E***r 发帖数: 1037 | 1 IB 的 RegT margin account, 下面三条要同时满足:
1. current maintenance margin < net liquidation value
2. current excess liquidity > 0
3. special memorandum account > 0
违反任何一条都可能被随机强平。
下面两条要求仅影响开新仓,违反不会强平:
4. buying power > 0
5. current initial margin < net liquidation value
leg |
|
d***a 发帖数: 13752 | 2 独资建厂,计划两年内投产,最终的年生产能力50万量。
https://www.wsj.com/articles/tesla-to-build-auto-factory-in-shanghai-
1531230784
Tesla to Build Auto Factory in Shanghai
The electric-car maker will set up a plant with an annual capacity of 500,
000 vehicles, the Shanghai authorities said in a statement. Tesla Chief
Executive Elon Musk was in Shanghai to sign a memorandum of cooperation with
Mayor Ying Yong, it said, confirming that the facility will be wholly owned
by Tesla.
...
China is already Tesla’s second-bigges... 阅读全帖 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 3 尼玛川总和莱特泽三言两语之间就把memorandum变成agreement了。钦差大人呆若木鸡
一言不发。
上次闹了大豆笑话这次也不敢说英语了,唉。 |
|
u********n 发帖数: 3 | 4 Unfortunately IRS said no to this case. I sent typecheck's argument to IRS and
wait for their reply. However, as suggested by your folks, i will go ahead and
have a try next year. Anyway thanks for your help.
Revenue Ruling 56-164, General Counsel Memorandum 37047, and Field Service
Advice 1998-61 have a bearing on the question you asked about whether a
Chinese student who has now become a faculty member without leaving the USA
for any considerable length of time can now utilize the teacher/rese |
|
p*****t 发帖数: 3693 | 5 http://www.necn.com/05/03/13/Customs-ordered-to-verify-all-intl
By ALICIA A. CALDWELL
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Homeland Security Department ordered border agents to
verify that every international student who arrives in the U.S. has a valid
student visa, according to an internal memorandum obtained Friday by The
Associated Press. The new procedure is the government's first security
change directly related to the Boston bombings.
The order, which is effective immediately, came from a senior official... 阅读全帖 |
|
s****l 发帖数: 26 | 6 还是只能通过公司的hr来找到这个?看网页上写的
The E-Verify company ID number, which consists of four to six numerical
characters, is located on the first page of the memorandum of understanding
(MOU) directly below the E-Verify logo. Program administrators who have
completed the tutorial may also obtain the company ID number as follows:
Log in to E-Verify with your assigned user ID and password.
From 'My Company,' select 'Edit Company Profile.'
The Company Information page will display the company ID number.
However,... 阅读全帖 |
|
a****o 发帖数: 298 | 7 【 以下文字转载自 Postdoc 讨论区 】
发信人: ackboo (none), 信区: Postdoc
标 题: H1b 从学校转工业界 Concurrent Employment
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Jul 10 12:08:00 2016, 美东)
请问,目前是学校的H1b,不用参加抽签的。如果现在申请公司工作,签证会是问题吗?
我在网上看到的以下这段话:
Exception: Concurrent Employment
There is an exception to the cap requirement, which applies to cases
involving concurrent H1B cap-exempt and cap-subject employment. Under a
USCIS memorandum, an individual holding an H1B cap-exempt status may obtain
approval of a cap-subject H1B petition if it is filed... 阅读全帖 |
|
A**i 发帖数: 139 | 8 【 以下文字转载自 WaterWorld 讨论区 】
发信人: Akui (Akui), 信区: WaterWorld
标 题: 咨询:工作中被警告Sexual harassment......
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Mar 19 21:48:52 2013, 美东)
说来自己都觉得委屈和恶心.公司中有个阿拉伯女孩,还是个临时的contractor,好像还
是个穆斯林。我平时就是个说话喜欢开玩笑的人,确实不怎么注意。上周,我和这个阿
拉伯女孩聊天的时候,就随口问她一些个人的事情,比如周末DATING什么的,(天地良
心,我对她没任何幻想和暗示),我还自作聪明的告诉她如何要识别好的伴侣,并且说
了我自己的经验教训,比如我的DATING情况,等等。
结果好了,周一,她汇报HR,HR的主任马上找我谈话。我现在最关注的是,HR写了一份
MEMORANDUM, WRITTEN WARNING-INAPPROPRIATE CONDUCT.当然是要我签字,放进个人档
案的。我读了一下,感觉就是暗示我在追她似的!!!
