f****b
发帖数: 314 | 1 it seems you are getting close |
|
L***s
发帖数: 2944 | 2 有没有达人也申请这个的？
16%是不是一点戏都没有了？ |
|
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 3 If you are a new PI, converted to an R01 and you will get more funding and
more years if you got 16% at R21 review (you do know R21 has way lower
payline than R01). Getting R21 for new PI is a curse, IMO, not a good thing
. |
|
m*****u
发帖数: 27 | 4 What is your priotity score for the 16% R21? Thanks. |
|
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 5 Okay, let's see if having R21 will negatively impact your chance as a new PI
years none-renewable. You have to turn around to write a R01 right away,
and if you didn't publish several papers during the R21 period, the
reviewers will likely to ding you badly in the review session. The payline
for R21 are significant lower and the chance of getting R21 by itself is low
(just look at the number funded and % for R21 at NIH). Also, if you can
get R21, you grant is good for R01 because we all know |
|
m*****u
发帖数: 27 | 6 R21 will NOT wipe your new investigator status for sure. |
|
f*******7
发帖数: 1019 | 7 R21 doesn't affect NI/ESI status.
new PI
away,
payline
low
can
after R21. |
|
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 8 Weird, a guy from NIH told me not to apply for R21 at all, just go for R01.
Well, I am wrong. |
|
v******d
发帖数: 1939 | 9 A few points are inaccurate. Contact your NIH program director.
new PI
away,
payline
is low
can
go after R21. |
|
f*******7
发帖数: 1019 | 10 There is some truth to that.. Given the success rate is so low, it is
actually easier for new investigators to get R01 funded with the ~5 pts
break.
Also, 2-year R21 cannot bring stability to a new lab.
R01. |
|
p*l
发帖数: 1359 | 11 I know several new PIs got multiple R21s. I don't think NIH is against new
PI applying for R21. But if you have reasonable preliminary data, don't
waste time on R21. R21 is so hard, it isn't an ideal entry point for new PI.
My institute's pay line is even lower. I heard NIH now instructs study
panel to give considerations to new PIs. I don't know how much difference it
will make. |
|
m*****e
发帖数: 333 | 12 A totally wrong message! Receiving R21 will not change the new investigator
status.
In addition, before you apply R01, make sure you have enough preliminary
data to show the very possible success of the project. R21, on the other
hand, supports bold ideas.
PI
payline
low
after R21. |
|
l********g
发帖数: 400 | 13 舞蹈, 完全是个舞蹈. 如果你想给人家建议, 请先把 NIH 的 POLICY 搞懂.
PI
payline
low
after R21. |
|
l********g
发帖数: 400 | 14 舞蹈, 完全是个舞蹈. 如果你想给人家建议, 请先把 NIH 的 POLICY 搞懂.
PI
payline
low
after R21. |
|
f****b
发帖数: 314 | 15 Be nice. I think he is a good guy and did give us a lot of good suggestions
which should be encouraged. |
|
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 16 Thanks, I will, but I will still only go for R01 personally. I am damn and
don't have ground breaking ideas...cries. |
|
|
|
f*******7
发帖数: 1019 | 19 Did you talk to your PO? |
|
|
|
|
G*****h
发帖数: 320 | 23 If your "center" means "center for scientific review (CSR)", study sections
are simply various review committees/panels organized by CSR. Study sections
only review and score proposals. (Some contract proposals may be reviewed
by individual institute, such as NIAID or NCI).
Funding decisions are not made by CSR/study sections - they are made at
individual institutes or centers based on the scores or ranking.
Therefore, it is difficult (if not impossible) to calculate the funding rate
for a speci |
|
f****b
发帖数: 314 | 24 it is NIH NCI, the R01 payline for new investigator in 2010 is 20%, not
sure the payline situation for next year... |
|
f****b
发帖数: 314 | 25 发信人: jimny (jim), 信区: Biology
标 题: NIH 今年是不是有剩下的钱 ?
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Sep 15 16:52:12 2010, 美东)
老板的 grant renew 在3月份的时候 percentile 没有达到fund 的线， 今天收到NIH
的紧急email 要update researcher 的一些信息，并要求在今天下班前马上送到。现在
是政府本财政年度快结束了， 这是不是有 戏啊。
发信人: shakuras (doskey), 信区: Biology
标 题: Re: NIH 今年是不是有剩下的钱 ?
