w*******o
发帖数: 739 | 1 正在纠结要不要找律师 Eb1a + NIW 打包，还是只试 Eb1a
刘姥姥的评估：
The information given to me in your email indicates that you are eligible
for green card application through national interest waiver (NIW Eb-2) now
and possibly through Eb-1A.
I. NIW
NIW is a special classification for Employment Based Second Preference (Eb-2
) that requires either advanced degree or exceptional ability. With a Ph.D.
degree on hand, you have a prima facie case for Eb-2. Moreover, in NIW
petition, a permanent job offer is waived. Yo... 阅读全帖 |
|
v**********9
发帖数: 42 | 2 正在准备O-1的申请。发现O-1的criterion里多一项
- A high salary or other remuneration for services as evidenced by contracts
or other reliable evidence
不知道这个怎么才算呢? 工作的title是xxx scientist, salary就是G/F的标准package
+一点stock (base, 120K+， total 190K+). 我查了一下, O*Net上Computer and
Information Research Scientists median salary在100K左右，具体公司所在州的话.
劳工部数据库（flcdatacenter） 上level4 也就是$118,498 year。 可以claim这一项
criterion吗？
我看板上好像还没有人claim过这么一项(1a 也是可以claim的）。 是不是一定要到1M
以上的salary才好意思claim啊。如果是这样的话，我也就死了这个心了。
多谢大牛们指导。 |
|
k****n
发帖数: 162 | 3 RFE IO questions:
(i) Documentation of the beneficiary’s receipt of lesser nationally or
internationally recognized prize or awards for excellence in the field of
endeavor:
You submitted the following evidence in support of the criterion:
• Research grant awarded from XXX University, $xxxx
• Research grant awarded from XXX University, $xxxx
• No evidence was submitted as to the criteria used in the
selection of either award. However, based on the title of the awards... 阅读全帖 |
|
D****t
发帖数: 422 | 4 DIY EB1A 2月中旬寄出的申请，等到了9月中旬， 等来了RFE, IO 是EX0153 有人跟我
是同一个IO的么？
承认authorship和review，不认contribution，感觉IO需要推荐信提具体的贡献，给出
硬证据。原文在最下面。
背景：
化学和药理方面
15 paper , 3 first author paper
citation 58
review 16
reference: 老板一封 （美国），剩下的是独立推荐人，美国 1个，英国一个，日本一
个，加拿大一个。还有一个journal的editor，用来说review的。
有篇文章有报道，但没我名字，只有老板的名字，原始材料提供了，不知道IO 看了没
有怎么想。我再想能不能让老板写信说我是主要的contributor，虽然没提名字
有公司用我的实验方法，但只是email，不知道能不能用来当证据，实际上原始材料我
提供了，IO不知道看了没有
找引用我paper的人，让他具体写我的paper是怎么影响他的实验design的，不知道能不
能找到人愿意这么写
还要重新再论证我是top small percentag... 阅读全帖 |
|
D****t
发帖数: 422 | 5 DIY EB1A 2月中旬寄出的申请，等到了9月中旬， 等来了RFE, IO 是EX0153 有人跟我
是同一个IO的么？
承认authorship和review，不认contribution，感觉IO需要推荐信提具体的贡献，给出
硬证据。原文在最下面。
背景：
化学和药理方面
15 paper , 3 first author paper
citation 58
review 16
reference: 老板一封 （美国），剩下的是独立推荐人，美国 1个，英国一个，日本一
个，加拿大一个。还有一个journal的editor，用来说review的。
有篇文章有报道，但没我名字，只有老板的名字，原始材料提供了，不知道IO 看了没
有怎么想。我再想能不能让老板写信说我是主要的contributor，虽然没提名字
有公司用我的实验方法，但只是email，不知道能不能用来当证据，实际上原始材料我
提供了，IO不知道看了没有
找引用我paper的人，让他具体写我的paper是怎么影响他的实验design的，不知道能不
能找到人愿意这么写
还要重新再论证我是top small percentag... 阅读全帖 |
|
b****n
发帖数: 379 | 6 本来就是弱case一个，虽然使劲攒人品share review，但还是被RFE。大家给出出主意
，还不想卷铺盖。
Claim了一下3条，条条被RFE,不活了！
1. Judging the work of others:
The evidence you submitted is insufficient. You have provided evidence that
appears to meet the plain language of this criterion; however, the evidence
of record must still, in the aggregate, establish that the beneficiary is an
"alien of extraordinary ability."
