s******v
发帖数: 4495 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 SanFrancisco 讨论区 】
发信人: superdmv (你想咋的), 信区: SanFrancisco
标 题: 这个MIPS有他CEO说的那么好吗？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Sep 15 12:53:50 2010, 美东)
MIPS vs ARM
1. 32/64 bit vs 32 bit
2. m-thread vs 1-thread;
3. more energy efficiency?
http://seekingalpha.com/article/225279- ... n-monopoly
MIPS Technology Challenges ARM's Cell Phone Chip Design Monopoly
MIPS Technologies' (MIPS) stock has skyrocketed recently as it lays the
groundwork to challenge ARM (ARMH), the dominant player in cell phone chip
design. |
|
T**********r
发帖数: 1223 | 2 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: TradeSmarter (Smarter), 信区: Military
标 题: 国人之愚蠢，看看这个稀土报告就知道了
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Oct 14 22:22:08 2010, 美东)
http://web.stratfor.com/images/writers/CHINA_RARE_EARTH_ELEMENTS.pdf?fn=9617327557
China and the Future of Rare Earth Elements
October 14, 2010
clip_image002
STRATFOR
PDF Version
* Click here to download a PDF of this report
A recent diplomatic spat between China and Japan has heightened territorial
tensions and called attention to China’s growing... 阅读全帖 |
|
y*******o
发帖数: 6632 | 3 disagree
aapl is fine in short term. It is still a huge profit generator so far.
but in long term, it will not become MSFT, att and IBM.
The business mode are totally different.
MSFT is monopoly in pc. no competition at all. AAPL is not monopoly and has
huge competition.
IBM is service oriented company, it has lots of business users rather than
direct consumers. aapl is consumer oriented company, I do not think there
are bunch of business users of aapl. The business user defined here is not
only... 阅读全帖 |
|
S*********g
发帖数: 24893 | 4 Why Gogo Is An Excellent Investment
by Kyle Fishman
Disclosure: I am long Gogo. (More...)
Summary
Gogo is the industry leader of inflight WiFi.
Gogo has two powerful characteristics that make it a solid investment: A
Competitive Advantage and Culture of Innovation.
The industry has been growing very fast, and is expected to grow much
faster in years to come.
In-flight Wifi is the future of air travel. Over the next decade, it is
expected to expand fifteen-fold, from a $350 million bu... 阅读全帖 |
|
s***d
发帖数: 15421 | 5 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: beijingren (to thine own self be true), 信区: Military
标 题: Putin 这是要美国破产呀，I smell sulfur
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Aug 14 10:19:28 2014, 美东)
"the dollar monopoly in energy trade was damaging Russia's economy."
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/08/14/ukraine-crisis-putin-d
Putin says Russia should aim to sell energy in roubles
Aug 14 (Reuters) - President Vladimir Putin said on Thursday Russia should
aim to sell its oil and gas for roubles globally because the dollar mono... 阅读全帖 |
|
s******1
发帖数: 4987 | 6 Comparing the U.S. economy to the game of Monopoly, Bill Gross says
capitalism depends on those with capital hoping they can earn a positive
return, and that by holding rates too low for too long, the Fed has crushed
that hope.The central bank, however, has begun to recognize the distortions
it's created, and will begin hiking "the Monopoly board's interest rates"
