazine, revised, 6/2011.
3. 魏宇杰，中国高铁经得起考验，《中国经济周刊》2011年第9期，《人民日报》网络
转载，原文
－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－－
文章写的不错：既有政治特色，MIT和中科院两顶帽子给老百姓权威感，
又有科学辩证观，查起帐来也圆的过去。
真是准海龟学习的楷模。
中国的高铁安不... 阅读全帖 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 8 咱们书接上回。2007年致股东信，中篇（后面有可能有中下、中下下、下、末篇等，取
决于我的阅读进度）。
A truly great business must have an enduring “moat” that protects
excellent returns on invested
capital. The dynamics of capitalism guarantee that competitors will
repeatedly assault any business
“castle” that is earning high returns. Therefore a formidable barrier such
as a company’s being the lowcost
producer (GEICO, Costco) or possessing a powerful world-wide brand (Coca-
Cola, Gillette, American
Express) is essential for sustained success. ... 阅读全帖 |
|
l******5
发帖数: 3030 | 9 EB1A, NSC, 绿了, 一年多的征程结束了, 俺老大想写点流水账以及
经验与教训, 超长, 希望能给正在准备申请绿卡, 特别是拿到I-140 RFE
的同学一点帮助. 对于I-140已过, 甚至拿到绿卡的, 请迅速飘过.
Timeline:
140(attorney) RD: 06/24
DIY 140PP RD: 07/17
140RFE: 07/27
DIY 140RFE RD: 09/30
140 AD: 10/01
DIY 485 RD: 10/13
FP 11/06 (three soft LUDs after FP, 11/06, 11/08, 11/09)
485 AD: 12/03 (no any LUD before the approval, EAD was approved 12/08, AP was approved 12/14)
Background:
1. Award: "Science and Technology Progress Award" granted by Ministry of
Education of China; “National... 阅读全帖 |
|
c*********n
发帖数: 18 | 10 Suggest you reply RFE criterion by criterion. basically following the list
of the claimed requirements for EB1. |
|
t******o
发帖数: 149 | 11 My background:
PhD from top US school;
~10 Journal papers + ~10 conference papers;
~20 self-citation + ~2 independent citations;
Below is my RFE letter. Please help! Thx!
My RFE:
The record claims you meet criteria numbers two, four, five and six of Title
8 Code of Federal Regulations Part 204.5(h)(3).
The record shows you do meet criterion number four. However, the record is
more problematic regarding the remaining criteria.
Regarding the second criterion, the record establishes you belong |
|
b*******1
发帖数: 1352 | 12 2009年9月29日,deny. 理由:
Counsel's response to the director's request for additional evidence states
that the petitioner does not claim to meet this criterion and counsel does
not challenge the director's failure to address this criterion on appeal. We
note that the petitioner initially submitted evidence of his membership in
Sigma Xi, which requires a "noteworthy" achievement. According to the
material submitted initially, however, a
"noteworthy" achievement is defined as a publication, patent, wri |
|
c*****e
发帖数: 167 | 13 I think this can be treated as evidence under the criterion 'published
materials about your work',
but only one evidence doesn't guarantee 'you are outstanding' and 'you get
wide attention'. So the criterion still could be 'not met'
Same as you did review, but only for a couple of times.
You need to find at least 3 different places that write about your work I
think. |
|
T****O
发帖数: 407 | 14 This criterion is clearly about the reviews in professional journals that
introduce/analyze your published work. Typical examples are "Perspectives"
of Science and "News & Views" of "Nature". Almost every prominent journal
has such a section. If your work had been reviewed, you would know about it
before anyone else, because the editors usually give the authors a heads-up
first.
As for quotations, even for large ones, I would suggest excising caution.