审了五六十篇稿子，就是杂志（化学方面）影响因子最高才4.8两次，4.0四五次。不知
道是否这个原因觉得我没有extraordinary。
2.Original Contributions:
The evidence you submitted is i... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*********n
发帖数: 937 | 7 The ninth criterion listed under federal regulations is evidence that "the
alien has commanded a high salary or other significantly high remuneration
for services, in relation to others in the field" (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(
xi)).
The level of compensation which constitutes a high salary is an issue open
to very subjective determination. Further, remuneration varies considerably
from country to country, from region to region, and from role to role,
making this determination even more difficult. ... 阅读全帖 |
|
g****y
发帖数: 436 | 8 总结了上诉案例的一些判据
[rl]
It is important to note that none of the letters establishes how the author
relies on the petitioncr's
findings within their own work, nor do they explain how the petitioner's
work is being utilized and
applied in the field. Most identify how the petitioner's findings can or
will affect the field, but all
lack examples of how his findings have already had an effect on the field
[authorship,first,second author,secondary,second]
The petitioner provides 16 articles in which he is ... 阅读全帖 |
|
b*******i
发帖数: 594 | 9 Update: 今天收到正式的Denial letter了，仍然是否认Contribution。
关键部分如下：
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. In the RFE , USCIS had suggested the
following objective documentary evidence of the significance of the
beneficiary's contribution to the field:
--Evidence that the beneficiary's major significant contribution(s) has
provoked widespread public commentary in t... 阅读全帖 |
|
h***8
发帖数: 398 | 10 版权所有 谢绝转载
RFE质疑贡献的重大意义，回函重新组织了原始材料，增加了若干客观材料和其它书面
支持材料，没有提供新的推荐信。此外新申报了媒体报道一项。
感谢本版所有无私奉献的人。
Month Day, Year
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
RE: Response to Request for Evidence
Petitioner: Dr. XXX
Beneficiary: Dr. XXX
Category: Alien of Extraordinary Ability
Dear Sir/Madam:
This package is respectfully submitted in response to the Request for
Evidence.
In your review comments, it is indicated that the following two criteria
... 阅读全帖 |
|
M*****2
发帖数: 379 | 11 这几天网站改版，昨天收到paper notice才confirm了这个事实，给大家参考一下；
Timeline:
RD: 08/01
PP: 08/12
RFE: 08/27
Response: 10/28
Approval: 11/06
Background:
Biomedical Sciences
Paper: 26
Book Chapter: 1
Abstract: 5
Google Scholar: 278
review：48
被0002质疑contribution和totality
RFE之后增加了5封推荐信，来自美德英法加，其中一封来自Industry
增加了SJR排名和IF信息，之前只有Eigenfactor
增加了Faculty Scholarly Productivity Index的比较
增加了CNKI的30次citation680＋ download；Google Scholar citation 3个月增加30个
多了11＋ 审稿，均没做，只给了invitation letter
多了一个top6％ （EF）的审稿，给了全套证明
其他所有信息全部回炉重新orga... 阅读全帖 |
|
j*****g
发帖数: 44 | 12 背景介绍：
薄后三年，方向抗癌药研发，9篇paper，6篇一作，1篇二作，2篇三作。一篇一作
Nature刚发不久，无引用，有两个editorial highlight和若干media report。总引用
133次，未区分自引他引。Review共33次9个期刊。Patent一个pending中，但已被公司
contract。独立推荐信3封，另两封一个合作者一个现在老板。
找的律师，claim老三样，直接pp，01/05/15 RD，01/08/15 RFE，落到0444手里，质疑
contribution，贴出来给大家看看：
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. First, with the patent application,
it is just tha... 阅读全帖 |
|
j*****g
发帖数: 44 | 13 Timeline:
RD: 01/05/2015
RFE: 01/08/2015
Approval: 02/25/2015
一个月前发过RFE贴，原贴地址：
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Immigration/33409089.html
内容copy在此：
--------------------分割线---------------------------------------------
背景介绍：
薄后三年，方向抗癌药研发，9篇paper，6篇一作，1篇二作，2篇三作。一篇一作
Nature刚发不久，无引用，有两个editorial highlight和若干media report。总引用
133次，未区分自引他引。Review共33次9个期刊。Patent一个pending中，但已被公司