late this year, "hoping to avoid landing on the figurative Park Place and
Boardwalk in the process.""Bonds, despite their ridiculous ... 阅读全帖 |
|
L***s
发帖数: 1148 | 7 http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/X8VGqSL1yizmoTJX3SLZgw
要怎么做才能再次挫败周二的UC？简而言之，关注两个页面：
打电话重点议员（拷贝链接粘贴到浏览器）：
http://wp.me/pb91eZ-2M
Tier 1:
David Perdue（只要他还没有正式表态，就要继续争取）,
Chuck Grassley,
Josh Hawley,
Marsha Blackburn,
Tim Scott,
Sherrod Brown,
Dick Durbin
Tier 2:
Mitch McConnell,
Chuck Schumer
Tier 3:
Elizabeth Warren,
Bernie Sanders,
Patrick Leahy,
Ted Cruz,
Deb Fisher,
Dianne Feinstein,
Marco Rubio,
Cindy Hyde-Smith,
Ben Cardin,
Chris Van Hollen
Tier 4: 所有剩下Judiciary Committee members
如果有可能，其他的non-cos... 阅读全帖 |
|
L***s
发帖数: 1148 | 8 9/23 打电话重点议员：
Tier 1:
Chuck Schumer（根据前线最新反馈，他可能倾向反对！此人也是民主党参议院领袖，
一定要把他办公室的电话打到爆！）
Bob Casey（根据前线最新反馈，他可能倾向反对！）
Chuck Grassley
Josh Hawley
Marsha Blackburn
Tim Scott
Sherrod Brown
Dick Durbin（根据最新消息，他转向反对，请把他办公室电话打到爆！）
Marco Rubio
Rand Paul（根据前线最新反馈，他很可能再次反对！）
Tier 2:
Mitch McConnell（共和党参议院领袖，一定要把他办公室的电话打到爆！）
David Perdue（只要他还没有正式表态，就要继续争取）
Tier 3:
Elizabeth Warren
Bernie Sanders
Patrick Leahy
Ted Cruz
Deb Fisher
Dianne Feinstein
Cindy Hyde-Smith
Ben Cardin
Chris Van Hollen
Tier 4: 所有剩下Judiciar... 阅读全帖 |
|
L***s
发帖数: 1148 | 9 【 以下文字转载自 Immigration 讨论区 】
发信人: Leiss (徕司), 信区: Immigration
标 题: 挫败周二“一致同意”的紧急行动指南！9/23最新
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Sep 22 21:39:33 2019, 美东)
http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/X8VGqSL1yizmoTJX3SLZgw
要怎么做才能再次挫败周二的UC？简而言之，关注两个页面：
打电话重点议员（拷贝链接粘贴到浏览器）：
http://wp.me/pb91eZ-2M
Tier 1:
David Perdue（只要他还没有正式表态，就要继续争取）,
Chuck Grassley,
Josh Hawley,
Marsha Blackburn,
Tim Scott,
Sherrod Brown,
Dick Durbin
Tier 2:
Mitch McConnell,
Chuck Schumer
Tier 3:
Elizabeth Warren,
Bernie Sanders,
Patrick Leahy,
Ted Cruz,
Deb Fish... 阅读全帖 |
|
L***s
发帖数: 1148 | 10 9/23 打电话重点议员：
Tier 1:
Chuck Schumer（根据前线最新反馈，他可能倾向反对！此人也是民主党参议院领袖，
一定要把他办公室的电话打到爆！）
Bob Casey（根据前线最新反馈，他可能倾向反对！）
Chuck Grassley
Josh Hawley
Marsha Blackburn
Tim Scott
Sherrod Brown
Dick Durbin（根据最新消息，他转向反对，请把他办公室电话打到爆！）
Marco Rubio
Rand Paul（根据前线最新反馈，他很可能再次反对！）
Tier 2:
Mitch McConnell（共和党参议院领袖，一定要把他办公室的电话打到爆！）
David Perdue（只要他还没有正式表态，就要继续争取）
Tier 3:
Elizabeth Warren
Bernie Sanders
Patrick Leahy
Ted Cruz
Deb Fisher
Dianne Feinstein
Cindy Hyde-Smith
Ben Cardin
Chris Van Hollen
Tier 4: 所有剩下Judiciar... 阅读全帖 |
|
A*******y
发帖数: 11148 | 11 The LDP's monopoly over political power has created the same problems as
monopolies in business: inefficient results, a dearth of new ideas and
complacent leaders. |
|
b*******e
发帖数: 24532 | 12 battlefield BC2还是很不错的，经典的包括强手棋，
iOS & Mac App special deals for the 4th of July
Mac
dJay [apple.com] regular $19.99, now only $9.99
Splashtop Remote Desktop [apple.com] regular $19.99, now only $2.99
iOS Universal
PhotoForge2 [apple.com] regular $2.99, now only 99 cents
Infinity Blade [apple.com] regular $5.99, now only 99 cents
Mega Man X [apple.com] regular $5.99, now only 99 cents
Shadowgun [apple.com] regular $4.99, now only 99 cents
Samurai II [apple.com]: Vengeance regular $2.99, now only ... 阅读全帖 |
|
H*******s
发帖数: 793 | 13 first, a lot of them ARE running as charity, and they have to run according
to certain requirements to maintain that status.