This criterion is the 3rd in the list, p... 阅读全帖 |
|
T****O
发帖数: 407 | 15 If the media reports are detailed ones and highlighted or focused on your
research results, you probably want
to claim that criterion as well. IMO, it is much better than contribution/
authorship/reviewing. But you may
want to give the documents to an attorney for a review first. The media
reports criterion is a big one and yet a
tricky one. If not handled properly, it becomes a guaranteed Fail. |
|
r******r
发帖数: 19 | 16 今天刚刚收到律师转发的REF notice from NSC, 向大家请教应该如何应对.
在REF信中说" The beneficiary has met at least three criteria. However, the
totality of the evidence must establish that the beneficiary is recognized
internationally as outstanding in the academic field specified in the
petition. Please provide further evidence that the beneficiary's articles
have been widely cited providing evidence that he is recognized
internationally as outstanding in the academic field".
是不是说USCIS 认为我文章被引用的证据不足呢?
我的背景:
08 US PhD (学校较... 阅读全帖 |
|
l******t
发帖数: 2243 | 17 seems like you have to provide more information about your citations such as
cited by ppl around the world etc.
bless!
发信人: realizer (再来一次), 信区: Immigration
标 题: EB1-b REF 求助
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Mar 22 00:18:53 2011, 美东)
今天刚刚收到律师转发的REF notice from NSC, 向大家请教应该如何应对.
在REF信中说" The beneficiary has met at least three criteria. However, the
totality of the evidence must establish that the beneficiary is recognized
internationally as outstanding in the academic field specified in the
petition. Please... 阅读全帖 |
|
T****O
发帖数: 407 | 18 Looks like the key is Contribution. Did you lay out specifics when you
discuss this criterion in your initial application package? You may gather
a few more letters to emphasize it.
As it was pointed out, you have co-authored papers. My impression is that
you didn't discuss exactly what you had contributed significantly in those
papers. The adjudicator's comment was essentially asking you tell him/her:
what extraordinary things did you do? You see, they have automatically
filled out the Me... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
|
s******e
发帖数: 841 | 21 刚收到RFE，IO# 1088，版上有回复这个IO的童鞋吗？置底的统计没有这个人。
把十条都列了，contribution，authorship，review这三条单独都met了，但是review
是“met the plain language of this criterion",可是最后总结的时候又说"the
beneficiary has not met at least three of the ten criteria."这是为什么呢，难
道是因为我的review这一项还不够强？但是contribution和authorship都写了是met
this criterion.
BTW,我交材料的时候review了8个杂志15篇，现在又多了两篇，等回复RFE的时候增加到
20篇不知道是不是够了。而且，我当时没有editor的证明信，只有审稿的email，是不
是要几封editor的证明信会有帮助？
最后还是指明了要证明sustained international acclaim和small percentage，也就
是我的totality应该还没有满足。有什么好办法可以证明... 阅读全帖 |
|
R********s
发帖数: 3420 | 22 Cong!
09.
TrueStory and Oany for suggesting on my RFE.
role) if you have a good relationship with your employer and your school
lab. The key is the criterion v (contributions) must be strong (engineering
achievements usually are physically existing, so you can work on them and
make them strong). Then basing on the contributions you can let your advisor
(s), professors, managers, co-workers write Letters of Support saying how
critical the role you performed in the organization: is. Notice: 1)by... 阅读全帖 |
|
n****y
发帖数: 819 | 23 cong!
09.
TrueStory and Oany for suggesting on my RFE.
role) if you have a good relationship with your employer and your school
lab. The key is the criterion v (contributions) must be strong (engineering
achievements usually are physically existing, so you can work on them and
make them strong). Then basing on the contributions you can let your advisor
(s), professors, managers, co-workers write Letters of Support saying how
critical the role you performed in the organization: is. Notice: 1)by... 阅读全帖 |
|
s***a
发帖数: 7433 | 24 cong
09.