contract。独立推荐信3封，另两封一个合作者一个现在老板。
找的律师，claim老三样，直接pp，01/05/15 RD，01/08/15 RFE，落到0444手里，质疑
contribution，贴出来给大家看看：
This criterion ... 阅读全帖 |
|
g**********y
发帖数: 269 | 14 大家好，
我5月5号交了EB1B petition，今天收到了律师给我的intent to deny notice。下面简
要介绍我的背景：
1) 2013年12月PhD毕业，bioinformatics方向。
2) 五篇一作文章，都是三个期刊，两个会议，都在我们领域排名前三。
3) 39个引用。引用我的文章里面很多都是用到我的tool,或者将我的tool build到他们
的pipeline。其中包括一个Science和The ISME journal by Nature。
4）6封推荐信，一个来自日本，两个美国，一个德国，一个法国，一个中国。包括一个
中科院&美国科学院院士。信里面推荐的都很strong。
信里面主要question的是：
1) Published material in professional publications written by others about
the alien's work in the academic field. Such material shall include the
title, date, and author of ... 阅读全帖 |
|
g**********y
发帖数: 269 | 15 大家好！一开始准备EB1B的时候没有经验，推荐信也没有针对性写。另外case也比较弱
，五篇一作文章，39个引用（包括自引），审稿应该足够。结果收到NSC 0002的NOID：
1) Published material in professional publications written by others about
the alien's work in the academic field. Such material shall include the
title, date, and author of the material, and any necessary translation;
This criterion has not been met because the evidence does not indicate that
the materials were published material that related to the beneficiary's work
in their academic field. Articles which... 阅读全帖 |
|
j******n
发帖数: 697 | 16 case被NOID，律师claim published material被否，在准备response的过程和律师意见
相左
大家普遍的意见都是citation不能被作为EB1B的published material的证据。
律师义正言辞的发来信，引了他们以前NOID回复模板的句子抨击IO的判断。如下
我回复NOID的时候是否能回避被否的claim？
请问大家，被文章或者书引用，究竟能不能作为EB1B的published material。如果是大
段的讨论呢？
This substantial citation and discussion alone should satisfy the
requirements of the criterion. 8 CFR 214.2(o)(3)(iii) states that this
criterion should be met if evidence is provided of the title, date, author
and any translation, if necessary, of work written abo... 阅读全帖 |
|
H*H
发帖数: 1244 | 17 谢谢看来aao真是法宝。 拜读中。。。
criterion
appeal
criterion
on
2011 |
|
h***n
发帖数: 59 | 18 承认了authorship和review，质疑contribution。总感觉像是简单的模板回复，上来问
问有过REF的版友，都这样么？考古了一下版上，有人说IO在REF里提到PL中的内容，逐
条质疑，可我这就这么一条，貌似简单，可就相当于全盘否定要我重写contribution。
In support of this criterion, the petitioner has provided letters from
various experts in her field, and a citation history to her published work.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. While the authors of the pet... 阅读全帖 |
|
y***k
发帖数: 31 | 19 背景：polymer chemistry
Journal publication: 12 ( 5 first-authored, IF: 4-20)
Citation: 275
Review: 22 (IF:1-5)
推荐信：
推荐信一共6封，全部独立。3美国、1法国、1英国、1中国。全部引用过我的文章。
claim，review, publication, contribution.
RFE肯定了publication和review, 质疑contribution.
Contribution: PL里提交了publication, journal rank, citation rank, 油灯图，引
用国家机构列表, citation from one Nobel Laureate and two National Academy of
Sciences, 推荐信里6人都引用了我的文章。Contribution里介绍了自己的研究成果，
结合citation rank 证明是top1% ，然后加上推荐信的大段内容证明contribution，同
时附上牛人的引用证明重要性。
RFE里基... 阅读全帖 |
|
d******5
发帖数: 355 | 20 求评估，和PL，RL模板。谢谢！
用的律师评估模板。
1. Have you received any nationally or internationally recognized prizes or
awards for excellence in your profession?
If yes, please include evidence that helps us determine whether the prize or
award itself meets the requisite standard of national or international
recognition for excellence, including:
(a) the number of awardees or prize recipients,
(b) the number of people competing for the prize, and
(c) the standard of the selection and whether the prize is open to... 阅读全帖 |
|
y*****o
发帖数: 2364 | 21 April 3, 2016
USCIS
Attn: I-140
2501 S. State Highway 121 Business
Suite 400
Lewisville, TX 75067
RE: EB-1 Petition for Permanent Residency under the category of Alien of
Extraordinary Ability
Petitioner/Beneficiary: XXX YANG, Ph.D.
