|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a*******t
发帖数: 10093 | 1 除了美国宪法明文规定，“政教分离”、“不设国教”之外
美国钱币上的“in god we trust”，美国最高法院是有明确解释的
---------------------------------------------------------------------
“uch practices as the designation of "In God We Trust" as our national
motto, or the references to God contained in the Pledge of Allegiance to the
flag can best be understood, in Dean Rostow's apt phrase, as a form a "
ceremonial deism," [Footnote 2/24] protected from Establishment Clause
scrutiny chiefly because they have lost through rote repetition any
significant religious content.
大法官在这里建议，"In God We Trust"也好，效忠誓词里那个"在神之下"也好，都早
已在无数次机械性重复中失去了宗教内容。这些宗教性用语，最好理解成一种"礼仪性
质的自然神论"(ceremonial deism).
"礼仪性质的自然神论"这一说法，后来被欧康娜大法官在公立学校宣誓效忠案中继续引
用。” | a*******t
发帖数: 10093 | 2 也就是说，所谓的“in god we trust”中的god
不是耶和华，不是耶稣，不是真主安拉
而是中国几千年前就玩的“天父地母”
老天爷，土地奶
the
【在 a*******t 的大作中提到】
: 除了美国宪法明文规定，“政教分离”、“不设国教”之外
: 美国钱币上的“in god we trust”，美国最高法院是有明确解释的
: ---------------------------------------------------------------------
: “uch practices as the designation of "In God We Trust" as our national
: motto, or the references to God contained in the Pledge of Allegiance to the
: flag can best be understood, in Dean Rostow's apt phrase, as a form a "
: ceremonial deism," [Footnote 2/24] protected from Establishment Clause
: scrutiny chiefly because they have lost through rote repetition any
: significant religious content.
: 大法官在这里建议，"In God We Trust"也好，效忠誓词里那个"在神之下"也好，都早
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
