y***i
发帖数: 11639 | 1 This article has drawn an extraordinary level of outraged response. The
volume of comments has been so great that our online commenting system is
unable to cope: it deletes earlier posts as new ones arrive. We much regret
this ongoing problem. The disappearance of some cogent responses to the
story has fuelled suspicions that Nature is deliberately censoring the
strongest criticisms. This is absolutely not the case: Nature welcomes
critically minded discussion of our content. (We intentionally removed only
a few comments that violated our Community Guidelines by being abusive or
defamatory, including several that offensively stereotyped the many Chinese
readers who commented on the story.)
Many of the commenters have questioned why we changed the original subtitle
of the story from “‘Performance profiling’ could help catch sports cheats
” to “‘Performance profiling’ could help dispel doubts”. The original
version of the title was unfair to the swimmer Ye Shiwen and did not reflect
the substance of the story. We regret that the original appeared in the
first place. We also regret that the original story included an error about
the improvement in Ye’s time for the 400-metre individual medley: she
improved by 7 seconds since July 2011, not July 2012. We have corrected the
error.
We apologize to our readers for these errors, and for the unintended removal
of comments because of technical issues with our commenting system. Below
we reproduce one of the most thorough and thoughtful of the hundreds of
responses we received. Beneath it, we continue with our response. |
y***i
发帖数: 11639 | 2 另外，Nature发的那位读者来信，是一位发了PRL的中国学生。向这位能挺身而出，愿
为天下先的同学致敬！
regret
only
Chinese
【在 y***i 的大作中提到】
: This article has drawn an extraordinary level of outraged response. The
: volume of comments has been so great that our online commenting system is
: unable to cope: it deletes earlier posts as new ones arrive. We much regret
: this ongoing problem. The disappearance of some cogent responses to the
: story has fuelled suspicions that Nature is deliberately censoring the
: strongest criticisms. This is absolutely not the case: Nature welcomes
: critically minded discussion of our content. (We intentionally removed only
: a few comments that violated our Community Guidelines by being abusive or
: defamatory, including several that offensively stereotyped the many Chinese
: readers who commented on the story.)
|
N***m
发帖数: 4460 | 3 nature不过是耍了个小手段而已。
要是叶真的被查出，证明nature很牛啊；
要是查处没有，道个歉，树立个知错就该的好形象，也是加分阿。
regret
only
Chinese
【在 y***i 的大作中提到】
: This article has drawn an extraordinary level of outraged response. The
: volume of comments has been so great that our online commenting system is
: unable to cope: it deletes earlier posts as new ones arrive. We much regret
: this ongoing problem. The disappearance of some cogent responses to the
: story has fuelled suspicions that Nature is deliberately censoring the
: strongest criticisms. This is absolutely not the case: Nature welcomes
: critically minded discussion of our content. (We intentionally removed only
: a few comments that violated our Community Guidelines by being abusive or
: defamatory, including several that offensively stereotyped the many Chinese
: readers who commented on the story.)
|
w*********o
发帖数: 434 | 4 没有看出道歉的意味来，就是说了因为技术原因comment board关闭道歉，这个和原来
文章的事情没有什么大的关联。而后面说的也就为了数据有误道歉，也没有说他们的结
论是错误的。
我觉得如果Nature真的真诚的道歉，就应该把那片文章撤掉，不然都是玩虚的。 |