HR主任其实和我关系还不错,她也和我解释了,这个女孩有点与众不同... 阅读全帖 |
|
v**5 发帖数: 745 | 9 【 以下文字转载自 EB23 讨论区 】
发信人: v325 (elissa), 信区: EB23
标 题: NIW被当作PERM RFE EVL
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Aug 4 09:24:20 2014, 美东)
EB2 NIW (NSC) PD 2009/11,RD 2012/2/2, 2012/6跨州换工作使用EAD卡。
7月初收到RFE Letter,主申请人是RFE 693和EVL,副申请人是693。
RFE letter里对EVL的要求,感觉是被当成了PERM,提到了I485pending>=180d 等,现
在正在DIY response, 很犹豫除了提供EVL+693外,要不要在cover letter里提一下自
己是NIW,可又怕提了多事,万一要是被RFE NIW相关就又多了件麻烦事儿。
麻烦大家帮我出出主意,谢喽。
以下附RFE EVL原文,请诸位参详。
On January 11,2011, USCIS issued a Policy Memorandum directing Service
Centers processing cert... 阅读全帖 |
|
u***s 发帖数: 591 | 10 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
semaphorin (braveheart) 于 (Mon Mar 5 11:50:49 2007) 提到:
Hi All,
As expected, the US attorney filed a memorandum on motion to dismiss my I485
lawsuit. One thing for sure is that I want to fight back. I was
disappointed by the US attorney. She did not even take up my phone calls
after filing a motion to dismiss. She asked two extensions to respond to my
complaint and ended up such a crapped piece of work.(one shit argument she
made is that my waiting o |
|
A*********r 发帖数: 8271 | 11 If a child is making his/her first entry into the United States as a lawful
permanent resident (LPR), the CBP officer must complete a Form I-181,
Memorandum of Creation of Record of Lawful Permanent Residence, for the
child. A child is permitted into the U.S. without an immigrant visa as a new
immigrant in certain, limited situations. This visa exemption arises if the
child is born to an accompanying parent after issuance of an immigrant visa
to the parent but before the parent's initial admissi... 阅读全帖 |
|
p*******t 发帖数: 532 | 12 感觉NSC的效率还是挺高的, 上周五寄出,一周之内收到Approval Notice。不过CASE不要搞太复杂,满足条件就行。
报了三项 (Biomedical):
Authorship:37 Journal Papers, 16 Conference Abstracts (只给LIST)。 业内
TOP。
Judge:21 Review, 业内TOP
Contribution。Citation 539。
推荐信用了07年NIW旧的。主要都是引用我文章的,支持Contribution。
有个Fellowship,放在Contribution了。
总共递了200页证据。
证据的背景资料很重要。
比如文章,给一片全文即可,其他给第一页,但同时要给杂志的读者群,发行量(网络
点击率),影响因子,排名。
Reviewer的杂志也同样。
不能光给个奖状,而不给背景资料!
就事论事,不画蛇添足。我就提符合三项且TOP,用了大学年鉴数据。
没给CV,我是谁都没介绍。12页Letter!
请大家仔细研读一下USCIS的新标准:Dec 22, 2010 PM-602-0005.1
Policy Memo... 阅读全帖 |
|
l******t 发帖数: 2243 | 13 恭喜
发信人: powerbait (Jigking), 信区: Immigration
标 题: EB1a PP NSC 昨天受到收据,今天收到Approval Notice!
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Mar 25 21:45:06 2011, 美东)
感觉NSC的效率还是挺高的。不过CASE不要太复杂,满足条件就行。
报了三项 (Biomedical):
Authorship:37 Journal Papers, 16 Conference Abstracts (只给LIST)。 业内
TOP。
Judge:21 Review, 业内TOP
Contribution。Citation 539。
推荐信用了07年NIW旧的。主要都是引用我文章的,支持Contribution。
有个Fellowship,放在Contribution了。
总共递了200页证据。
证据的证据很重要。
比如文章,给一片全文即可,其他给第一页,但同时要给杂志的读者群,发行量(网络
点击率),影响因子,排名。
Revewer的杂志也同样。
不能光给个奖状,而不给背景资料!