second, when did they get monopoly power? sure, the medical industry enjoys
its monopoly power by setting up tough barriers to entry (med school + board
exams + residency), but hospitals are actually in competition with each
other. It's not exactly a seller's market because most people pay via
insurance, which is much harder to bully than individual patients.
But again, th... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
s******v
发帖数: 4495 | 15 MIPS vs ARM
1. 32/64 bit vs 32 bit
2. m-thread vs 1-thread;
3. more energy efficiency?
http://seekingalpha.com/article/225279- ... n-monopoly
MIPS Technology Challenges ARM's Cell Phone Chip Design Monopoly
MIPS Technologies' (MIPS) stock has skyrocketed recently as it lays the
groundwork to challenge ARM (ARMH), the dominant player in cell phone chip
design. Savvy investors see the small Silicon Valley company as an emerging
threat to ARM, the Cambridge, England firm that licenses the processor |
|
s******v
发帖数: 4495 | 16 【 以下文字转载自 EE 讨论区 】
发信人: superdmv (你想咋的), 信区: EE
标 题: 这个MIPS有他CEO说的那么好吗？ (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Sep 15 12:55:16 2010, 美东)
发信人: superdmv (你想咋的), 信区: SanFrancisco
标 题: 这个MIPS有他CEO说的那么好吗？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Sep 15 12:53:50 2010, 美东)
MIPS vs ARM
1. 32/64 bit vs 32 bit
2. m-thread vs 1-thread;
3. more energy efficiency?
http://seekingalpha.com/article/225279- ... n-monopoly
MIPS Technology Challenges ARM's Cell Phone Chip Design Monopoly
MIPS Technologies' (MIPS) stock has skyrocketed recently as... 阅读全帖 |
|
l********i
发帖数: 115 | 17 Looks like you don't know the word "monopoly".
LZ said products were good before, but no longer that good...
Those are typical symptoms of big companies that has monopoly.
You need to improve your reading skill and logic. LZ didn't mention what you
said
As for why MS word could be no. 1. It is all because windows 3.1 released
in the early 1990's. At first it was Wordperfect for DOS that many people
were using it. However, when windows 3.1 was released, MSFT also released MS
word, and wordperfe |
|
g******a
发帖数: 667 | 18 Yankees can do this basically because they are in New York, the biggest market
in the United States (well, this is of no shame), AND major league baseball is
a monopoly corporation, exempted from the antitrust law (this is the biggest
problem).
If MLB is not a monopoly system, simply any one can build the team in New York
and from the market-size of New York, easily 4 or 5 teams can compete there.
In that case, Yankees will not be able to occupy the whole New York market,
and they have no shot t |
|
S*******r
发帖数: 11017 | 19 靠着government给予的monopoly power赚钱基本上是二战后日韩-四小龙-如今天朝新兴
经济体崛起的模式.你可以不齿,但这确实是东亚经济过去几十年来崛起的秘诀.
随便贴一个J/K联赛球队的主赞助商吧,一起来数数有多少个你所谓的"靠着government
给予的monopoly power赚钱"的.