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Sep 15 17:39:32 2010, 美东)
NCI好像也是。我一同事去年申请fellowship没拿到，
上礼拜紧急通知，又有钱了
发信人: gardenias (栀子~我不是那个栀子), 信区: Biology
标 题: Re: NIH 今年是不是有剩下的钱 ?
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Sep 15 18:05:04 2010, 美东)
明年 |
|
s**u
发帖数: 9035 | 26 发信人: shmu (shmu), 信区: Postdoc
标 题: Cancer Biology Training Opportunities
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Aug 4 18:31:26 2011, 美东)
NEW T32 Training Grant in Cancer Biology at the University of Maryland
We are very pleased to announce that the application for an NIH T32 Training
Grant in Cancer Biology that was submitted in January 2010 was approved for
funding by the National Cancer Institute.
We are funded for a 5 year period, with 4 slots in the first year and 8
slots in the subsequent years. NCI has li... 阅读全帖 |
|
s**u
发帖数: 9035 | 27 发信人: shmu (shmu), 信区: Biology
标 题: NIH is Recruiting “Earl Stadtman Investigators”(ZZ)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Aug 19 06:34:46 2011, 美东)
NIH Intramural Research Program is Recruiting “Earl Stadtman
Investigators”
The NIH Intramural Research Program is seeking candidates to be named
Earl Stadtman Investigators. These tenure-track level positions are
for creative, independent thinkers eager to take on high-risk, high-
impact research. Applicants are asked to share their ideas for a novel
research pro... 阅读全帖 |
|
c******g
发帖数: 313 | 28 作为一个医学院里的屁挨着地特牛track faculty 说两句。房顶压力很大很大，而且越
来越大。看今年NIH 的paylines 就知道了，NCI只有7%了，据说明年只会更差，DOD也
好不到哪里去。所以cover自己80%的工资几乎是mission impossible。偶今年走运，刚
拿了个新的R01,加上目前的一个，别人支持的一个，还能够再支撑几年。但是看看系里
其它的PhD faculty，有些人今年就得走人了，明年可能走得更多，心里也不是滋味。
前些日子和系主任谈特牛的事，得知即使是特牛了，还是得自己支持80%的工资。如果
有一天彻底没有房顶了，系里会再支持几年，几年以后就只有50%不到的工资了（州里
的），所以最后还是不得不离开，虽然比research track的faculty cushion大一些。
偶问系主任医学院里“特牛”的意义在哪里。答，偶们这类顶级医学院的特牛教授本来
就应该是各个学术领域的“大牛”，“大牛”怎么会没有房顶呢？偶无语了。
怎么说呢，如果你自认是大牛，或者未来的大牛，医学院的特牛track也许适合你。不
用教学，你的研究时间的确大大增加了，这对... 阅读全帖 |
|
C*****h
发帖数: 926 | 29 这是NIH 2010年的统计数据，自己看吧。
NIH Success Rates for New and Renewal R01 Applications in FY2010 ?
Sorted by Institute/Center
NIH Institutes/Centers Activity Code Application Type Number of
Applications Reviewed Number of Applications Awarded Success Rate Total
Funding
FIC R01 New 27 8 29.6% $864,592
NCCAM R01 New
Renewal 183
6 18
1 9.8%
16.7% $8,373,967
$349,501
NCI R01 New
Renewal 3518
775 573
261 16.3%
33.7% $229,173,642
$98,... 阅读全帖 |
|
C*****h
发帖数: 926 | 30 确实有点misleading，写了三个，一个是自己的，两个是给老板写的。
1. Postdoc research grant from a private association (myself), funded
2. Research grant from a private association (for my boss), funded
3. R01 application (for my boss), to be submitted to NCI，我觉得肯定能拿到
全是我自己写的，老板基本上改了几个语法错误。 |
|
w******n
发帖数: 352 | 31 if NCI, you need impact score 20 to get the money... |
|
b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | 32 NIGMS现在不公开payline.但是感觉上是比NIBIB好。NIH里竞争最激烈的应该是NCI.做
癌症的。它的payline就是7%. |
|
w******n
发帖数: 352 | 33 除了 NCI 其他的也不 support cancer课题啊， 我也想找其他的投呢 |
|
b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | 34 确是啊！除了NCI的hard payline 7%.其他institute都没有问题。 |
|
h*w
发帖数: 134 | 35 I got 20 too 8%. NCI has a cutoff line at 7%. They said they needed several
months to make a decision for the 8%-15%. Why??? what a stupid policy? |
|
f*******7
发帖数: 1019 | 36 New investigator cutoff is 10% at NCI in FY2012.
