|
s*******o
发帖数: 4896 | 2 个人观点PLO这样call两枪必然是有K啦，因为小full house的可能性很小，除非刚好跟
turn
弄上FH
我觉得wrap不太会call flop
river吧我也不知道怎么打，很难讲对方有没有A，理论上讲这里有A的可能性很高啊，
因为AK是连起来的牌
out,
bet |
|
c******q
发帖数: 456 | 3 Don't know much of PLO, just try to keep the ball rolling.
We can somehow ignore AK. Either you bet or you c/c, the result is the same.
Unless villian is a neat player who will never bet here with hand worse
than hero's.
Should we check or bet, I think it depends on how often the villian will
call your bet with KQ/KJ type of hands vs. how often he will bet with the
same type of hand if you check. If (1) is more likely than (2), betting is
certainly more profitable.
In general, I'd like to bet ha... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*********k
发帖数: 1989 | 4 plo is messy. Any possiblity goes up 6X. Better not go nuts without
nuts and until river
Remember once, I won an 215 SCOOP thru satellite. I flop nut straight and
check raise and allin after re-raise. The guy had
set on flop and reach boat on turn. As that says, even you had the
nuts, you cannot go nuts until river. Anytime you allin before river, there
is either 35% or 18% you got beaten on river.
Overall that is worse than allin on flop w/ TPTK and get called by middle pair
at NLHE. You do not... 阅读全帖 |
|
h**n
发帖数: 981 | 5 so seems the strategy for plo is just to sitout |
|
l*****g
发帖数: 1128 | 6 非常感谢!很好的tips. 俺老是分不清preflop什么是好牌什么是烂牌,又总是拿两对当
大牌来打,每次都早早踢出局了.现在经你这么一分析和讲解,我算对plo有点了解了,再
次感谢.
,
A98
牌r
we
se
chec |
|
f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | 7 哥，您老也炸出来了，哈哈，good job!
期待后续！
PLO是俺的强项，版上人都知道，有问题随便问。
500 |
|
f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | 8 he looks like very careful and experienced.
too many ppl play PLO in NLHM way.
intimidation
high
draw |
|
f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | 9 PLO water is deep, the game of nuts.
i need a strong heart to play it, haha.
callers.
few
good |
|
I**n
发帖数: 839 | 10 6) Game flow. As I first sat down I am like a 羞涩的少女. Slowly I flow into
the game. I could feel when 白站长 lost a pot and ready to repot preflop so
I tossed my speculative hands which I normally play. The game kept changing
dynamics but overall I managed to play accordingly. I did loose up a little
and played a few marginal hands from bad positions but stopped the bleeding
in time.
7) Normally I would play to table break. This is the fist time I set the 2
hours timer before sitting down. I ends up ... 阅读全帖 |
|
T********n
发帖数: 528 | 11 Sounds like a fun game! Most live PLO games around my area is pretty passive
pre flop and most people just waiting for the nuts, instead of jamming
equity >.< |
|
c***f
发帖数: 52 | 12 Hero has 180. UTG has 300. CO has 140
Cash game 1/2.
straggle 5
Hero with KdJh9s9c called.
7 player in the hand pot unraised. Pot 35
Flop: QhTd5h
UTG: bet 35.
Hero called.
CO called as well. So 3 players left.
So up to now I think my play is correct.
Turn: Ad. Hero made the straight.
UTG check.
Hero bet allin. Is this a correct move????
CO called. UTG called.
Now we are discussing how many times we run.
Up to now. Hero realize both of those players are on a draw. Either a heart
or diamond draw.
... 阅读全帖 |
|
a******y
发帖数: 112 | 13 1. Fold pre is much better. KJ99R is a pretty bad hand, especially multiway.
When play such short stack PLO, you better off only open with premium hands
and commit.
2. Ok flop for you, but you get crushed by any broadway wrap, any combo draw
with a flush draw. ( Again that is why you should fold a bad hand pre). If
you decided to continue on the flop, just repot get-in hoping to push other
drawing hands out, for such stack no much you can do other than fold or
shove on such wet board.
3. Run onc... 阅读全帖 |
|
j********z
发帖数: 3242 | 14 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
CharlesUILGu (Charles UILGuy) 于 (Fri Jul 18 03:34:48 2008) 提到:
近日，美国加州和挪威相继宣布同性婚姻合法，而科学家对同性恋的研究也取得了重要
进展。研究表明，同性恋至少部分是遗传的。虽然同性恋者生育的孩子数要远少于异性
恋者，但事实表明，所谓的“同性恋基因”（gay genes）能在人群中幸存下去。新研
究对此提出了一个令人感兴趣的观点——这些基因能够增加女性的生育力。研究论文6
月18日发表在《公共科学图书馆•综合》（PLoS ONE）上。
虽然科学家至今尚未分离出任何与同性恋直接相关的基因，但是许多研究表明，男同性
恋在他们的母系要比在父系拥有更多的男同性恋亲属。这使一些科学家猜测，同性恋基
因有可能存在于X染色体上。
2004年，意大利帕多瓦大学进化心理学家Andrea Camperio Ciani领导的研究小组报告
，和与异性恋男人有亲戚关系的女人相比，与同性恋男人有亲戚关系的女人生育了更多
的孩子。差别相当惊人—— |
|
t*********2
发帖数: 3 | 15 现在有一篇文章准备中，在这个两个杂志间犹豫。IF差不多，PNAS好像名声越来越不好
，Plos又比较新，是open access.但国内的人好像对PNAS更看重。我以后是想回国内混
得.有没有有经验的人给点建议阿？万分感谢！ |
|
p*******r
发帖数: 4048 | 16 If you want to go back to China, definitely PNAS.