TrueStory and Oany for suggesting on my RFE.
role) if you have a good relationship with your employer and your school
lab. The key is the criterion v (contributions) must be strong (engineering
achievements usually are physically existing, so you can work on them and
make them strong). Then basing on the contributions you can let your advisor
(s), professors, managers, co-workers write Letters of Support saying how
critical the role you performed in the organization: is. Notice: 1)by ... 阅读全帖 |
|
w*******e
发帖数: 22 | 25 现在是新标准，除了satisfy 2 criteria, you also have to satisfy the totality
criterion: Recognized internationally as outstanding in the academic field.
I failed in the totality criterion. |
|
c***a
发帖数: 56 | 26 今天收到RFE，承认authorship 和 review， 否认contribution, 主要是说不能证明
of major significance. 以下是我的case 和 RFE，我有些问题，希望各位给些意见。
我的背景：
EE/CS 16 journal/confernece papers
about 100 citations from 24 countries,
dataset requests from 15 countries
70+ reviews，
7 recommendation letters
1，TSC XM1172 是否是新人？我考古了一下，好像没人提到？
2，IO只就推荐信挑了毛病，说contribution 没有 of major significance, 根本没提
我提交的其他objective documentary evidence. 我可不可以找同样的推荐人重新写推
荐信，还是非得要不同推荐人的信？
3, 可能因为我提供的材料太多，IO好像没有仔细看。是否可以按照IO的要求重提一遍
，再从头到尾的Exhibit一遍，还是取其精华，再加上新的... 阅读全帖 |
|
L******t
发帖数: 132 | 27 公司律师不给看全文的内容，只是给摘抄了下边的东西让准备着。他们到十月中旬才处
理我的 case，ｄｅａｄｌｉｎｅ 是 １２／０２。我也读了很多版上的经典贴，不
过还是希望大家再给点建议，谢谢！具体背景在后边。
Contribution 不过是不是 EB1b 硬伤啊？
(iv) Evidence of the beneficiary's participation, either individually or on
a panel, as the judge of the work of others in the same or an allied
academic field.
This criterion has been met.
(vi) Evidence of the beneficiary's authorship of scholarly books or articles
(in scholarly journals with international circulation) in the academic
field
This criterion has bee... 阅读全帖 |
|
b*********r
发帖数: 15 | 28 The petitioner claims to have satisfied this criterion by virtue of his
membership in) Sigma Xi.
According to the bylaws the petitioner submitted as evidence
for the American Vacuum Society, the society does not require demonstrative
outstanding achievement as a
prerequisite for membership. Sigma Xi is a scientific research society.
According to the Sigma Xi web site,
“Membership in Sigma Xi is by nomination and is conferred in one of two
ways. Full Membership is
conferred upon any individual wh... 阅读全帖 |
|
b*********r
发帖数: 15 | 29 我有十几篇引用都是国内的杂志或者论文. 虽然我提供了翻译,但IO估计找不到.
You have provided evidence of citations of the beneficiary’s work.
You claim to have satisfied this criterion by virtue of having been
frequently cited in the works of other
researchers within your field of endeavor. You claim to have been cited 18
times, but the evidence that was
provided only shows six (6) citations, one (I) of which is a self citation.
This criterion has not been met
because the evidence does not indicate that the published material was ... 阅读全帖 |
|
c******r
发帖数: 130 | 30 背景：
US PhD，CS，非TOP学校
9篇文章（7英文，2中文)
引用很弱，约25，包括自引（公司的律师好像把打印的Citation list也附上去了）
审稿16篇(现在21篇),PC一次（现在2次）
参与一个DARPA项目，有媒体报道这个项目，所以递交了些报道的COPY
7封推荐信，4封美国,1封新加坡，1封德国，1封荷兰，至少2封可以算独立，另外2封一
个是校友返校看我的DEMO，另一个访问我们实验室。
2项专利申请待批
无奖，无Membership
公司的律师好像
Claim：Contribution, Authorship，Review
RD：6/6/11
ND：9/23/11
第一步承认了Authorship和Review。但不承认Contribution和Media Report（虽然没
Claim)
Contribution:
You have provided evidence of two patent application on which the
beneficiary was named one of several inventors and opin... 阅读全帖 |
|
b********r
发帖数: 69 | 31 今天收到RFE,急求帮助
（iii）Published material in professonal publicationswritten by others about
the beneficiary's work in the academic field. Such material shall include
the title, date, and author of the material, and any necessary translation
The record indicates that the beneficiary's research/publications have been
cited, and is therefore satisfying for this criterion.
