W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 1 never read any book systematically. I was reading the pdf version of Non-
limit holdem--theory and practice by Ed Miller and David Skalansky just now
(first one ever for me). after the first 20-30 pages, so far nothing that I
don't already know. The funny part is that one example they used on implied
odds is almost exactly the same i used earlier today that I posted on 智游
城。。 ^_^
可能我比我想象得还要厉害一点点。。。。lol
EDIT: 后来又想了想，不是我厉害。 是poker 里很多东西太obvious了。 打一阵子，自己都可以悟出来的。。。 | W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 2 "But poker is a strange bird. If, somehow, you were blessed tomorrow with
the
knowledge of the perfect strategy (and stripped of all other poker knowledge
),
then you’d do quite well. Playing your perfect strategy, you’d be
guaranteed
not to be a long-term loser, and, in today’s games with plenty of bad
players,
you’d likely win a mint.
But you wouldn’t be the best player. At least you wouldn’t be if you
defined
“best player” as the one with the highest average win rate in three- or
morehanded
g | W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 3 "Concept No. 20: Sometimes you should limp behind limpers with
pocket aces. In limit hold ’em, you’d never want to limp behind other
limpers
holding pocket aces, but in no limit (with deep stacks) it can sometimes be
a good play. You’d do this if you have opponents yet to act who like to raise
a series of limpers with weak hands.
“Deep limping” with aces balances your play and traps overzealous preflop
stealers. You can reraise the raise (even better if someone calls the raise
before
you act), a | W********h
发帖数: 274 | 4 我觉得perfect的game意思就包括在适当的时候打得edgy一点。看碟下菜。
这点都做不到，称不上perfect。你说呢？ |
|