Classification Sought: 203(b)(1)(A)
Type of Petition: I-140
Dear Immigration Officer:
This letter is respectfully submitted in support of Dr. XXX Yang’s petition
for classification as a qualified immigrant under the first p... 阅读全帖 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 22 背景：美国排名100的州立大学博士，政府研究机构的博后。
文章：4篇一作，6篇二作三作（IF=1篇8，其他2-5）
审稿：30
引用：Google Scholar提交的时候110，现在160
Claim老三样
因为case很弱，所以没有PP，等了10个月。Offier XM0100 承认了文章和审稿，不承认
Contribution。原话是:
Evidence of the beneficiary’s original scientific scholarly, artistic.
athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the
field.
You have provided;
• a) Letters of support.
• b) 112 citations.
• c) Original research as it relates to fungi and bacteria to soil, as
well as the other origi... 阅读全帖 |
|
z****i
发帖数: 172 | 23 今天收到O1REF，主要是contribution不够，恳请版上大家能帮忙参考一下接下来的对
策和EB1A应该注意什么，万分感谢！
背景——化工，千老，j-1 waived 10-14过期
文章 12(jacs, nano lett, green chem, chemsuschem,chemcatchem, acb......)
引用 458(google s) 356(wos) 353(wos 他引) 382(scopus)
推荐信2封非独立 博士老板(兼任2个马普所所长)，博后老板(中牛,美国化工top10)
3封独立 意大利，美国2个(1个工程院院士，1个常春藤)
O1-学校律师(屎)，EB1A-chen law (EB1B只能走学校律师，感觉chen law仔细很多)
O1 RE - original contribution is insufficient
1.publications 不算contribution "A separate qualifying criterion exists to
acknowledge publication of scholarly a... 阅读全帖 |
|
z****i
发帖数: 172 | 24 周末针对RFE关于不认可贡献的地方准备了一些材料，添加一封推荐信
另外老板加Dean也写了推荐信强调critical and essential role
主要申诉，找io的语言漏洞，提供具体例子
1.“publishing and performing peer review duties are considered job
requirements for all research scientists, and while the prestige of the
journals the beneficiary has contributed to may mark him as a promising
researcher, this does not suffice to demonstrate how his contribution to the
field of heterogeneous catalysis have had a major impact on that field”
再一次强调文章是top ranked,增加AAO的例子证明publication的... 阅读全帖 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 25 https://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/33905477.html 之前背景帖链接
今天律师发过来RFE信，至今还没有收到信。对于我担心的文章数量问题，IO并没有表
示异议。主要质疑三个方面：
1) whether you will continue to work in your field, 说我的DS2019上面我说
short term scholar，其实我说J1 的postdoc
2) whether your work will substantially benefit prospectively the United
States,
and 3) the original contributions of major significance criterion.
关于1和2，律师说让博后老板写封信，本不想惊动他，看来是不行了。
关于3 contribution部分，在PL中我有列举很多 多次及大段引用，但都是一句话总结
别人怎么用的，没有引用原文，没有深入具体的延伸，交之前就觉得这是个问题，一下
是信里关于cont... 阅读全帖 |
|
n*****h
发帖数: 204 | 26 谢谢回复,不知到怎么发附件
个人部分具体是:
六个条件下方，前三个是：No evidence has been provided for this criterion
后三个是：This criterion has been met.