J联赛:
札幌——石屋制菓
仙台——IRIS OHYAMA(生活用品)
鹿岛——LIXIL（建材）
浦和——三菱
大宫——docomo（移动通信）
柏——日立
东京——日本石油公司
川崎——富士通
横滨——日产
新潟——龟田制菓
清水——铃与物流
磐田——雅马哈
名古屋——丰田
钢巴——松下
樱花——洋马发动机
神户——乐天（购物网站）
广岛——DEODEO(家电零售商)
鸟栖——DHC
K联赛:
浦項製鐵（1983-現在；原浦項原子、POSCO原子）
濟州聯（1983-現在；原FC富川、油公象）
釜山I'Park（1983-現在；原大宇、釜山大宇皇家）
國民銀行（1983-1984）
Hanil銀行（1984-1986）
蔚山現代（1984-現在）
FC首爾（1984-現在... 阅读全帖 |
|
j*****0
发帖数: 208 | 20 @Bernake:
Which soccer league in the world follow marketplace? Most soccer league are
playground by the rich or supported by State/Corporation mainly for proud
and entertainment. If you think Chinese Super League is bubble, so are most
football leagues in the world. Only exception is maybe a couple of top EPL
teams or a couple of Germany league teams.
Example 1, Just look at most EPL teams. Vast majority of teams lost
millions and millions dollars every year. Chelsea lost $80 millions poun... 阅读全帖 |
|
j*****0
发帖数: 208 | 21 1) How do you know rich owned sports team do not get politic favor or
social connection in its country? LG/GoldStar wasted $20 to $40 millions a
year for FC Seoul certainly not just for its vanity.
2) All soccer entertainment are bubble to me. Very few clubs ever made any
money. Vast majority cannot survived by its own business model and relied
on rich owner and/or government support. It is matter of degree.
3) CCTV-5 is monopoly for all sports in China in the national level. Local
spo... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
p***r
发帖数: 20570 | 23 I played monopoly a lot when I was in elementary school. In college days, I
mostly play "dafuweng" on computer with my roommates. When I came to US, I
only played monopoly for a few time against my wife. She gave it up after
she lost a few times...
There are quite a few interesting board games. I played Carcassonne a lot.
There is a German board game website, which was the only site that offers
many board games, including Carcassonne a few years ago.
Of course, we sometimes play Sanguosha or Yin... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*******r
发帖数: 806 | 24 从美国的经济刺激的效果来看，就是monopoly受益，小型私有经济更受罪，垄断企业打
了兴奋剂可以打更持久价格战，小经济体打了兴奋剂反而更耗不过monopoly，还得应对
印钞票带来的通货膨胀，更为不利 |
|
h***e
发帖数: 20195 | 25 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: gc01 (gc01), 信区: Military
标 题: 李克强的弟弟也被曝了-烟草局局长ZTbloomberg
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Oct 26 00:47:38 2012, 美东)
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-25/china-leader-s-job-at-
China Leader’s Job at Odds With Tobacco Ties, Brookings Says
By Bloomberg News - Oct 25, 2012 3:24 PM ET
The brother of Chinese Vice Premier Li Keqiang, who oversees public health,
should be removed from his post as a top official in China’s state-owned
tobacco monopoly to avoid conflicts of interes... 阅读全帖 |
|
b*s
发帖数: 82482 | 26 现在跟儿子们玩monoploy，玩法跟大富豪差不多嘛。好像听说大富豪是山寨版的
monopoly……
monopoly里面的get out of jail free card很好……
手握均富卡 |
|
x*****7
发帖数: 4749 | 27 没错啊，你看看，Jul 10 11:06:16 2014, 美东啊。
发信人: bos (Bart), 信区: WebRadio
标 题: Re: 靠，又是罢工
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jul 10 11:06:16 2014, 美东)
现在跟儿子们玩monoploy，玩法跟大富豪差不多嘛。好像听说大富豪是山寨版的
monopoly……
monopoly里面的get out of jail free card很好…… |
|
b*s
发帖数: 82482 | 28 我在办公室一样玩……
没错啊，你看看，Jul 10 11:06:16 2014, 美东啊。
发信人: bos (Bart), 信区: WebRadio
标 题: Re: 靠，又是罢工
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Jul 10 11:06:16 2014, 美东)
现在跟儿子们玩monoploy，玩法跟大富豪差不多嘛。好像听说大富豪是山寨版的
monopoly……
monopoly里面的get out of jail free card很好…… |
|
l*********s
发帖数: 5409 | 29 The brand happened to have a lawsuit against Comcast for using its monopoly status to
force exorbitant certification fees on the manufacturer.