就事论事,不画蛇添... 阅读全帖 |
|
p*******t 发帖数: 532 | 14 search "Policy Memorandum, PM-602-0005.1" at USCIS.
这是IO的Guideline!
其实第三条IO要求的不过分。法律要求provide a statement and evidence that the
alien beneficiary is coming to the U.S. to continue to be employed in his/
her area of sustained national or international acclaim (8 C.F.R. 204.5(H).)
Goog luck! |
|
z******5 发帖数: 34 | 15 回复发信人Italysoccer (AC-Milan)的问题:
博士后怎么说是permanent position? EB1-b 不是学校才能申请吗?怎么可以自己申请?
这是一个很好的问题,也曾经困惑了我好长时间。先回答第二个问题。我说自己申请是
指自己准备所有申请材料,自己写申请信(petition letter)。学校实际上是系里要
做的事是系主任在你的petition letter 和I140 上签字。
关于第一个问题,permanent position 是EB1B的关键,这是众所周知的。许多博后自
己甚至是律师都担心这个问题。实际上,所有博后原则上都符合permanent position的
要求。以下是我在petition letter 里的一段说明:
Regarding the “permanence” of Dr. XXX’s employment, the above evidence
should be viewed in light of the June 6, 2006 Memorandum for “Permanent
Offer of Employment... 阅读全帖 |
|
l***a 发帖数: 60 | 16 关于跟你导师比那条,
你大概可以argue说publications and citations是多年累计的结果,
然后找几个大牛们也是在你这个年龄段有重大发现的,
对比一下他们在那个年纪的publications和citations
和你现在的情况以及你导师现在的情况,
说明IO这种把你和你导师做直接比较,
是把对contribution的要求变相成了对age的诉求。
Policy Memorandum, Dec 22, 2010, page 14里有这样一段, 你可以引上:
In determining whether the beneficiary has enjoyed “sustained" national or
international acclaim, bear in
mind that such acclaim must be maintained. (According to Black’s Law
Dictionary, 1585 (9th Ed, 2009), the
definition of sustain is “(1) to support or ma... 阅读全帖 |
|
p*******r 发帖数: 66 | 17 Google: i-140-evidence-pm-6002-005-1.pdf
click or download "[PDF] Policy Memorandum" |
|
m***j 发帖数: 1215 | 18 Timeline:
E140 EB1A pp DIY on 07/14/2011 TSC (failed once last year probably because
rush)
RFE 08/04/2011
Response to RFE 09/07/2011
Approve email notice 09/15/2011
Background: PHD in solid mechanics at CAS, now a postdoc at one university
Publications: 19 English, 3 Chinese.
Citations: ~300
Judge of others: ~25 review invitations of 8 journals including APL, JAP’s
editor supporting letters.
6+2 recommendation letters- 1 is from my current boss. The rest are from
independent professors.
Claimed:... 阅读全帖 |
|
e******r 发帖数: 9977 | 19 i-140-Policy Memorandum |
|
e******r 发帖数: 9977 | 20 “USCIS officers should take into account the probative analysis that
experts in the field may provide in opinion letters regarding the
significance of the alien’s contributions in order to assist in giving an
assessment of the alien’s original contributions of major significance.
That said, not all expert letters provide such analysis. Letters that
specifically articulate how the alien’s contributions are of major
significance to the field and its impact on subsequent work add value.