然后是：
As discussed above, the beneficiary has not me at least two of the six
criteria. As such, USCIS is affording the petitioner the opportunity to
submit additional evidence to establish the at the beneficiary meet the
regulatory criteria outlined above. The respond to this request should
address the insufficiencies articulated by USCIS in this request. (但是没有
articualte的部分，每个条件下... 阅读全帖 |
|
k********r
发帖数: 12 | 27 先说一下本人背景：肿瘤方向，国内本科学的临床，美国前三十大学博士毕业。现在第
一年博后。一共11篇文章，5篇一作（里面有两篇是中文的）。会议海报13篇。总计
citation是316，大部分来自非一作的文章。一作只有近50个引用。审稿68篇。5篇推荐
信，四篇独立一篇来自自己的导师。四篇独立推荐信中两个人引了我的文章，分别来自
中国和美国。另外两篇没引我的文章，来自日本和美国。
12月26号140/PP的材料寄到tsc,1月8号收到了Officer# XM 1027的RFE。主要的要求补
充以下证据：
1：Translations regarding documents in a Foreign Language
不知道为什么提到中文文章的翻译。我是按照要求有让人翻译title,authors,abstract
和journal这些东西的，还写了certification of translation，并且去找公证员作了
公正。
2：Documentation to establish that the beneficiary will continue to work in
thei... 阅读全帖 |
|
t*******d
发帖数: 44 | 28 【 以下文字转载自 I140 讨论区 】
发信人: nadar (咖啡不加糖), 信区: I140
标 题: 请教: NSC Eb1B, NOID 回复之后，denial
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Aug 9 20:44:16 2018, 美东)
请教版上给我大牛，我下面这种情况应该appeal 还是二进宫？下面写的可能有点乱，
请多担待。
-----------
背景：
a. 数学专业， tenure track ap，
b. 9篇journal + 1 book chapter+ 3篇会议文章， 160 citations （google scholar）
c. 30 + reviews， 参加过一次nsf panel review
claim 老三样： authorship，judge，contribution
------------
timeline:
06/29/2018 initial petition received at NSC
07/06/2018 NOID issued
08/04/2018 NOID response received ... 阅读全帖 |
|
d**x
发帖数: 160 | 29 呵呵，我忘了，这是日本版。不能说日本的差
just want to remind you, sometimes, international really is a criterion for
choosing a univ, such as so many chinese students go to overseas in a lot of
univ that are much worse than tsinghua or beida.
more
famous
criterion |
|
H******S
发帖数: 6011 | 30 Original Post:
http://www.gundigest.com/gun-blogs/books/concealed-carry-when-c
When can you use deadly force? The short answer is that your attacker must
possess the ability and opportunity to do you grave harm—but you must also
have to have done everything in your ability to avoid a confrontation.
In the new Gun Digest book Armed: The Essential Guide to Concealed Carry,
author Bruce Eimer, Ph.D., provides more insight to this point:
Here’s a guy holding a knife in an aggressive manner. Can you ... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
s****t
发帖数: 17096 | 32 车强求的玩家也要玩别的游戏，天天只玩车强求的对MS也没啥太大益处，一年就买那几
个游戏
像我这样的主要不玩车强求，偶尔买个车或者球的才有市场潜力。不过我也除外，因为
我买别的游戏很多，只不过不玩车强求。我买了NFS hot pursuit和most wanted，我觉
得都是好游戏，凭良心说这几代NFS，criterion的品质最高。但是主流玩家说了，most
wanted他们不喜欢，结果Criterion宣布不再参与NFS。主流玩家意见一统江湖！ |
|
s****t
发帖数: 17096 | 33 刚查了一下这个游戏
发现这个游戏虽然名义上不是criterion做的
但实际是个去年新成立的组，90%的人来自criterion
怪不得整个游戏就是hot pursuit的升级版 |
|
s****t
发帖数: 17096 | 34 amazon写的，所以只能用英文，将就看吧。吐槽比较多。。玩了十几个小时了
Feels a bit short of racing, February 1, 2014
I consider myself a fan of the new NSF series (hot pursuit, most wanted etc.
.). My favorite is hot pursuit and tht's why I purchased Rivals which is
supposed to be the successor of the previous cop-racers feast. And best of
all Criterion was involved in the production (the team that made hot pursuit
and most wanted) which got me really excited. So... here are a few things
why I am giving this game 3 starts inste... 阅读全帖 |
|
R****e
发帖数: 878 | 35 DVD Talk: 主要是论坛部分。估计这也是大部分DVD爱好者经常访问
的站点。特点：人多，信息量大，有很多coupon,bargain的信息。
" target="_blank" class="a2">http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/index.php
DVD File:
网站设计的很neat。每天更新DVD的发行消息。有很多preview/review。
我基本上只看这个网站的review.