Unfortunately, Comcast has not updated its list of compatible devices since
then. I bought the cheap device only to find Comcast rejected to
activate it because "the Comcast system does not take it as a valid input".
So I called again, with the brand name and model number owned by Comcast
itself to get through the activation process. Then everything worke... 阅读全帖 |
|
f******w
发帖数: 1856 | 30 我印象中， 好像如果你中途要换个modem， 需要打电话做这个swap的activation,然后
才好像会问你新modem是啥，如果你是新plan，online activate好像只管confirm mac
， 好像会自动认出你的modem的牌子，不过没试过comcast不认的牌子，不知道会发生
啥。
The brand happened to have a lawsuit against Comcast for using its monopoly
status to
force exorbitant certification fees on the manufacturer.
Unfortunately, Comcast has not updated its list of compatible devices since
then. I bought the cheap device only to find Comcast rejected to
activate it because "the Comcast system does not take it as a... 阅读全帖 |
|
a*****i
发帖数: 4391 | 31
Dude, there are legal definitions as to what monopoly is, so please,
constrain yourself when you wanna slap the monopoly /hat/ onto someone you
don't like. |
|
a*********a
发帖数: 3656 | 32 I m not sure what you mean by monopoly.
Here I have 3 ISP to choose from: Verizon, Cable Vision and Dish. Forget
about Dish which is not a real contender. Cable Vision and Verizon offers
similar services at similar prices. Completely independent hardware from the
street all the way to the switch box in my basement. That s hardly a
monopoly by Verizon as I see it. As a matter of fact, over the last few
years, I have used Cable Vision and Verizon each half of the time since they
offer deep discoun... 阅读全帖 |
|
g*****g
发帖数: 34805 | 33 Netflix is not a monopoly, it's like Google, a good service doesn't prevent
people from using Bing. ISPs, on the other hand, monopoly the last mile, and
infrastructure was subsidied by tax dollars. It's inefficient to double up
the infrastructure and regulation is the right way to go. Just like water,
electricity, phone.
years
laying
pockets
transmitted,
are |
|
t*****e
发帖数: 224 | 34 Makes sense.
One minor thing, "monopoly" is not a right word. I think what you really mean
by monopoly is market power. And it is the inelasticity of demand for the gas
that gives the retailers the market power. And one thing you are wrong about
is, price is always determined by supply and demand. It is the peculiarity
(inelasticity within certain range) of demand that causes all the problem, or,
the interesting puzzle.
The revised version of your "assumption": Inelasticity of demand, which cau |
|
D*******y
发帖数: 366 | 35 因为在市场机制下都是各firm决定价格，从而影响销售量或者购买量。
而cournot的对数量的竞争好像不符合现实。1973年一篇simulation的文章说cournot不
该被再研究。但是现在不少文章都是建立在cournot的假设上而不是Bertrand的假设上。
如果允许entry，cournot平衡应该不存在。Bertrand 在有capacity constraint情况，可以多个
firm共存，也允许价格差异，那么也许利润也会存在。
还有假定无entry，我的simulation结果是Bertrand在长期会进化到monopoly情况。
joint profit maximization 的定义是什么？是monopoly的结果吗？（就是相当于一个企业垄断）
谢谢 |
|
U*****e
发帖数: 2882 | 36 monopolistic 是 monopoly的形容词格。
monopolistic 用来形容 competition，是因为有这种市场里，买家有定价权，但是竞
争者数目很多。好比餐饮业，卖的是特色，不能规模化大生产，所以面对有些消费者有
比较高的定价权（类似monopoly）。但是进入(退出)成本很低，投资不多就能开店。当
饭店越来越多，利润就越来越薄以至于零（类似competition)。
这类市场其实很普遍，比如电影制作，某些软件（比如email client），服装设计。 |
|
f******h
发帖数: 37 | 37 That's due to monopoly policy, not the system of SOE. That could happen even
if those SOE were privatized with similar monopoly policy. |
|
G****n
发帖数: 145 | 38 But Andrei Shleifer, who won the clark medal is the real deal!