Letters tha... 阅读全帖 |
|
j*****u 发帖数: 483 | 21 EB1B准备中的一些心得
PHYSICS,(PP,NSC)
RD:10/06/2011
AD:10/13/2011
不好意思,包子不多,就不发了。写心得吧,希望比包子对大家更有用。
从对如何申请绿卡一无所知,到昨天得到I-140批准的通知。历经近一年时间。而真正开始着手是从今年五月。其中在本版学了很多知识,没有用律师,(但学校的负责人给我们提供了修改REFERENCE LETTERS的意见,一共十信,每封都得到学校负责人认真的审核),我们再修改,再发给推荐人。我们准备材料,学校负
责人最后写的PL,我们按她的模式给了所有的亮点和总结。(材料我们自己整理好,学校FILE)。
个人感觉一些有用的经验,分享大家,回报本版。
准备中的一个原则:有理有据。
1:PL:(言简意赅,突出亮点,适合自己)
我参考了网上许多网友的PL例子,很有帮助,但是每个人情况不一样,所以一定要写一封最适合自己的PL。不一定要放许多图表在PL里,我一个朋友的PL才四页。大家可以把PL里的详细内容放到材料整理中的COVER LETTER(彩纸打印部分)中,以便IO看起来方便。
针对只CLAIM 老三样来说一下。
1.1... 阅读全帖 |
|
b*********r 发帖数: 7139 | 22 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
pidan (派大星) 于 (Sat Mar 26 13:42:10 2011, 美东) 提到:
这个IO看材料还是很详细的,写了好多页,一看就是原创而不是RFE的模板
petition letter claim了contribution,authorship 和 media report,IO认可了
authorship和media report,但RFE了Contribution。
一 关于Conribution:当时petition letter里介绍了文章,9个专利,参加的一些会议
及reprint邀请,5封推荐信。
IO对文章,会议和推荐信挑了毛病。
1)认可了发表的文章,也认可了引用在本领域算高的,但说“any article must
offer new and useful information to the pool of knowledge”。
2)IO说是个人都去参加会议了,无法证明你是top。
3)5封推荐信中有4个院士,一个大公司的老板,没特意指出独立推荐人,结果也被I... 阅读全帖 |
|
j*****u 发帖数: 483 | 23 对于EB1B类申请的一些个人建议
看到网上很多朋友要求大家给评估自己的CASE, 很多热心的网友在回复时会说EB1A弱些
,EB1B ENOUGH.
其实按照律师给出的统计数字来看, EB1A通过率不到50%,而EB1B类的通过率在90%. 刹
一看,的确是EB1B 类很容易通过. 可是既然不是100%的通过率.就有10%的NOID率.而
且这90%中也有被要求RFE后通过的.我想每个申请人都不希望自己被RFE,当然更不希望
RFE后被NOID. 可是看到近期网上一些RFE和NOID的CASE,好些是EB1B的,就想写些什么给
大家,希望对大家有用, 能最大程度上好好准备自己的材料,避免RFE.
IO审每个案子是有依据的,这个除了他们多年的经验,还有就是POLICY MEMORANDUM(
December, 22,2010)
EB1B 的定义是: Evaluating Evidence Submitted in Support of a Petition for an
Outstanding Professor or Researcher. 8 CFR 204.5(i)(... 阅读全帖 |
|
b***e 发帖数: 1008 | 24 非常有用~~谢谢
对于EB1B类申请的一些个人建议
看到网上很多朋友要求大家给评估自己的CASE, 很多热心的网友在回复时会说EB1A弱些
,EB1B ENOUGH.
其实按照律师给出的统计数字来看, EB1A通过率不到50%,而EB1B类的通过率在90%. 刹
一看,的确是EB1B 类很容易通过. 可是既然不是100%的通过率.就有10%的NOID率.而
且这90%中也有被要求RFE后通过的.我想每个申请人都不希望自己被RFE,当然更不希望
RFE后被NOID. 可是看到近期网上一些RFE和NOID的CASE,好些是EB1B的,就想写些什么给
大家,希望对大家有用, 能最大程度上好好准备自己的材料,避免RFE.
IO审每个案子是有依据的,这个除了他们多年的经验,还有就是POLICY MEMORANDUM(
December, 22,2010)
EB1B 的定义是: Evaluating Evidence Submitted in Support of a Petition for an
Outstanding Professor or Researcher. 8 CFR... 阅读全帖 |
|
f*****r 发帖数: 138 | 25 有个移民局的文件叫做Cronin memo,乃去读一下就会发现那两位律师都是错的。
以下是Cronin memo的一部分
4. If an H-1 or L-1 nonimmigrant has traveled abroad and reentered the
United States via advance parole, the alien is accordingly in parole
status. How does the interim rule affect that alien’s employment
authorization?