" target="_blank" class="a2">http://dvdfile.com
The Digital Bits:
总有一些DVD发行的最新消息和rumor（这些rumor总是turn out to
be the truth)。网页设计有点缺陷，黑底灰字，看的剧累。
" target="_blank" class="a2">http://www.thedigitalbits.com/
DVD Shrine: 很小的一个网站，特色是定期有精美的即将发行的DVD
的cover图片，比如：
Criterion DVD: 关于Criterion Collec |
|
R****e
发帖数: 878 | 36 Editors' Top 10 Choices
TOP 10 DVDS OF 2000
BILL'S PICKS
1) Fight Club: SE
2) Toy Story: The Ultimate Toy Box
3) Gladiator: Signature Selection
4) T2: The Ultimate Edition
5) Rushmore (Criterion)
6) Se7en: Platinum Series
7) The Fantasia Anthology
8) Three Kings: SE
9) The Rocky Horror Picture Show
10) Six Days in Roswell: SE
TODD'S PICKS
1) Fight Club: SE
2) Conan the Barbarian: CE
3) Toy Story: The Ultimate Toy Box
4) Six Days in Roswell: SE
5) Rushmore (Criterion)
6) T2: The Ultimate Edition |
|
c*******n
发帖数: 114 | 37 是不是criterion collection的？
还有，哪里可以买到便宜的花样年华criterion collection版？谢谢 |
|
l*****y
发帖数: 337 | 38 转载
1. 游戏规则The Rules of the Game : The Criterion Collection (Released Jan 20,
2004)
Jean Renior''s The Rules of the Game was so despised when it first debuted in
1939 that somebody tried to burn down the theater, but over the decades it''s
since become one of the crown jewels of cinema. With its intricate,
multi-character tale of nobles and commoners at a weekend retreat, Renior''s
deft script swings from drama to farce to tragedy with subtle brushstrokes.
Criterion''s two-disc DVD release includ |
|
R****e
发帖数: 878 | 39 April 19!
It's from the same studio (home vision) that releases "All About Lily
Chou-Chou". On their website they seem to also release Criterion collections.
I remember about a year ago I saw a rumor online that Criterion is going to
release "All about ...". I wonder what's their relation. |
|
R****e
发帖数: 878 | 40 不错！homevision是criterion的发行代理，“鬼子来了”也是他们出的（我一度以为
criterion要出"鬼子来了"). |
|
|
T*****n
发帖数: 2456 | 42 去年写的，写完以后就不知道自己在写什么东西了，，，，
关于认知Epistemology的层次
所谓认知的层次，有点类似佛教的判教法，或者存在主义者所谓不同的心理层次。曾经
哲学家或者科学家的一个通病就是，企图用一种单一价值的观念体系来左右人乃至一个
社会的认知。其实认知是有不同的level的，不可能让positivism（实证主义）或者
scientism（科学主义）来左右所有的认知，也不能如同Kierkegaard所谓一切认知都是
subjective的。
认知的层次：
第一层：
Positivism。这是我们现代社会能有公认objective knowledge的通用法则。只有能够
通过fallibility criterion的论断，才可以构建出objective knowledge体系。这点我
是赞同Popper的。进一步的，fallibility criterion的基础一定需要建立在
observability的基础上——这就是positivism的核心认识。我们不认为observable的
东西是最重要的，但是认为observable的东西是争议最小的，最能够构建坚实理论... 阅读全帖 |
|
wh
发帖数: 141625 | 43 40 Incorrectly Used Words That Can Make You Look Dumb
Jeff Haden
Ghostwriter, Speaker, Inc. Magazine Contributing Editor
December 03, 2014
While I like to think I know a little about business writing, I still fall
into a few word traps.
Take the words "who" and "whom." I rarely use "whom" when I should -- even
when spell check suggests "whom" I think it sounds pretentious. So I use "
who."
And then I sound dumb.
