|
|
|
|
|
|
F***Q 发帖数: 6599 | 1 just got the score - impact score of 26 at the 9th percentile, no longer ESI.
asked PO and got the following reply -
"We do not have pay lines – we consider multiple factors in our
administrative evaluation. We will start the evaluation of your application
in the summer after the May council."
any experience? fundable? borderline?
(the initial funding was received 5 yr ago at 3rd percentile with ESI status
). | l*********e 发帖数: 244 | 2 enough
congrats!
ESI.
application
status
【在 F***Q 的大作中提到】 : just got the score - impact score of 26 at the 9th percentile, no longer ESI. : asked PO and got the following reply - : "We do not have pay lines – we consider multiple factors in our : administrative evaluation. We will start the evaluation of your application : in the summer after the May council." : any experience? fundable? borderline? : (the initial funding was received 5 yr ago at 3rd percentile with ESI status : ).
| H****N 发帖数: 997 | 3 Check the past funding history of NIGMS at the link below, you may get an
idea. Very likely you will get it. But at this stage, it is not 100%
guaranteed.
https://report.nih.gov/nihdatabook/category/23 | F***Q 发帖数: 6599 | 4
wow, love this tool! thanks, very helpful
I wasn't aware that NIGMS has such a wide gray-zone. On the other hand, one
can clearly see NCI and NIBIB have clear thresholds due to their hard cut-
off policies, amazing
【在 H****N 的大作中提到】 : Check the past funding history of NIGMS at the link below, you may get an : idea. Very likely you will get it. But at this stage, it is not 100% : guaranteed. : https://report.nih.gov/nihdatabook/category/23
| l***s 发帖数: 841 | 5 应该没问题,先祝贺了。不过要注意各种funding总钱数direct cost不要超过75万,不
然NIGMS会有麻烦。NIGMS的PO从来都是这套说辞吓唬人,就算1%也是如此。
ESI.
application
status
【在 F***Q 的大作中提到】 : just got the score - impact score of 26 at the 9th percentile, no longer ESI. : asked PO and got the following reply - : "We do not have pay lines – we consider multiple factors in our : administrative evaluation. We will start the evaluation of your application : in the summer after the May council." : any experience? fundable? borderline? : (the initial funding was received 5 yr ago at 3rd percentile with ESI status : ).
| F***Q 发帖数: 6599 | 6
thanks
good to know. did you mean the total FY direct cost in the Other Support
document? because this is a renewal and this grant is currently in NCE,
should I use my remaining balance or ignore that grant in the total? also,
does that number include any pending applications (under review)?
thanks
【在 l***s 的大作中提到】 : 应该没问题,先祝贺了。不过要注意各种funding总钱数direct cost不要超过75万,不 : 然NIGMS会有麻烦。NIGMS的PO从来都是这套说辞吓唬人,就算1%也是如此。 : : ESI. : application : status
| l***s 发帖数: 841 | 7 Yes, it is about Other Support. the previous NCE and this new application
should be considered as one. The total dollar amount of funded grants are
considered. Say, if you have two other active R01s (modular $250K), you are
okay to have a third one ($250K). But all grants would be counted including
other non-NIH grants.
【在 F***Q 的大作中提到】 : : thanks : good to know. did you mean the total FY direct cost in the Other Support : document? because this is a renewal and this grant is currently in NCE, : should I use my remaining balance or ignore that grant in the total? also, : does that number include any pending applications (under review)? : thanks
| l***s 发帖数: 841 | 8 Here is the link:
https://www.nigms.nih.gov/Research/Pages/unrestricted-support.aspx
【在 F***Q 的大作中提到】 : : thanks : good to know. did you mean the total FY direct cost in the Other Support : document? because this is a renewal and this grant is currently in NCE, : should I use my remaining balance or ignore that grant in the total? also, : does that number include any pending applications (under review)? : thanks
| F***Q 发帖数: 6599 | 9
are
including
thanks, also thank for the link - I will run this with my pre-award admin
and give an estimate.
hypothetically - if one has 3 grants A, B and C, A is the one being renewed,
say the renewed grant is A'. A is currently in NCE, but with a non-zero
balance - assumed to be spent down before A' starts.
if A, B, C and A' are all modular, again, hypothetically speaking - does
this make it over 750k? or just within the limit?
what if there is another grant, D, that is currently under review, but don't
know if it can be funded. from the link, it says "inclusive of the initial
review group-recommended level for the pending application after staff cuts
have been applied" - does that mean this pending one must be approved by the
council meeting to be included?
【在 l***s 的大作中提到】 : Yes, it is about Other Support. the previous NCE and this new application : should be considered as one. The total dollar amount of funded grants are : considered. Say, if you have two other active R01s (modular $250K), you are : okay to have a third one ($250K). But all grants would be counted including : other non-NIH grants.
| F***Q 发帖数: 6599 | 10 answer my own questions below.
renewed,
this is ok - A and A' 's budgets are not overlapping, so it won't exceeds
the limit.
't
cuts
the
no, the pending application D must be included in the JIT. It is only a
problem when this pending application (D) also receives a fundable score
around the same time when A' is being awarded. NIH's financial admin has
access to all NIH grant status data, they know when to raise that flag.
【在 F***Q 的大作中提到】 : : are : including : thanks, also thank for the link - I will run this with my pre-award admin : and give an estimate. : hypothetically - if one has 3 grants A, B and C, A is the one being renewed, : say the renewed grant is A'. A is currently in NCE, but with a non-zero : balance - assumed to be spent down before A' starts. : if A, B, C and A' are all modular, again, hypothetically speaking - does : this make it over 750k? or just within the limit?
| n******g 发帖数: 14 | 11 请问,NIGMS $750k的政策只是在新项目批准的时候适用,还是每年的年度进展报告的
时候都会审核?比如,我的NIH项目A,B,C刚批准的时候,都还在$750k以内。但是如
果第二年拿到一个新的NSF项目D,这样年度直接cost总数会超过$750k。在年度进展报
告的时候,A,B,C的钱会不会受到影响?
谢谢!
【在 F***Q 的大作中提到】 : answer my own questions below. : : renewed, : this is ok - A and A' 's budgets are not overlapping, so it won't exceeds : the limit. : 't : cuts : the : no, the pending application D must be included in the JIT. It is only a : problem when this pending application (D) also receives a fundable score
| F***Q 发帖数: 6599 | 12
I believe this will be re-evaluated every year when you submit your annual
report (which includes your most up to date Other Support)
【在 n******g 的大作中提到】 : 请问,NIGMS $750k的政策只是在新项目批准的时候适用,还是每年的年度进展报告的 : 时候都会审核?比如,我的NIH项目A,B,C刚批准的时候,都还在$750k以内。但是如 : 果第二年拿到一个新的NSF项目D,这样年度直接cost总数会超过$750k。在年度进展报 : 告的时候,A,B,C的钱会不会受到影响? : 谢谢!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|