A Service memorandum dated August 5, 1997, stated that an “adjustment
applicant’s otherwise valid and unexpired nonimmigrant employment
authorization …is not terminated by his or her temporary departure from
the United ... 阅读全帖 |
|
x*****a 发帖数: 972 | 26 好多人来问我要PL和RFE的回复。我PL我觉得写的不好,所以才有了RFE,你也不想要RFE的吧。至
于RFE的回复,我就是照搬AAO的判例,每个人的情况不一样。你如果看完了所有AAO的判例,你自然
明白如何present your evidence and argue了。
最后说一句:美国的法律只有法官可以定义、解读。移民局是执法单位,没有司法解释权,他们对法
律的解读只是他们的个人见解,不具有法律效力,你要是有不同见解,你可以上诉到联邦法院要求法
官解释法条。历史上,移民局常被告,经常被法官判定他们的解读是违法的。最有影响力的就是
Kazarian vs. USCIS(联邦第9上诉法院判例,2010年3月4号),这是two-step
evaluation的法律依据。我多次引用这个案例(美国是case law),在论证我为什么符合移民法
的时候,警告并限制IO对于法条作出对我不利的解读。我觉得这一点非常重要。
Kazarian的判决书你google就能看到。移民局的memo和AAO判例中也引用和分析了Kazarian的
判例。
AAO判例的网页URL很长,你得一点一点copy到一个文件... 阅读全帖 |
|
x*****a 发帖数: 972 | 27 好多人来问我要PL和RFE的回复。我PL我觉得写的不好,所以才有了RFE,你也不想要RFE的吧。至
于RFE的回复,我就是照搬AAO的判例,每个人的情况不一样。你如果看完了所有AAO的判例,你自然
明白如何present your evidence and argue了。
最后说一句:美国的法律只有法官可以定义、解读。移民局是执法单位,没有司法解释权,他们对法
律的解读只是他们的个人见解,不具有法律效力,你要是有不同见解,你可以上诉到联邦法院要求法
官解释法条。历史上,移民局常被告,经常被法官判定他们的解读是违法的。最有影响力的就是
Kazarian vs. USCIS(联邦第9上诉法院判例,2010年3月4号),这是two-step
evaluation的法律依据。我多次引用这个案例(美国是case law),在论证我为什么符合移民法
的时候,警告并限制IO对于法条作出对我不利的解读。我觉得这一点非常重要。
Kazarian的判决书你google就能看到。移民局的memo和AAO判例中也引用和分析了Kazarian的
判例。
AAO判例的网页URL很长,你得一点一点copy到一个文件... 阅读全帖 |
|
y******r 发帖数: 634 | 28 我就是那个问uscis网站上会不会出错的ID,昨天晚上收到email notice的时候觉得很
突然,高度怀疑它的可信度,不过既然有那么多童鞋的捧场,我就权且认为自己走狗屎
运了,上来分享一下我准备材料的全过程吧。
Timeline:
pp RD: 11/17/2011
AD: 11/23/2011
LD背景:
Organic Chemistry Ph.D. 美国3流学校
paper: 9篇 (其实还有一篇是刚发的4作,也没有被引,我们就把它忽略了,省得
average citation被拉低)7篇一作,两篇2作。IF分布: 一篇~12,两篇~3,剩下~5。
Citation: total ~120; independent ~110 (其中一篇被邀请的review,citation就
占了50, 所以本身是挺弱的case)
Review: 20篇。3个杂志
Reference letters:7 封(5封 independent),来自四个国家。
因为是3无,所以就claim了老三样。
下决心开始准备是8月份,在版上瞎逛了一个多月之后,九月初才挤出pl第一稿。那时
很多细节都没有写上... 阅读全帖 |
|
l***d 发帖数: 1828 | 29 http://www.goellaw.com/resources/immigration_news/uscis_interim
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has issued an interim
policy memorandum requesting public comment on proposed changes to the
amount of time that agency officers may provide an applicant or petitioner
to respond to a Request for Evidence (RFE).
