|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x***h
发帖数: 9020 | 1 7.19 application recieved
7.26 追加 pp
7.29 delivered
7.30 clock start
8.2 check cashed，pp stoped by 0002
同一天还有一位1A同学rfe by 0002, 一位1b同学rfe by 0002,clock stopped 几乎同时
，不知道有没有在她手底下通过的那天
Claimed in the field of civil engineering, journal 7 (5 first),citation 59 没
区分他引自饮，这个被要求提交他引，自饮不到40。
老三项authorship,contribution and review
只有review met，另外两项要提供证据。其中best paper award 和 travel award被列
在第一项说不符合，尽管没有claim。AIAA membership被列在第二项，说不符合标准，
尽管也没claim。估计这个是RFE的最基本套路，如果整体不符合，每一项潜在的都被单
独列出。
review 符合标准，但是authorship和contribution不符合，具体如下，希望同学们踊跃
给出意见，最好rfe的同学可以给点idea，万分感谢。
(v) Evidence of the beneficiary's orginial scientifi,scholarly,artistic, ath
letic, or business-related contribution of major significance in the field.
The petitioner has provided:
Letters from peers and colleagues
Evidence of conference participation
This criterion has not been met becasuse the evidence submitted does not sho
w that the beneficiary's contribution are considered to be of major signific
ance int he field of endavor. To assist in determining whether the beneficia
ry's contribution are orignila and of major significance in the field, the p
etitioner may submit:
(vi) Evidence of the beneficiary's authorship of scholarly articles in the f
ield, in professional or major trade publication or other major media.
The petitioner has provided:
1. Publication and ciation records
please submit a complete record of the scholarly articles that beneficiary h
as authored. Evidence of this record could include
2. updated results from SciFinder or Google Scholar that show the beneficiar
y's citation record excluding by the beneficiary, the beneficiary's coauthor
s and the beneficiary's group members. | a********o
发帖数: 659 | 2 我觉得他就是直接套模板，我的跟你这个一字不差
同时
没
【在 x***h 的大作中提到】
: 7.19 application recieved
: 7.26 追加 pp
: 7.29 delivered
: 7.30 clock start
: 8.2 check cashed，pp stoped by 0002
: 同一天还有一位1A同学rfe by 0002, 一位1b同学rfe by 0002,clock stopped 几乎同时
: ，不知道有没有在她手底下通过的那天
: Claimed in the field of civil engineering, journal 7 (5 first),citation 59 没
: 区分他引自饮，这个被要求提交他引，自饮不到40。
: 老三项authorship,contribution and review
| x***h
发帖数: 9020 | 3 在看以前战友的帖子，基本都是这个套路
【在 a********o 的大作中提到】
: 我觉得他就是直接套模板，我的跟你这个一字不差
:
: 同时
: 没
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
