k********o
发帖数: 1139 | 1 EB3两个月就有近7千的名额哦。如果包括这个，那再加上EB1和EB2ROW及老印EB3升级，
剩不下多少了吧？8月demand data显示还有1万EB2CI，9月会剩7千左右？那么最后SO就
差不多清空而已？ |
L***a
发帖数: 3674 | 2 不是说19k仅仅是对9月份而言么
那就算eb3在九月份有3.5k好了
EB1+EB2 row估计有2k-5k
8月份demand data有10k
但是9月份就只剩下8k了,减去8月份2.5k
所以
worst senario:
19k-3.5k-5k=10k〉〉8k
错了没？
【在 k********o 的大作中提到】
: EB3两个月就有近7千的名额哦。如果包括这个，那再加上EB1和EB2ROW及老印EB3升级，
: 剩不下多少了吧？8月demand data显示还有1万EB2CI，9月会剩7千左右？那么最后SO就
: 差不多清空而已？
|
k********o
发帖数: 1139 | 3 如果这样，9月的3.5K EB3名额也应该不算的。希望如此，到时候就可以开门了。
【在 L***a 的大作中提到】
: 不是说19k仅仅是对9月份而言么
: 那就算eb3在九月份有3.5k好了
: EB1+EB2 row估计有2k-5k
: 8月份demand data有10k
: 但是9月份就只剩下8k了,减去8月份2.5k
: 所以
: worst senario:
: 19k-3.5k-5k=10k〉〉8k
: 错了没？
|
j**d
发帖数: 82 | 4 " THAT USE WOULD INCLUDE THE REST OF JULY AND THEN DURING AUGUST（EVENTUALLY
SEPTEMBER)"
So worst case: 19k-(3.5k+5k)*2=3k < 8k
Still cannot move over 07 wave!
【在 L***a 的大作中提到】
: 不是说19k仅仅是对9月份而言么
: 那就算eb3在九月份有3.5k好了
: EB1+EB2 row估计有2k-5k
: 8月份demand data有10k
: 但是9月份就只剩下8k了,减去8月份2.5k
: 所以
: worst senario:
: 19k-3.5k-5k=10k〉〉8k
: 错了没？
|
L***a
发帖数: 3674 | 5 为什么不算呢？
应该算阿
不是说19K是九月的eb的visa总量么？
【在 k********o 的大作中提到】
: 如果这样，9月的3.5K EB3名额也应该不算的。希望如此，到时候就可以开门了。
|
s******n
发帖数: 340 | 6 yea, agree..
The original post is pretty misleading. He posted it again, which is more
clear.
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/EB23/31370479.html
O Said " THERE ARE ABOUT XXX EMPLOYMENT NUMBERS WHICH REMAIN AVAILABLE AFTER
THE
AUGUST DATES HAVE BEEN SET".
Which means up to July 13rd. So, this 19k will allocated to Eb2 Rest of
world as well as EB3 from july 13rd to September 30th.
EVENTUALLY
【在 j**d 的大作中提到】
: " THAT USE WOULD INCLUDE THE REST OF JULY AND THEN DURING AUGUST（EVENTUALLY
: SEPTEMBER)"
: So worst case: 19k-(3.5k+5k)*2=3k < 8k
: Still cannot move over 07 wave!
|
j**d
发帖数: 82 | 7 The key here is whether they anticipate EB1+EB2ROW+EB3 demand from July 13~
Setp. 30 and already included those in the 121,000 number. Among these EB3
is constant due to cutoff dates but EB1 and EB2ROW may fluctuate. If Mr. O
did not count these in the 121k number,then it's very possible 07 wave still
cannot be cleared! However if they included those, then we surely will pass
07 wave.
AFTER
【在 s******n 的大作中提到】
: yea, agree..
: The original post is pretty misleading. He posted it again, which is more
: clear.
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/EB23/31370479.html
: O Said " THERE ARE ABOUT XXX EMPLOYMENT NUMBERS WHICH REMAIN AVAILABLE AFTER
: THE
: AUGUST DATES HAVE BEEN SET".
: Which means up to July 13rd. So, this 19k will allocated to Eb2 Rest of
: world as well as EB3 from july 13rd to September 30th.
:
|
s******n
发帖数: 340 | 8 yea, very well said!
So even O's new talk is misleading. Minus/Plus, big difference. It's up to
his own explanation.
Sigh
still
pass
【在 j**d 的大作中提到】
: The key here is whether they anticipate EB1+EB2ROW+EB3 demand from July 13~
: Setp. 30 and already included those in the 121,000 number. Among these EB3
: is constant due to cutoff dates but EB1 and EB2ROW may fluctuate. If Mr. O
: did not count these in the 121k number,then it's very possible 07 wave still
: cannot be cleared! However if they included those, then we surely will pass
: 07 wave.
:
: AFTER
|
k********o
发帖数: 1139 | 9 没看仔细，还以为是预计的SO呢。
【在 L***a 的大作中提到】
: 为什么不算呢？
: 应该算阿
: 不是说19K是九月的eb的visa总量么？
|
