N****r
发帖数: 302 | 1 我们和一私立小学签了一年的合同（２０１１－２０１２），最近想退出，但私校坚持
要我们承担该学年学费（合同上是有这条）。
我们可争辩的有两条吧。
１） 合同中一contingency提到５月２７号， ２０１１之前要交＄１０００, 具体文
字如下：The school's acceptance of Student for enrollment is contingent upon
both Financially Responsible Parent(s)/Guardian(s) executing this Contract
and returning it to the School on or by May 27, 2011, along with the new
student deposit in the amount of $1000. 但我们是５月２７号签的合同，６月９号
才寄出check，他们６月14号ratify的。
２） 合同上有一取消日期，是５月３１号，但根据６月14才ratify的，该日期根本不
合理，使我们无法取消合同。
所以， 请教各位律达人，我们能根据此两项说合同无效吗？多谢。 |
z***e
发帖数: 1757 | 2 does not look like a winner for you. the school had the right to reject your
application but they did not exercise that right. The contract is still
valid.
upon
Contract
【在 N****r 的大作中提到】
: 我们和一私立小学签了一年的合同（２０１１－２０１２），最近想退出，但私校坚持
: 要我们承担该学年学费（合同上是有这条）。
: 我们可争辩的有两条吧。
: １） 合同中一contingency提到５月２７号， ２０１１之前要交＄１０００, 具体文
: 字如下：The school's acceptance of Student for enrollment is contingent upon
: both Financially Responsible Parent(s)/Guardian(s) executing this Contract
: and returning it to the School on or by May 27, 2011, along with the new
: student deposit in the amount of $1000. 但我们是５月２７号签的合同，６月９号
: 才寄出check，他们６月14号ratify的。
: ２） 合同上有一取消日期，是５月３１号，但根据６月14才ratify的，该日期根本不
|
N****r
发帖数: 302 | 3 thanks. it makes sense. so no way to argue?
your
【在 z***e 的大作中提到】
: does not look like a winner for you. the school had the right to reject your
: application but they did not exercise that right. The contract is still
: valid.
:
: upon
: Contract
|
z***e
发帖数: 1757 | 4 you need to post your contract language for anyone to opine on it.
【在 N****r 的大作中提到】
: thanks. it makes sense. so no way to argue?
:
: your
|
D***i
发帖数: 199 | 5 What they need to do is to find a REAL lawyer. 而不是拿这些只言片语来问一些
不见得有资格给法律意见的人.
【在 z***e 的大作中提到】
: you need to post your contract language for anyone to opine on it.
|
