N****r 发帖数: 302 | 1 我们和一私立小学签了一年的合同(2011-2012),最近想退出,但私校坚持
要我们承担该学年学费(合同上是有这条)。
我们可争辩的有两条吧。
1) 合同中一contingency提到5月27号, 2011之前要交$1000, 具体文
字如下:The school's acceptance of Student for enrollment is contingent upon
both Financially Responsible Parent(s)/Guardian(s) executing this Contract
and returning it to the School on or by May 27, 2011, along with the new
student deposit in the amount of $1000. 但我们是5月27号签的合同,6月9号
才寄出check,他们6月14号ratify的。
2) 合同上有一取消日期,是5月31号,但根据6月14才ratify的,该日期根本不
合理,使我们无法取消合同。
所以, 请教各位律达人,我们能根据此两项说合同无效吗?多谢。 |
z***e 发帖数: 1757 | 2 does not look like a winner for you. the school had the right to reject your
application but they did not exercise that right. The contract is still
valid.
upon
Contract
【在 N****r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 我们和一私立小学签了一年的合同(2011-2012),最近想退出,但私校坚持 : 要我们承担该学年学费(合同上是有这条)。 : 我们可争辩的有两条吧。 : 1) 合同中一contingency提到5月27号, 2011之前要交$1000, 具体文 : 字如下:The school's acceptance of Student for enrollment is contingent upon : both Financially Responsible Parent(s)/Guardian(s) executing this Contract : and returning it to the School on or by May 27, 2011, along with the new : student deposit in the amount of $1000. 但我们是5月27号签的合同,6月9号 : 才寄出check,他们6月14号ratify的。 : 2) 合同上有一取消日期,是5月31号,但根据6月14才ratify的,该日期根本不
|
N****r 发帖数: 302 | 3 thanks. it makes sense. so no way to argue?
your
【在 z***e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : does not look like a winner for you. the school had the right to reject your : application but they did not exercise that right. The contract is still : valid. : : upon : Contract
|
z***e 发帖数: 1757 | 4 you need to post your contract language for anyone to opine on it.
【在 N****r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : thanks. it makes sense. so no way to argue? : : your
|
D***i 发帖数: 199 | 5 What they need to do is to find a REAL lawyer. 而不是拿这些只言片语来问一些
不见得有资格给法律意见的人.
【在 z***e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : you need to post your contract language for anyone to opine on it.
|