E*******e 发帖数: 1371 | 1 人家Anton Krupicka啥都不带,连衣服都不穿,渴了就喝山泉,car - summit - car
三个半小时,据说上下差不多7000尺、14mile,YDS5.5的难度。
其实,摄像的Kilian Jorent更牛一点点,据说丫自己用不到三个小时。 |
y*****y 发帖数: 3433 | |
d**p 发帖数: 1800 | |
E*******e 发帖数: 1371 | 4 说明你们爬山真是浪费时间!
【在 y*****y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : What's your point?
|
c*******r 发帖数: 13580 | 5 search "grand teton speed record"
【在 E*******e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 人家Anton Krupicka啥都不带,连衣服都不穿,渴了就喝山泉,car - summit - car : 三个半小时,据说上下差不多7000尺、14mile,YDS5.5的难度。 : 其实,摄像的Kilian Jorent更牛一点点,据说丫自己用不到三个小时。
|
e**o 发帖数: 5509 | 6 记得yosemite的El Capitan,也有这种速爬活动,
看过一个小电影,好像不到2小时,结论好像是和平地走直线差不多。
【在 c*******r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : search "grand teton speed record"
|
c*******r 发帖数: 13580 | 7 the speed record of the nose hasn't been broken under 2 hours yet. in fact,
far from that (2:23)
【在 e**o 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 记得yosemite的El Capitan,也有这种速爬活动, : 看过一个小电影,好像不到2小时,结论好像是和平地走直线差不多。
|
l*******o 发帖数: 669 | 8 I will need at least 15 hours assuming simul-climbing all technical sections
. Laughably slow, I know, but that's just the reality.
From 100m to marathon in running, I am no more than 60% slower than world
record time. But when it comes climbing (Grand Teton or Rainier), I am 400%
slower. Indeed, very inefficient. |
c*******r 发帖数: 13580 | 9 400% slower isn't too bad for the nose
sections
%
【在 l*******o 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : I will need at least 15 hours assuming simul-climbing all technical sections : . Laughably slow, I know, but that's just the reality. : From 100m to marathon in running, I am no more than 60% slower than world : record time. But when it comes climbing (Grand Teton or Rainier), I am 400% : slower. Indeed, very inefficient.
|
l*******o 发帖数: 669 | 10 Nose is different. That's very technical. Teton (5.5 route) is only
marginally technical. Most routes I climbed on Rainier are non-technical. (
People may disagree with me on the latter point, but to me if a route has no
technical section, it is not technical. Rescue may be technical, but
climbing isn't. Like rescue operation on class 3/4 terrain may be technical,
but class 3/4 terrain itself isn't.)
【在 c*******r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 400% slower isn't too bad for the nose : : sections : %
|
c*******r 发帖数: 13580 | 11 I consider Kautz technical, of course Liberty Ridge too. Furher Finger is
definitely not technical, nor is DC or Emmons.
no
technical,
【在 l*******o 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : Nose is different. That's very technical. Teton (5.5 route) is only : marginally technical. Most routes I climbed on Rainier are non-technical. ( : People may disagree with me on the latter point, but to me if a route has no : technical section, it is not technical. Rescue may be technical, but : climbing isn't. Like rescue operation on class 3/4 terrain may be technical, : but class 3/4 terrain itself isn't.)
|
l*******o 发帖数: 669 | 12 When I climbed them, only Kautz glacier and LibRidge were technical, Sunset
ridge and Tahoma glacier is semi-technical. Others were not.
Note that technical climb does not mean it's harder/riskier than non-
technical climb. Kautz is definitely easier and safer than Success cleaver,
which was the scariest of all.
【在 c*******r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : I consider Kautz technical, of course Liberty Ridge too. Furher Finger is : definitely not technical, nor is DC or Emmons. : : no : technical,
|
c*******r 发帖数: 13580 | 13 agreed. roped mid class 5 climbing is way safer (if you protect well) and
less scary than scrambling class 4 loose shit.
Sunset
,
【在 l*******o 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : When I climbed them, only Kautz glacier and LibRidge were technical, Sunset : ridge and Tahoma glacier is semi-technical. Others were not. : Note that technical climb does not mean it's harder/riskier than non- : technical climb. Kautz is definitely easier and safer than Success cleaver, : which was the scariest of all.
|