The law and economics of self-dealing[PDF] from uva.nl…, R La Porta, F
Lopez-de-Silanes, A Shleifer - 2005 - nber.org
... Andrei Shleifer Department of Economics Harvard University Littauer
Center M-9 Cambridge,
MA 02138 and NBER a*******[email protected] Page 3. 1 1. Introduction. Over the
last twenty
years, both academic and practical approaches to corporate ...
Cited by 462 - Related articles - Library Search - BL Direct - All 71
vers... 阅读全帖 |
|
s******v
发帖数: 4495 | 39 【 以下文字转载自 SanFrancisco 讨论区 】
发信人: superdmv (你想咋的), 信区: SanFrancisco
标 题: 这个MIPS有他CEO说的那么好吗？
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Sep 15 12:53:50 2010, 美东)
MIPS vs ARM
1. 32/64 bit vs 32 bit
2. m-thread vs 1-thread;
3. more energy efficiency?
http://seekingalpha.com/article/225279- ... n-monopoly
MIPS Technology Challenges ARM's Cell Phone Chip Design Monopoly
MIPS Technologies' (MIPS) stock has skyrocketed recently as it lays the
groundwork to challenge ARM (ARMH), the dominant player in cell phone chip
design. |
|
P**********c
发帖数: 3417 | 40 Ranking them in order doesn't help much. Generally speaking, you are right. The closer you are to the end product, the more job opportunities you'll have. If you are just the supplier of parts of the product which can't work before another big step, you'd better make yourself a monopoly, or one of two to three monopolies that have mutual agreements of pricing. Otherwise it is very difficult to survive because there are just too few ways to
differentiate your product and keep high margins.
For e... 阅读全帖 |
|
g****d
发帖数: 86 | 41 September 29, 2004
Wednesday
In Syllabi, one page description on how to brief a case. Also in appendix of
text, but only allowed to use format in the syllabi.
FIRAC format
Facts - physical events that brought the controversy into question
Fact of Microsoft vs. US
· Microsoft had monopoly power in the software industry
· Thought Netscape would come and undermine monopoly
· Tried to mandate that factories only install Internet Explorer
· Offered ISPs money to push Inter |
|
b********f
发帖数: 20 | 42 这也许能部分解释医疗总体费用，但是解释不了为啥单项检查或者procedure的收费那
末高。前面有人抱怨说虽然账单12万，可是最后保险只付了6万。如果保险只付6万就能
cover所有医护人员的薪水，成本，医院还有很大的利润，为啥医院出bill的时候狮子
大开口要12万？病人在接到账单之前大多不知道相关的费用，相关的收费信息并没有在
upfront 就提供。
医生也应该要通过市场的优胜劣汰，还有医疗行业的收费也要通过市场来调控价格，现在是通过人为造成shortage来达到价格控制。就像antitrust 不是说所有的monopoly都非法，而是通过predicate act来取得的monopoly是非法的。如果是一个自由的市场，最后病人愿意支付那末高的价格，那才是合理的价格。
但是现在由于医生的数目受到限制，造成医生的短缺，连医生都不够，何谈优胜劣汰,何谈自由的市场？ |
|