Having one's work cited is not qualifying for this criterion, as works that
cite the beneficiary's article are not atricles about th... 阅读全帖 |
|
g*******3
发帖数: 2520 | 32 The petitioner provided a report based on her/his anatomic analysis carried
out by a US doctor certified on board indicates that she meets the criterion
of being a pure female. Even though further chromosome analysis revealed
she/he has a XXY kyrotype, we could not argue this criterion based on the
issue that is not well resolved by experts themselves according to US
immigration act regarding the undefined condition pertain to the immigration
pursuant.
The petitioner claimed herself as being ugl... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*****o
发帖数: 1540 | 33 我求这个模板是有原因的。可惜只有EB1A，没有1B。
通过看模板和RFE的区别，模板同时强调significance and orignality。RFE基本上不
提major significance，却一直提orignal。我认为IO承认我贡献的重要性，但是对原
创新提出疑问。我回答要针对orignal来，而不是针对significant来，不知道对不对。
-------------------
谈到CONTRIBUTION，EB1A的模板上说This criterion has not been met because the
evidence submitted does not show that the beneficiary’s contributions are
considered to be of major significance in the field of endeavor. 。。。To
assist in determining whether the beneficiary’s contributions are original
and of maj... 阅读全帖 |
|
o*******u
发帖数: 242 | 34 E. Contribution
5.1 何谓贡献？
• As noted by counsel on appeal, the plain language of the
regulation at 8 C.F.R. 5 204.5(i)(3)(i)(E) does not require that the
beneficiary's contributions themselves be internationally recognized as
outstanding. That said, the plain language of the regulation does not
simply
require original research, but an original "research contribution."
• Obviously, the petitioner cannot satisfy this criterion simply by
listing the beneficiary's past pr... 阅读全帖 |
|
y******y
发帖数: 676 | 35 刚刚收到的消息。
timeline:
１４０PP RD: 10/6/2011
REF: 10/18/2011
REF response RD: 1/11/2012
AD by email: 1/18/2012
自己觉得三项都比较弱，在回复REF的时候也没有大的变化，唯一就是大概引用从９９
涨到１０３。我也看了一些其他网友的经验怎样把自己归到small percentage. 我觉得
太费劲，没有用。我很庆幸自己没有急着回复，让我有机会看到了以下这位网友的经验
铁，受益匪浅。
http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Immigration/32143339_3.html
我打印了那个ｍｅｍｏ以及两个判例（都是有大段讨论contribution的），认真读了一
遍，把能用得着的话highlight出来，用在了我的回复中。并按照ｍｅｍｏ的思路重新
组织了材料。 我以前的ＰＬ是按版上前人的模板，但人家的申请被批准的时候，那个
著名的案例Kazarian vs. USCIS还没有出来，所以现在看来我当初的ＰＬ写的并不好。
看了memo和案例以后，重新组织的contributi... 阅读全帖 |
|
y******y
发帖数: 676 | 36 刚刚收到的消息。
timeline:
１４０PP RD: 10/6/2011
REF: 10/18/2011
REF response RD: 1/11/2012
AD by email: 1/18/2012
自己觉得三项都比较弱，在回复REF的时候也没有大的变化，唯一就是大概引用从９９
涨到１０３。我也看了一些其他网友的经验怎样把自己归到small percentage. 我觉得
太费劲，没有用。我很庆幸自己没有急着回复，让我有机会看到了以下这位网友的经验
铁，受益匪浅。
http://www.mitbbs.com/article/Immigration/32143339_3.html
我打印了那个ｍｅｍｏ以及两个判例（都是有大段讨论contribution的），认真读了一
遍，把能用得着的话highlight出来，用在了我的回复中。并按照ｍｅｍｏ的思路重新
组织了材料。 我以前的ＰＬ是按版上前人的模板，但人家的申请被批准的时候，那个
著名的案例Kazarian vs. USCIS还没有出来，所以现在看来我当初的ＰＬ写的并不好。
看了memo和案例以后，重新组织的contributi... 阅读全帖 |
|
p*****y
发帖数: 204 | 37 是撞上1172了，所以前途未卜。具体如下：
1.review 通过
2.Contribution： while these references describe your achievements as
novel and useful and state that you have contributed to your field of
endeavor, they do not indicate how your work constituted a contribution
of major significance to his field(rather than an individual lab or
institution).