USCIS' proposed change to RFE reponse periods seeks to provide greater
consistency in the issuance of RFEs by amending the standard timeframes
USCIS currently provides for re... 阅读全帖 |
|
e******r 发帖数: 9977 | 30 http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e
Q #9. May an alien beneficiary request to "port" to a different employer or
job under INA 204(j) if his or her Form I-140 petition is still pending? [
Answer Finalized on 12/14/09]
A. Yes, an alien beneficiary may request to change employers under INA 204(
j) while the Form I-140 petition is pending, as long as his or her Form I-
485 adjustment application has been pending for at least 180 days. However,
in order for the Form I-1... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*****y 发帖数: 205 | 31 在本版学习了很久,EB1A今天似乎是批了,
参考了很多人的经验,就不一一列举了。
其中最最重要的,还是那个指南:Policy Memorandum, 2010 Decemer 22
见http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Laws/Memoranda/i-140-evidence-pm-6002-005-
1.pdf
该文件是USCIS IO的审批工作指南,我是反复细读很多遍,这样才能做到有的放矢。
为了回馈本版,介绍一下我的情况和申请吧:
一、Timeline
TSC, non pp
DIY, 没有请律师,
PD:7月初,不记得了
Approval:12月9日,没有RFE
二、Background
国内土博 EE
美国做和智能交通相关,其实还是本行,但是申请时填写了交通(civil engineering
),因为这个似乎要容易一些(比EE的来说文章数、引用数都少一些);
Claim: Publication, Review, Contribution
文章:38, 包括17篇Journal, 17个国际会议,一个书的章节,1个中国专利,5个研究
报告
引用84次,... 阅读全帖 |
|
B****o 发帖数: 8307 | 32 Cong!
在本版学习了很久,EB1A今天似乎是批了,参考了很多人的经验,就不一一列举了。其
中最最重要的,还是那个指南:Policy Memorandum, 2010 Decemer 22........
★ Sent from iPhone App: iReader Mitbbs Lite 7.36 |
|
i****w 发帖数: 329 | 33 I found the informaiton is very uselful, while preparing for my RFE response
to Eb1a petition.
The original document link is as follows:
http://imminfo.com/Library/green_cards/EB/extraordinary_ability
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The USCIS Adjudicator's Field Manual provides the following guidance to
center adjudicators:
(i) Special Considerations Relating to EB-1 Cases.
Certain alien beneficiaries are exempted from the labor certification
application process by virtue of their e... 阅读全帖 |
|
b*******e 发帖数: 24532 | 34 second 也没用啊,Memo 说地很清楚。
4. If an H-1 or L-1 nonimmigrant has traveled abroad and reentered the
United States via advance parole, the alien is accordingly in parole status.
How does the interim rule affect that alien’s employment authorization?
A Service memorandum dated August 5, 1997, stated that an “adjustment
applicant’s otherwise valid and unexpired nonimmigrant employment
authorization …is not terminated by his or her temporary departure from the
United States, if prior to such departure th... 阅读全帖 |
|
g*****h 发帖数: 19 | 35 刚才看USCIS的Policy Memorandum (Dec 22,2010)第21页的时候有个疑问。
先摘抄如下:
Part One: Evaluate Whether the Evidence Provided Meets any of the Regulatory
Criteria. The determination in Part One is limited to determining whether
the evidence submitted with the petition is comprised of AT LEAST THREE OF
THE SIX regulatory criteria listed at 8 CFR 204.5(k)(3)(ii) (as discussed
below), applying a preponderance of the evidence standard.
同一页下面列了六个条件:
(A) An official academic record showing that the alien has a degree,... 阅读全帖 |
|
b***e 发帖数: 1008 | 36 有advanced degree,比如PHD,就不需要证明这六条了。
刚才看USCIS的Policy Memorandum (Dec 22,2010)第21页的时候有个疑问。
先摘抄如下:
Part One: Evaluate Whether the Evidence Provided Meets any of the Regulatory
Criteria. The determination in Part One is limited to determining whether
the evidence submitted with the petition is comprised of AT LEAST THREE OF
THE SIX regulatory criteria listed at 8 CFR 204.5(k)(3)(ii) (as discussed
below), applying a preponderance of the evidence standard.
