f******g
发帖数: 13917 | 1 其实明年温网结束时就有一个澳网的大分数要保，
其他的都是小case？
Nadal有3000分的大师赛，和2个GS.
明年如果稍有闪失，那现在的3000分的差距就化为乌有了。
大家说说看 |
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 2 Federer can be No.1 if from 1/1/2011 till end of Wimbledon 2011,
Federer's total points gained during that period is no less than
1310 points below Nadal's total points.
【在 f******g 的大作中提到】
: 其实明年温网结束时就有一个澳网的大分数要保，
: 其他的都是小case？
: Nadal有3000分的大师赛，和2个GS.
: 明年如果稍有闪失，那现在的3000分的差距就化为乌有了。
: 大家说说看
|
s***i
发帖数: 6149 | 3 澳网打完再说吧，如果把纳达尔和FF澳网的成绩掉个个，那不就是近5000分的差距了么
？丢它三个大师赛又如何？更何况那是红土，除非是重大伤病，就是想稍有闪失都难 |
d****t
发帖数: 1284 | 4 如果nadal能拿下明年的australian open，那就是个跨年的grand slam(4 in a roll)
了。这
个在公开赛时代好像男子里还没有人做到过吧。
如果nadal下两个月调整好的话ausie夺冠的机会并不小。
【在 s***i 的大作中提到】
: 澳网打完再说吧，如果把纳达尔和FF澳网的成绩掉个个，那不就是近5000分的差距了么
: ？丢它三个大师赛又如何？更何况那是红土，除非是重大伤病，就是想稍有闪失都难
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 5 Rod Laver (1969). It was even in the same calender year.
【在 d****t 的大作中提到】
: 如果nadal能拿下明年的australian open，那就是个跨年的grand slam(4 in a roll)
: 了。这
: 个在公开赛时代好像男子里还没有人做到过吧。
: 如果nadal下两个月调整好的话ausie夺冠的机会并不小。
|
s****y
发帖数: 704 | 6 for Laver, at that time, three slams were on grass.
【在 K****D 的大作中提到】
: Rod Laver (1969). It was even in the same calender year.
|
K****D
发帖数: 30533 | 7 Had AO or USO been held on hard courts, it wouldn't be reasonable to
assume it would be much harder for him to win, since hard court was
his 2nd best surface (81.3% career winning ratio) and he played most
of his matches on either hard courts or carpets.
http://www.atpworldtour.com/Tennis/Players/La/R/Rod-G-Laver.aspx?t=mr
(Note these are open era numbers that only include his career after
1968 when he was already 30.)
【在 s****y 的大作中提到】
: for Laver, at that time, three slams were on grass.
|