several |
|
h*w
发帖数: 134 | 37 问题是我们是去年4月的proposal。等到了12月才知道今年的cutoff line。NCI正式自
己找麻烦，非要卡在7%。 然后剩下的他们在考虑。正常应该到10% 吧？ 倒霉啊 PD说
他还要给每个之间 的写report |
|
|
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 39 Looking at my budget, I can pay myself, a tech, a graduate student (he is
currently funded by a institutional NIH training grant), and a post-doc.
However, it will be tight. There is also a cut to the modular budget, they
will probably only pay me around 220k (I hope for more because my grant is
from NCI) a year if I'm lucky. I know a NIGMS grant got funded this year
only got 190k...
Since I'm more in the translational area, I'm currently working on another
R01 and a SBIR grant. |
|
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 40 Where do you find council meeting date? NCI? |
|
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 41 Non-sense. My post-doc boss showed us his R01 grant score. Several of them
has 10th of percentile. One of his is 1.6 (NCI) and the other is 0.67 (
NINDS). When I was with him, he has 3 R01s, 1 R21, and a DOD. Also, as I
mentioned before, my socre although is even but it give 3.0 not 3!
. |
|
A***n
发帖数: 38 | 42 PO上周四通知我们的R01已经在上星期二NCI的Scientific Program Leaders Meeting上
被批准。请问多久后我们才能受到NIH正式通知？生怕再有变故。谢谢! |
|
s******y
发帖数: 28562 | 43 太吓人了。
我还看了另外几个所的payline, 大部分都是10以内了，NCI (7), NIAID (8)， NICHD
（5）。其中最让我大吃一惊的是NHLBI， 居然已经缩减到6了。我以前记得这个所还是
稍微容易一点的。 |
|
e*****s
发帖数: 273 | 44 朱莉自切之后BRCA1火了，我听说它是nci花了这么多银子所发现的唯一（或者不超过5
个）真正了解机制（or 可以控制？）的基因。
如果这样的话，那个Mary-Claire King能凭介个拿个火药奖么？ |
|
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 45 R21 is harder than R01 unless is RFA or NIAAA. NIAAA has no administrative
cut even this year...and NCI is 18%. Anyone want to do alcohol research? |
|
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 46 NCI has given people all the way to 26% for new investigator. Don't ask me
how but I know two new investigators in the 20s% got funded. |
|
s******y
发帖数: 28562 | 47 在NIGMS，即使是新PI，26%也是拿不到的。在前几年倒是听说过有20%的拿到的情况，
而且这个是因为那时侯NIGMS 的payline一直都在15%左右，所以20%倒还不算太离谱。
但今年如果是新人20%就已经基本上不可能了。
我知道的对于新人最慷慨的就是NHLBI，明文规定10%的优惠加分。但是他们最近的
payline应该在8%以内，所以20%就算加了分也拿不到。而你们NCI的payline 都到6%还
是7%了吧？他一个26%还能拿到，都优惠了将近20%了，这个也太离谱了吧。 |
|
b********n
发帖数: 93 | 48 哦，赞一下自己的理解力。。。
投的NCI
谢谢你的网站
我是问您投NIH的哪个所？推荐一个BBS网站，专门讨论NIH PAYLINE的,里面可能有你需
要的信息。http://writedit.wordpress.c........ |
|
l***s
发帖数: 841 | 49 NCI的话，有些悬。 去年9%以下都给，12%是一半一半。 |
|
b********n
发帖数: 93 | 50 哦, 谢谢！
NCI的话，有些悬。 去年9%以下都给，12%是一半一半。 |
|