同一页下面列了六个条件:
(A) An official academic record ... 阅读全帖 |
|
x******i 发帖数: 918 | 37 律师发给我的memo太长,这里附上我给international office的回信解释我的合法身份。
If a person enters in Advance Parole status but has an underlying valid H-1B
, then they are not engaging in unauthorized employment if he or she works
pursuant to the H-1B petition. A Service memorandum dated August 5, 1997,
stated that an “adjustment applicant’s otherwise valid and unexpired
nonimmigrant employment authorization …is not terminated by his or her
temporary departure from the United States, if prior to such departure the
applica... 阅读全帖 |
|
G**p 发帖数: 2549 | 38 下面是从网上找来了,但从文字看,AP入境后为原雇主工作,不会被认为是
unauthorized employment, 但H1B status就是没了, 是parole status. 也就是说H1B
和AOS双重身份没了.
4. If an H-1 or L-1 nonimmigrant has traveled abroad and reentered the
United States via advance parole, the alien is accordingly in parole status.
How does the interim rule affect that alien’s employment authorization?
A Service memorandum dated August 5, 1997, stated that an “adjustment
applicant’s otherwise valid and unexpired nonimmigrant employment
authorization …is not terminate... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*******e 发帖数: 515 | 39 根据USCIS的Memorandum第14页, “A beneficiary may be very young in his or her
career and still be able to show sustained acclaim.”
所以问题的关键不是young不young的问题,而是怎么证明你的award是只有top
researchers才能得到。 |
|
s*******e 发帖数: 515 | 40 版上读了不少文章说RL或PL中不能提Young Scientist或Young Investigator Award之
类的。
但根据USCIS的Memorandum第14页(以及Kazarian Guide第11页)所说 "A beneficiary
may be very young in his or her career and still be able to show sustained
acclaim.",申请人可以Young只要证据充分能说明符合条件就可以了啊?
比如,NSF的Early Career Award或类似的Young Investigator Award不能claim么?在
conference和senior professor一起作section co-chair,该怎么吹?(觉得还是说这
么说更好吧?'作为年青学者能和资深教授一起作section cochair,足见比peer优秀')
所以想请教版上的传言是有其它法理依据还只是口口相传的经验之谈? |
|
s******4 发帖数: 1322 | 41 你说的是对的。我查到这个原始的出处了。这应该是pjiang犯的少数错误之一。
不过我也要为pjiang说一句: 这个政策其实只出现在一个Memorandum里,很不容易发
现,而且并不能保证所有USCIS和CBP的官员都了解这个政策。要注意对于non-citizen,
CBP可以deny entry for no reason. 所以最安全的办法依然是travel with AP in
hand.
If
2, |
|
d********g 发帖数: 290 | 42 === 案情如下 ===
艺术类EB1A,共claim 了3条:获奖,judge,媒体报道。
其中获奖,judge都认可了,但是“媒体报道”被RFE。律师给组织的REE材料又太差,
最终整个CASE被拒。
=== 问题 ===
我想自己DIY,重新递交申请,这次不再claim“媒体报道”,更换其它项目,但是保留
“获奖,judge”两项。考虑到不同的IO审案标准不一,有可能会对“获奖,judge”两
项又给新的RFE。可否在新CASE里面声明:我的“获奖”和“judge”已经在前面的CASE
里被approve过了?根据PM-602-0005,USCIS 必须保持“consistent standard”。
------------------
PM-602-0005:“This Policy Memorandum (PM) provides guidance regarding the
analysis that Immigration Service Officers (ISOs) must use in adjudicating
Form I-140, Immigrant Pet... 阅读全帖 |
|
y******u 发帖数: 141 | 43 一直也不知道怎么证明自己是outstanding的,发现了这个贴子。 如果将来申请的时候
被RFE证明自己outstanding, 是不是可以拿来回复IO?
不知道这个memorandom是什么样子的, 是否现在还适用,欢迎补充。
http://www.wegreened.com/EB1B_FAQs.html
Q18: Is there any evidence that would present a strong case that the
professor or researcher is considered outstanding?
