t*********2
发帖数: 3 | 1 现在有一篇文章准备中，在这个两个杂志间犹豫。IF差不多，PNAS好像名声越来越不好
，Plos又比较新，是open access.但国内的人好像对PNAS更看重。我以后是想回国内混
得.有没有有经验的人给点建议阿？万分感谢！ |
c*********9
发帖数: 99 | |
p*****m
发帖数: 7030 | 3 doesn't make much difference
【在 t*********2 的大作中提到】
: 现在有一篇文章准备中，在这个两个杂志间犹豫。IF差不多，PNAS好像名声越来越不好
: ，Plos又比较新，是open access.但国内的人好像对PNAS更看重。我以后是想回国内混
: 得.有没有有经验的人给点建议阿？万分感谢！
|
g**********t
发帖数: 475 | 4 当然是PNAS，而且我觉得最近PLoS的杂志越办越烂。别看影响因子，就算看影响因子你
拿一个生物医学杂志和综合杂志比IF是不公平的。PNAS里面和PloS Pathogan方向类似
的文章单拎出来绝对要比PLoS的高一个档次。 |
p*******r
发帖数: 4048 | 5 If you want to go back to China, definitely PNAS.
PNAS is almost a nature paper in China. PLos paper = nothing in China.
【在 t*********2 的大作中提到】
: 现在有一篇文章准备中，在这个两个杂志间犹豫。IF差不多，PNAS好像名声越来越不好
: ，Plos又比较新，是open access.但国内的人好像对PNAS更看重。我以后是想回国内混
: 得.有没有有经验的人给点建议阿？万分感谢！
|
p*****m
发帖数: 7030 | 6 you must be kidding...PNAS is not that hot any more in china. PNAS probably
means JIGE nowadays.
【在 p*******r 的大作中提到】
: If you want to go back to China, definitely PNAS.
: PNAS is almost a nature paper in China. PLos paper = nothing in China.
|
n****g
发帖数: 1063 | |
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | |
s******y
发帖数: 28562 | 9 在这两者之间，绝对选择PNAS
PNAS作为一个老牌杂志，在国内的认可度远远比PLoS 系列的大部分杂志都高。
在大部分国内的学术界人眼里，PNAS 和PLoS Biology 是同一个档次的。
【在 t*********2 的大作中提到】
: 现在有一篇文章准备中，在这个两个杂志间犹豫。IF差不多，PNAS好像名声越来越不好
: ，Plos又比较新，是open access.但国内的人好像对PNAS更看重。我以后是想回国内混
: 得.有没有有经验的人给点建议阿？万分感谢！
|
t*********2
发帖数: 3 | |
|
|
h********n
发帖数: 4079 | 11 以后PNAS没有两个track了, 全部直接投稿. |
p*****m
发帖数: 7030 | 12 believe me, it's not gonna happen.
【在 h********n 的大作中提到】
: 以后PNAS没有两个track了, 全部直接投稿.
|
I***a
发帖数: 13467 | |
B****a
发帖数: 1526 | 14 so you think they will retract their decision?
http://www.pnas.org/content/106/37/15518.full
【在 p*****m 的大作中提到】
: believe me, it's not gonna happen.
|
h********n
发帖数: 4079 | 15 恩, 我刚才想贴这个链接的, 懒了一下.
【在 B****a 的大作中提到】
: so you think they will retract their decision?
: http://www.pnas.org/content/106/37/15518.full
|
p*****m
发帖数: 7030 | 16 这个是取消track III么？PNAS本质就是院士俱乐部 院士contribution是不可能取消的
【在 B****a 的大作中提到】
: so you think they will retract their decision?
: http://www.pnas.org/content/106/37/15518.full
|
g**********t
发帖数: 475 | 17 其实我也认为PNAS和Plos biology是一个档次。PNAS烂文章有，但是好文章也很多。
【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
: 在这两者之间，绝对选择PNAS
: PNAS作为一个老牌杂志，在国内的认可度远远比PLoS 系列的大部分杂志都高。
: 在大部分国内的学术界人眼里，PNAS 和PLoS Biology 是同一个档次的。
|
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 18 Currently PNAS has three way of submitting paper: Contributed, edited (track
II), and communicated. Only the communicated ones are been eliminated. A
lot of edited track two papers are actually very good, and the contributed
line is still open after the change. So the PNAS members won't complaint too
much.
PLoS Biology and PLoS medicine are the top two journals in PLoS. I don't
think PLoS pathogen are as high as those two and don't confuse them. PLoS
One is the true open access and I like i |
p*******r
发帖数: 4048 | 19 Are there also academian's club journals in China?
(track
A
contributed
complaint too
don't
PLoS
won't
【在 A******y 的大作中提到】
: Currently PNAS has three way of submitting paper: Contributed, edited (track
: II), and communicated. Only the communicated ones are been eliminated. A
: lot of edited track two papers are actually very good, and the contributed
: line is still open after the change. So the PNAS members won't complaint too
: much.
: PLoS Biology and PLoS medicine are the top two journals in PLoS. I don't
: think PLoS pathogen are as high as those two and don't confuse them. PLoS
: One is the true open access and I like i
|
n********k
发帖数: 2818 | 20 do u want to star Chinese version of plos one..., I would help:)))
【在 p*******r 的大作中提到】
: Are there also academian's club journals in China?
:
: (track
: A
: contributed
: complaint too
: don't
: PLoS
: won't
|
t*********2
发帖数: 3 | 21 PNAS和cell host and microbes比呢？ |
