E*******e
发帖数: 1371 | 1 人家Anton Krupicka啥都不带，连衣服都不穿，渴了就喝山泉，car - summit - car
三个半小时，据说上下差不多7000尺、14mile，YDS5.5的难度。
其实，摄像的Kilian Jorent更牛一点点，据说丫自己用不到三个小时。 |
y*****y
发帖数: 3433 | |
d**p
发帖数: 1800 | |
E*******e
发帖数: 1371 | 4 说明你们爬山真是浪费时间！
【在 y*****y 的大作中提到】
: What's your point?
|
c*******r
发帖数: 13580 | 5 search "grand teton speed record"
【在 E*******e 的大作中提到】
: 人家Anton Krupicka啥都不带，连衣服都不穿，渴了就喝山泉，car - summit - car
: 三个半小时，据说上下差不多7000尺、14mile，YDS5.5的难度。
: 其实，摄像的Kilian Jorent更牛一点点，据说丫自己用不到三个小时。
|
e**o
发帖数: 5509 | 6 记得yosemite的El Capitan,也有这种速爬活动，
看过一个小电影，好像不到2小时，结论好像是和平地走直线差不多。
【在 c*******r 的大作中提到】
: search "grand teton speed record"
|
c*******r
发帖数: 13580 | 7 the speed record of the nose hasn't been broken under 2 hours yet. in fact,
far from that (2:23)
【在 e**o 的大作中提到】
: 记得yosemite的El Capitan,也有这种速爬活动，
: 看过一个小电影，好像不到2小时，结论好像是和平地走直线差不多。
|
l*******o
发帖数: 669 | 8 I will need at least 15 hours assuming simul-climbing all technical sections
. Laughably slow, I know, but that's just the reality.
From 100m to marathon in running, I am no more than 60% slower than world
record time. But when it comes climbing (Grand Teton or Rainier), I am 400%
slower. Indeed, very inefficient. |
c*******r
发帖数: 13580 | 9 400% slower isn't too bad for the nose
sections
%
【在 l*******o 的大作中提到】
: I will need at least 15 hours assuming simul-climbing all technical sections
: . Laughably slow, I know, but that's just the reality.
: From 100m to marathon in running, I am no more than 60% slower than world
: record time. But when it comes climbing (Grand Teton or Rainier), I am 400%
: slower. Indeed, very inefficient.
|
l*******o
发帖数: 669 | 10 Nose is different. That's very technical. Teton (5.5 route) is only
marginally technical. Most routes I climbed on Rainier are non-technical. (
People may disagree with me on the latter point, but to me if a route has no
technical section, it is not technical. Rescue may be technical, but
climbing isn't. Like rescue operation on class 3/4 terrain may be technical,
but class 3/4 terrain itself isn't.)
【在 c*******r 的大作中提到】
: 400% slower isn't too bad for the nose
:
: sections
: %
|
c*******r
发帖数: 13580 | 11 I consider Kautz technical, of course Liberty Ridge too. Furher Finger is
definitely not technical, nor is DC or Emmons.
no
technical,
【在 l*******o 的大作中提到】
: Nose is different. That's very technical. Teton (5.5 route) is only
: marginally technical. Most routes I climbed on Rainier are non-technical. (
: People may disagree with me on the latter point, but to me if a route has no
: technical section, it is not technical. Rescue may be technical, but
: climbing isn't. Like rescue operation on class 3/4 terrain may be technical,
: but class 3/4 terrain itself isn't.)
|
l*******o
发帖数: 669 | 12 When I climbed them, only Kautz glacier and LibRidge were technical, Sunset
ridge and Tahoma glacier is semi-technical. Others were not.
Note that technical climb does not mean it's harder/riskier than non-
technical climb. Kautz is definitely easier and safer than Success cleaver,
which was the scariest of all.
【在 c*******r 的大作中提到】
: I consider Kautz technical, of course Liberty Ridge too. Furher Finger is
: definitely not technical, nor is DC or Emmons.
:
: no
: technical,
|
c*******r
发帖数: 13580 | 13 agreed. roped mid class 5 climbing is way safer (if you protect well) and
less scary than scrambling class 4 loose shit.
Sunset
,
【在 l*******o 的大作中提到】
: When I climbed them, only Kautz glacier and LibRidge were technical, Sunset
: ridge and Tahoma glacier is semi-technical. Others were not.
: Note that technical climb does not mean it's harder/riskier than non-
: technical climb. Kautz is definitely easier and safer than Success cleaver,
: which was the scariest of all.
|