PNAS is almost a nature paper in China. PLos paper = nothing in China. |
|
g**********t
发帖数: 475 | 17 其实我也认为PNAS和Plos biology是一个档次。PNAS烂文章有，但是好文章也很多。 |
|
p*******r
发帖数: 4048 | 18 Are there also academian's club journals in China?
(track
A
contributed
complaint too
don't
PLoS
won't |
|
n********k
发帖数: 2818 | 19 do u want to star Chinese version of plos one..., I would help:))) |
|
S**********l
发帖数: 3835 | 20 今天收到一个plos one的review invitation.听说这杂志不要真的review的?如果是这
样.我就直接接受了.多谢指导先! |
|
|
m*******y
发帖数: 268 | 22 这都是从哪说起啊，当然要review了，ft，什么叫technologically sound? 我们实验
室一片投Molecular cell没成以后投plos one，回来的review有一个几乎差不多。你如
果想ruin your reputation to the editor，就不用take it seriously. |
|
|
l**********n
发帖数: 240 | 24 我目前实验室的一个师兄， 已经毕业2年了。有一片文章，数据很solid， 但大部分是
阴性结果。
试遍了本领域的主流杂志， 都被据了。去年年底发在了PLOS one.
不过听说编辑和审稿人还是挺严的。 |
|
M*****n
发帖数: 16729 | 25 Do you imply that Plos ONE is like a dumpster? |
|
l**********n
发帖数: 240 | 26 没有任何“imply”， 我只是在说事实。
不过如果是阳性结果，我们老板一般不会投低于JBC的杂志。
好像在他看来Plos ONE 还不算差，要不然也看不上眼。 |
|
S****r
发帖数: 982 | 27 应该说一开始PLOS one还是不错。 但现在每年4000多article，接受率70%，基本算是
交钱就能出版的网上杂志，很快会成为BBRC，FEBS letters这一档次杂志被据后的垃圾
筒。 |
|
a****o
发帖数: 1786 | 28 去年有段时间
Nature, Science经常highlight PLoS One上的文章，包括著名的蝙蝠 |
|
g**********t
发帖数: 475 | 29 Plos computational biology 是好杂志。 |
|
|
m******o
发帖数: 571 | 31 PLoS ONE's impact factor has been discussed for a while, now it finally came
out.
4.351 is not too bad. |
|
n***w
发帖数: 2405 | 32 the video is so funny.
but I don't think plos one is that bad... |
|
C*******e
发帖数: 4348 | 33 你这样说让那些版上有PLoS One的同学们情何以堪啊
much
money as they can 还有一个 |
|
b*****l
发帖数: 9499 | 34 看好 plos 系列啊，上升期。nature 子刊系列已经红过了，IF 增长速度已经放缓。
much money as they can 还有一个 |
|
O******e
发帖数: 4845 | 35 PLoS One的接受率大概是70%，有正规和严格的审稿程序。 |
|
m********a
发帖数: 12601 | 36 PLOS不是不要钱么？
莫非是只收投稿人的钱？
much money as they can 还有一个 |
|
N**R
发帖数: 16 | 37 想投一篇PLoS ONE文章，不知道是否会给牛人鄙视？ |
|
N**R
发帖数: 16 | 38 据说CNS 60% 的文章主要结论不能被重复。PLoS ONE 50% 的不能重复。到底那个好？ |
|
N**R
发帖数: 16 | 39 CNS 的来自于一次讲座，是一个药厂的研发头目根据他们自己的经验总结。PLoS One
来自于他们editor 收到的读者反馈，详情他们以后会发表。 |
|
P****d
发帖数: 564 | 40 Cool. Look forward to the report by PLoS One. Should be very interesting
to read! |
|
A*****n
发帖数: 243 | 41 plos
果再多一篇PNAS，简历上是不是不好看？谢谢！ |
|
s******y
发帖数: 28562 | 42 如果你们这么有信心那就投PLoS Biology
果再多一篇PNAS，简历上是不是不好看？谢谢！ |
|
l****y
发帖数: 398 | 43 plos.
but why not try nature or cell sisters, even CNS.
direct submission)，如果再多一篇
PNAS，简历上是不是不好看？谢谢！ |
|
a*******z
发帖数: 65 | 44 Dev Cell vs Plos Biology,
which one has higher reputation ?
which one is easier to accept a manuscript ? |
|
w********r
发帖数: 1431 | 45 Dev Cell吧。
个人感觉Plos Biology是PNAS，Blood这一档的 |
|
a*******z
发帖数: 65 | 46 Plos biolgy 去年的impact factor是13. 五年的impact factor 都14.5了.
尽管是open access journal, 好像也狠好啊. pnas, blood 好像没到那个level |
|
s******y
发帖数: 28562 | 47 两个都很难。但是dev cell上经常有投了cell被拒后转到那边去的文章。
总体而言，Plos Bio声誉更高一些。 |
|
s**e
发帖数: 1523 | 48 在developmental biology方向DC应该是排第一的。感觉Plos Biology和DC的侧重点不
同啊？ |
|
l**********n
发帖数: 201 | 49 PLoS Biol 自己的标准是 CNS 级的，虽然很多时候也是 CNS 不中的文章转投过来。
Dev Cell 投稿也可以同时再投一个 Mol Cell 之类的 cell sister journal，也许中
奖率会高一点？至少他们的 policy 是允许怎么做的，不算 misconducts. |
|
f***4
发帖数: 886 | 50 Dev Cell 在领域内的地位比Plos Biology高多了吧。不过比较难接受，是月刊 |
|
