i******n 发帖数: 170 | 1 你是30%正确.
一个pusher,一个用的FF的90拍,平鸡非pusher,还有一个好像用的是POG,上选打法非
pusher. |
|
a**s 发帖数: 9606 | 2 一眼看上去几乎是POG, 除了没那一个横杠 lol |
|
|
a**s 发帖数: 9606 | 4 哈哈,俺从不看细节。那涂装一眼看上去就像POG吗 |
|
|
K****D 发帖数: 30533 | 6 Chapter 11. 只有POG, Diablo和Tour。他们已经很久没出过像样的mid了。 |
|
K****D 发帖数: 30533 | 7 这个一时想不起来,不过6 holes 14 main倒是有,POG mid. |
|
b*e 发帖数: 3845 | 8 i was 3.0-3.5 when i started to use n90, n95, pog mid, I have always used 重
拍, it helps me improve. it also helps to counter 重球。 |
|
b*e 发帖数: 3845 | 9 #8 is 100 sq inches, very similar as POG OS, which is good for spin.
However, the grip size is 4 1/2. You might need a thin replacement grip to
reduce the grip size. |
|
K****D 发帖数: 30533 | 10 POG OS isn't actually a racket for spin. It's too heavy to average wsn to
hit with good spin. It's still in the classic category. |
|
a**s 发帖数: 9606 | 11 lol xmo用POG OS可以把你旋得找不到北 |
|
K****D 发帖数: 30533 | 12 Mine is 12.8 oz with overgrip. Really not that easy to generate head speed.
I lended mine to a topspin wsn, he played horribly compared to his APD.
I have traditional strokes so it doesn't affect me too much. I can only
use POG OS to counter punch.
arm |
|
K****D 发帖数: 30533 | 13 12.4 oz strung with overgrip. And it's more head light than POG OS. |
|
|
b*e 发帖数: 3845 | 15 If the scale is accurate, you might be either using a older version (which
is not the same as current version spec), or there is some customization in
the handle, etc. Are you using the current TW version, 4 stripe version or
the very old 1-strip version? If you buy the current version of POG OS,
there is no way that its strung weight can reach 12.8 oz. In fact, due to
quality control of
Prince, most racquet are 0.2 ounce lighter than its specs. |
|
K****D 发帖数: 30533 | 16 Yes, post office scales are very accurate. I've weighed the same racket
at multiple post offices and they always matched to the last digit (0.1 oz).
It's the TW version, which is the heaviest version of all (in swing weight,
not in static weight).
My overgrip is 0.2 oz, so without it it's still 12.6 oz 5 pt HL.
No, there is no customization.
I do have another 2 POG OS. Although I haven't measured them, they play
about the same.
Did you measure your rackets or are they (12.1-12.3 oz) the publishe... 阅读全帖 |
|
K****D 发帖数: 30533 | 17 不可能把,Pro No.1 static weight 12 oz都不到,而且很头轻(9 pts?),这个
光看数据是不可能达到POG挥重的,除非内部大量质量排列在两头的位置(polorized)。
老三可以评论一下,他的主力拍。 |
|
K****D 发帖数: 30533 | 18 POG OS不是偶最惨的拍子。偶有一把13.0 oz, 4 pt HL的,最后只好卖掉。
用它水平直接下降0.5. |
|
K****D 发帖数: 30533 | 19 I have never used any Wilson 90. I have used Wilson 85 though.
I have only used PSC 6.1 for 15 minutes, so not much impression there,
except the stiffness.
For me, POG OS tops in the swing weight category among all my match sticks. |
|
K****D 发帖数: 30533 | 20 不光是越大,还不能太重。偶用107的POG OS就发的爆慢,太重了。。。 |
|
K****D 发帖数: 30533 | 21 太冰雪了,居然被你猜中了。
4。
有个例子,偶11年8月用85打一个3.0 pusher, 2-6, 5-7. 亚历山大。
两个月后,偶换成POG OS和他对扑, 7-5, 7-6. 所以这个5是不成立的,偶
的成绩都是对比相同对手的。 |
|
a***8 发帖数: 2433 | 22 你试过prince的POG没有?各方面都适合你:重,软,力量大,舒适。是很多TE患者的
救星。缺点是不够精准。
[发表自未名空间手机版 - m.mitbbs.com] |
|
K****D 发帖数: 30533 | 23 Not exactly. The POG and Radical Agassi used were both oversize 107.
95 was the average size as early as mid 1990.
The real difference between old and new 老头拍 is that old ones are heavy
and head light; new ones are light and head heavy. Besides, 1990's 老头拍
can be even uglier than now. 95 sq in with 30" width, ouch...
The definition of "老头拍" is evolving, just like iphone's size.
Back to Agassi's time, 98 sqr inch is considered as "BIG" racket, and now
most ATP players have racket size GE 98.
Can... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
|
|
K****D 发帖数: 30533 | 27 啥叫有啥说法? 比如POG OS明显比MP流行多了? |
|
M*****n 发帖数: 282 | 28 直接上Pure Drive, 把您的POG, Prestige甚么的都退役吧
[在 KennyD (|-==-|) 的大作中提到:]
:偶的大问题就是counter punch能力极弱。偶由于适应了摆好架势等球的打法,用的
拍子
:都狂重,摆幅很大,挥动很慢,所以跑动中小摆幅完全不适应。这个怎么才能快速提
高?
:........... |
|
|
x****n 发帖数: 2297 | 30 看到他指着一个百灵达说 “这是我从欧洲带回来的"。 我不厚道地笑了。
不过那个 EH POG 还挺好玩的,那一段模仿8弦贝斯弹 Pearl Jam 的Jeremy 前奏还蛮
像的。
EBS MultiComp 是个好东西呀。 |
|
|