3.Authorship: You claim that you articles or publications have been
cited 210 times but the evidence is not sufficient to establish the
number of independent citations that ... 阅读全帖 |
|
k******e
发帖数: 8870 | 38 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
bigwoniu (bigwoniu) 于 (Mon May 14 20:05:31 2012, 美东) 提到:
版上藏龙卧虎，帮我看下吧，实在不知道咋整，发rfe给几个律师，有一个愿意以新case的价格（不
便宜）接，有个说media report够呛，委婉拒绝，有的还没回复。实在不知道咋整了，大家给点
建议吧。
一共claim了三项：contribution，media report，publication and authorship. 我
没有review，万不得已只能claim了media report，但有律师说1a的media report必须是
针对本人的而不是文章啥的，但我的恰是对文章的，IO恰好也提到了这个不足，总之是感觉凶多吉
少，很难address这点。还有就是我根本没有claim这个prize，只是把这prize放到
contribution里面用以支持contribution，但io却针对我的prize comment了一大堆
第一部分
The petitioner h... 阅读全帖 |
|
m*****e
发帖数: 85 | 39 首先祝大家好运! 在版上看了好久, 很喜欢版上大家互相帮助打气的气氛, 现在也恳求
大家多出主意帮我打败RFE.
1. 申请时间表:
140 RD: 06/15/2012
PP RD: 07/06/2012
RFE ND: 07/16/2012
IO: 0450, 也是个director
------------------------------------------------------
2. 个人背景:
专业: 化学, 美国top学校博士和博士后(很鸡肋, 申绿卡好像一点用处也没有)
文章: 15 英文, 6一作; 1 ACS年会报告.
引用: 总的220+, 独立160+, 有一些文章大段地引用了我的工作; 独立引用递了申请后
又涨了点, 但是不多, 只有接近10个.
推荐信: 4us+1canada+1australia, 3独立的. 准备推荐信时还不流行不要找大牛, 所
以推荐人基本上都是大牛, 还有一个诺奖得主, 还好没有被悲剧地跟推荐人比.
审稿: 40+, 杂志有8个, 水平都还可以; 递了申请后又多了5个审稿和一个杂志.
--------------------... 阅读全帖 |
|
L***9
发帖数: 7 | 40 我是EB1A+PP， 10 天后RFE. IO 的意见如下。 我的背景在http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/32520699.html
从comments 看，我的major significance 没有反映出来。 我在版上搜了很久， 没有
找到侧重说明怎莫突出major significance. 请大蜜，夏花还有其他高手帮忙点评一下
我怎莫去说明这一点。谢谢！！
(v) Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific, artistic, athletic
, or business-related contributions of major significance in the field.
The petitioner has provided opinion letters by experts in the beneficiary's
field and evidence establishing moderated citation of the bene... 阅读全帖 |
|
a**t
发帖数: 380 | 41 最近看到很多人说找不到律师，或者是交钱前后态度反差很大，或者是和公司的律师吵
翻了，所以觉得有必要咨询一下大家的意见。
我准备申请EB1B，公司同意我自己出钱找外面的律师，我一个月前咨询了很多律师，看
大家的评价，目前想在Daniel Guo和Zac Liu 之间选一个
评估的结果是，Liu说愿意接，但是评价很不高：
“To summarize, your credentials indicate that you are eligible to file NIW
petition with an excellent chance to be approved under normal circumstances.”