A: In a June 1992 memorandum on the subject, the former INS indicated that
the following evidence would present a strong case that the professor or
researcher is considered outstanding:
a) Peer-reviewed presentations at a... 阅读全帖 |
|
s******4 发帖数: 1322 | 44 我觉得我自始至终在这个问题上几乎所有的方面都agree; 唯一不agree的是你认为180
天是假语村言,我认为这180天有据可查。
请注意我说的是“180天”有据可查,而不是“180天以内绿卡safe”有据可查。
你不相信我说的,说我都是“据说”,现在我拿出了证据,应该也没有别的好说的了。
法律规定是一码事,实际操作是另外一码事。我从来都没说我知道这个对实际操作有什
么指导作用。我要说的就是“"180days" comes from the law”, and it is indeed
from the law. 这也就够了。
至于你说
“需要指出,下面的话除括号内的内容外,或许有其出处,但有一点是肯定的:以上所列
的法律条文无这些内容:”
这就是你无聊了。我从来也没说上面的法律条文包括这些内容。我把它放在这里是为了
读者的方便,顺便能了解到相关的知识;但是事实上第二条是能从上面的条文里简单地
推出来的;但是我相信在CBP的memorandum里八成有--我这里说的可是八成,我没有
肯定,如果需要我可以去找找。
(注:如果你不喜欢“无条件”拒绝入境里面无条件三个字,那就把它去掉好了,... 阅读全帖 |
|
s******4 发帖数: 1322 | 45 谢谢你支持:) 不过他好像思维回路和我们不是很一样,比如在隔壁帖子里
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Immigration/32716665.html
莫名其妙地就往假结婚什么的上联系,我个人读了觉得很奇怪。
我说的话,他喜欢重新排列组合成他喜欢的样子,或者他喜欢批评的样子。所以我们也
没办法。
我们在版上回答问题就是为了帮到别人。能帮到别人就好了。为了避免读者误会,我在
这里再讲讲
(C) An alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States
shall not be regarded as seeking an admission into the United States for
purposes of the immigration laws unless the alien-
(i) has abandoned or relinquished that status,
(ii) has been absent from the United State... 阅读全帖 |
|
f**********n 发帖数: 10757 | 46 谢谢你的回复。律师其实在petition letter上已经专门写了一节“PERMANENT OFFER
OF EMPLOYMENT”,我把那一节贴在这里。请帮忙看看是否妥当。因为他是学校律师,
搞过很多Research Associate, Research Scientist的EB1B,这些似乎是routine,所
以我们就相信他了。
We note that Dr. XX is not serving in either a tenured or tenure-track
teaching position. Rather, we have placed him in a permanent research
position within his academic field. As we are a United States university
and institution of higher learning this is permissible pursuant to 8 CFR §
204.5(i)(3)(iii)(B) (see Exhibit 8, C... 阅读全帖 |
|
D***a 发帖数: 471 | 47 官方的Memorandum 里说:
“ An alien must properly file an adjustment of status application under
section 245(a) in accordance with 8 CFR 245.2 and 103.2. An
applicant invoking 245(k) is not required to submit additional application
forms or payment of a penalty surcharge. Thus, it is
the responsibility of USCIS to determine section 245(k) applicability based
on the evidence submitted in support of the adjustment of status application
.”
就是说,交了485,不用自己claim245K,是USCIS决定用不用245K? |
|
g*****8 发帖数: 151 | 48 这个讲得好。大家去翻看USCIS的policy memorandum,那里介绍了法官如何审理案件的
证据。 |
|
E*******e 发帖数: 6 | 49 To jimmie,
你提到的两步法是在2010年policy memorandum里提到的Kazarian court两步法评估
evdience of extraordinary吗?能不能多给点链接和资料?
多谢! |
|
o****g 发帖数: 1873 | 50 你可以说只有大牛才能写survey,列举以前的survey papers
contribution and authorship都可以提,还是避免award吧,这个容易被RFE
cite from USCIS Policy Memorandum:
"Note: In some cases, evidence relevant to one criterion may be relevant to
other criteria set forth in 8 CFR 204.5(h)(3)." |
|