Just like one misspelled word can get your resume tossed onto the "nope"
pile, one i... 阅读全帖 |
|
f*******l
发帖数: 8811 | 44 电影狂热发烧友一定对电影的多结局有着强烈的兴趣。一部电影，根据各方面的需
要，通常会设置出多个结局。虽然我们在电影公映版本中只能看到一个结局，但是
却可在DVD的收录中发现新大陆。一部电影能称得上成功，一定要有一个成功的结局
。这些多结局是否经典全凭个人喜好。这里小小汇报9部电影的不同结局，因为很多
原因不能找到视频。感兴趣的人，可以亲自动手淘碟验证。
片中的老年露丝
《泰坦尼克号》
原版结局：老露丝到船头把海洋之心投入海中，脑海中回忆起与JACK相聚的时
光。
另外的结局：老露丝在讲完故事后，镜头转移到研究人员们，当他们在庆功的
时候突然发现老露丝站在船头，众人以为她要跳海，没想到她是要把海洋之心扔入
海底，虽然众人极力劝说，但老露丝仍然是把它丢了出去，让人们知道留下的不一
定是珍贵。最后在老露丝静谧的睡梦中结束了影片。
《花样年华》
《花样年华》
原版结局：身处遥远异国周慕云仍无法忘记过去与苏丽珍之间种种。留下了那
句经典对白“如果多一张船票，你会不会和我一起走？” 之后还是挽救不了他们两
个的分离，在离别时周慕云在对着树洞说了几句话之后结束了影片。
另外的结局：在几年之后的吴哥窟... 阅读全帖 |
|
T****O
发帖数: 407 | 45 This is a textbook example of "reasonable doubt" in murder cases. The
prosecutors presented everything except a convincing motive, direct evidence
links (to the defendant) and exactly how the victim died, which at the
beginning made their story on the edge of failing the core criterion: beyond
a reasonable doubt. The defending team had no star attorneys and had no
key witnesses/materials to crush the prosecutors' story. But, they took a
firm grip on the core criterion and presented sufficient... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
k******g
发帖数: 132 | 47 nile连DSM-5的有关文献都看不懂，连bizarre delusions，nonbizarre delusions的定
义，什么叫逻辑混乱都没有弄明白，以及对逻辑混乱在妄想症和精神分裂症的诊断中的
意义也不清楚，还有什么能力争论妄想症诊断？
I,
nile对DSM-5定义的bizarre delusions，nonbizarre delusions的理解让人不知其所云。
nile对bizarre delusions，nonbizarre delusions的理解：
bizarre delusions就是nile所谓内在逻辑混乱：Delusions are deemed bizarre if
they are clearly implausible, not understandable, and not derived from
ordinary life experiences。注意这两个关键词：不合理implausible，不可理解not
understandable。
而non-bizarre delusions相当于nile所说的前提错误，如果接受前提为真，患者并没
有内在... 阅读全帖 |
|
k******g
发帖数: 132 | 48 你丫的连DSM-5的有关文献都看不懂，连bizarre delusions，nonbizarre delusions的定
义，什么叫逻辑混乱都没有弄明白，以及对逻辑混乱在妄想症和精神分裂症的诊断中的
意义也不清楚，还有什么能力争论妄想症诊断？
I,
nile对DSM-5定义的bizarre delusions，nonbizarre delusions的理解让人不知其所云。
nile对bizarre delusions，nonbizarre delusions的理解：
bizarre delusions就是nile所谓内在逻辑混乱：Delusions are deemed bizarre if
they are clearly implausible, not understandable, and not derived from
ordinary life experiences。注意这两个关键词：不合理implausible，不可理解not
understandable。
而non-bizarre delusions相当于nile所说的前提错误，如果接受前提为真，患者并没
有内在逻... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*******y
发帖数: 46535 | 49 2345
Financial Aid Program
助学金项目
助学金项目开始于1993年，是基金会推出的第一个资助
项目，也是OCEF最重要的资助项目。 OCEF助学金项目针对中
国贫困地区家庭经济困难的初中、小学生，由OCEF在海外募款
后，直接向受助学生发放人民币资助金，用于弥补受助学生的
学习费用及部分生活费用支出。
Financial Aid Program started in 1993; it was the first aid program offered
by the Foundation and is the most important aid program. Financial Aid Progr
am focuses on junior high and primary school students from financially chall
enged families living in poor areas. Funds are raised overseas and then dist
ributed to students in the f... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*******y
发帖数: 46535 | 50 2345
Financial Aid Program
助学金项目
助学金项目开始于1993年，是基金会推出的第一个资助
项目，也是OCEF最重要的资助项目。 OCEF助学金项目针对中
国贫困地区家庭经济困难的初中、小学生，由OCEF在海外募款
后，直接向受助学生发放人民币资助金，用于弥补受助学生的
学习费用及部分生活费用支出。
Financial Aid Program started in 1993; it was the first aid program offered
by the Foundation and is the most important aid program. Financial Aid Progr
am focuses on junior high and primary school students from financially chall
enged families living in poor areas. Funds are raised overseas and then dist
ributed to students in the f... 阅读全帖 |
|