“Having determined that your credentials meet the regulatory criteria, we
need to further evaluate how much weight the evidence carries for each
criterion. Based on your publication and c... 阅读全帖 |
|
b******2
发帖数: 30 | 42 帮忙看看，
二步法
claim 4 条， 承认2条，以下2条不够。都是软肋阿
Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, artistic,
athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the
field.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not
show that the beneficiary's contribytions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. Although all of your references
praise you for your achievements and your work in the research of the "xxx"
and the fact that ... 阅读全帖 |
|
b******2
发帖数: 30 | 43 14篇论文， 8篇一作 英文，专利一个没应用 引用〉120
情况在这里
帮忙看看，
二步法
claim 4 条， 承认2条 文章和审稿，以下2条不够。都是软肋阿
Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific, scholarly, artistic,
athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the
field.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not
show that the beneficiary's contribytions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. Although all of your references
praise you for your achievements and your work in th... 阅读全帖 |
|
b***e
发帖数: 1008 | 44 收到0002的RFE,看着信感到挺绝望，但还是想尽量描述详细点，希望大家能给点建议，
哪怕任何一点点小建议都万般感谢！
Timeline: 6.14 efile到NSC，隔天寄出申请材料；11.23得到RFE的online notice，11
.26收到RFE LETTER.
背景及提交的材料包括：
（1）4封独立推荐信，4封非独立推荐信，3封编辑证明/推荐信，1封公司老总专利应用
证明信。这些信总体来源于美国、加拿大、中国。
（2）11个杂志的37次review。
（3）14篇文章，3个中国专利，10个会议摘要。
（4）102个引用，没区分中文/英文、自引/他引。
（5）博后
claim了老三样：review，publication，contribution。
RFE letter的highlight如下：
(iv) Evidence of the beneficiary's participation, either individually or
on a panel, as a judge of the work of others in the same or an alli... 阅读全帖 |
|
p***t
发帖数: 616 | 45 TSC，收到RFE。contribution和authorship没过：
Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific. scholarly. artistic.
athletic. or business-related contributions ofmajor significance in the
field.
The petitioner has provided:
? Numerous expert testimonies from others in the beneficiary's field of
expertise .
? Numerous articles that the petitioner claims references that others in
the field are implementing the findings of the beneficiary.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitt... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*********u
发帖数: 2535 | 46 Evidence does not Establish that the Original Scientific, Scholarly,
Artistic, Athletic, or Businessrelated Contributions are of Major
Significance
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary’s
contributions are considered to be of major significance to the field of
endeavor. To assist in
determining whether the beneficiary’s contributions are original and of
major significance, you may
submit:
• Objective documentary evidence of the s... 阅读全帖 |
|
w******a
发帖数: 362 | 47 让刘律师帮忙评估了一下我的EB1A case，得到回复如下：
Having determined that your credentials meet the regulatory criteria, we
need to evaluate how much weight the evidence carries for each criterion.
Based on your publication and citation record, reasonable arguments can be
made for criteria 1 and 2. At the same time, your reviewer work provides
moderate evidence for criterion 3.
Assuming criteria 1-3 can be well documented, this EB-1A case will have a
reasonable chance to be approved under normal circumstances.
貌似是嫌... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
|
l*******y
发帖数: 164 | 50 Update:
实在是不甘心 又问姥姥啥时才算材料能significantly approved。。。。
姥姥说：
For credentials of recently approved EB-1A case, please see http://www.niwus.com/approvals. Your case would have a fair chance to be approved if it could be filed in TSC. But EB-1A petition in NSC is a different game. It doesn’t mean that your case has no chance in NSC. Every case with basic credentials has a random chance to be approved by USCIS, but encouraging applicants to pursue a random chance is not the purpose of the evaluati... 阅读全帖 |
|
