|
j******n 发帖数: 1727 | 2 【 以下文字转载自 Chemistry 讨论区 】
发信人: judiefan (Judiefan), 信区: Chemistry
标 题: 求paper, 内附链接, 谢谢
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Oct 30 17:48:13 2011, 美东)
求哪位大虾帮我下一下这个文章的全文,谢谢啦!!
www.sciencemag.org/content/early/2011/10/26/science.1212858
请email我:j**********[email protected] |
|
|
|
|
f*******h 发帖数: 1269 | 6 好消息啊! cut is restored.
http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2013/07/senate-spendi
A Senate spending panel today approved a bill giving the National Institutes
of Health (NIH) $31 billion in 2014, a figure that would restore this year'
s painful 5% cut from sequestration and give the agency a small increase
over its 2012 budget.
The mandatory across-the-board federal cuts known as sequestration slashed $
1.55 billion from NIH's budget this year and will result in belt-tightening
at labs with... 阅读全帖 |
|
j******n 发帖数: 1727 | 7 http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2013/07/senate-panel-
Senate appropriators yesterday expressed their satisfaction with the status
quo at the National Science Foundation (NSF).
In a bipartisan vote, the Senate Appropriations Committee endorsed a 7.9%
increase for the agency that would boost its 2014 budget to $7.426 billion.
In doing so, it also questioned the value of various initiatives launched by
its former director as well as the wisdom of assigning new responsibilities
to NSF's ed... 阅读全帖 |
|
P*****t 发帖数: 4978 | 8 China's Publication Bazaar
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6162/1035.full
A Science investigation has uncovered a smorgasbord of questionable
practices including paying for author's slots on papers written by other
scientists and buying papers from online brokers.
SHANGHAI, CHINA—The e-mail arrived around noon from the mysterious sender "
Publish SCI Paper," with the subject line "Transfer co-first author and co-
corresponding author." A message body uncluttered with pleasantries
contained... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
M****o 发帖数: 4860 | 10 ◇◇新语丝(www.xys.org)(xys7.dxiong.com)(xys.ebookdiy.com)(xys2.dropin.org)
◇◇
大连化学物理研究所一篇论文四个通讯作者
最新一期的Science杂志刊登了由大连化学物理研究所人员撰写的一篇论文,
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/342/6165/1499
虽然参与人员都来自同一个研究组,通讯作者竟然有4人之多。同一个研究
组,有必要设立4个通讯作者吗?
联合通讯作者本来就是中国人的发明,国外科学界对此颇有微词。现在在同
一个研究组里居然都出现这种情况,而且数量众多。这明显是投机取巧,滥用通
讯作者的身份。此举助长了不良学术风气,有辱国格,负面示范作用非常坏!望
严肃处理,还科学界一个干净、淡泊的环境。
(XYS20131227)
◇◇新语丝(www.xys.org)(xys7.dxiong.com)(xys.ebookdiy.com)(xys2.dropin.org)
◇◇ |
|
|
|
M****o 发帖数: 4860 | 13 【 以下文字转载自 Biology 讨论区 】
发信人: whiteorblack (黑白颠倒), 信区: Biology
标 题: 一个弯弯自撸撸出了60多篇paper, 太葱白了!
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Mon Jul 14 10:33:00 2014, 美东)
这逼伪造了100多了虚拟的reviewer和gmail账户,submit paper时直接recommend这些
虚拟人物进行评审,自己给自己审稿,发了60多篇文章。
考!!!!!!!!!!!早知道这也行,我也著作等身了,早就泡到小保方晴子了。
http://news.sciencemag.org/people-events/2014/07/lax-reviewing- |
|
|
|
C****u 发帖数: 1464 | 16 我一直觉得国内的学术自由应该是在进步而不是退步。最近方舟子因为批评周小平的文
章《“网络作家”梦游美利坚》而博客账号被封锁,这实在让我觉得很惊讶。今天又看
到Science关于一个千人计划的负面消息(http://www.sciencemag.org/content/346/6208/411.full)。总体让人感觉因为政治等因素中国科学软实力要真正进步实在艰难。
想起张益唐的采访,“他们着急。希望中国的科学,软实力能上去,就像体育金牌一样
,这样来显示中国的软实力并不差。” 这实在滑稽--没放开学术自由,真的可以有真
正的科学进步?现在中国领导人难道不懂? |
|
|
I****p 发帖数: 101 | 18 交钱加快评审,很有趣的尝试,很多时候影响因子5分以下的杂志很难找到reviewer的
,谁有时间去审?有时发生3-4个月都没有审完的情况。
这个英国家伙有点做作了,说不定他自己就是那种收到manuscript就放一个月不管,之
后就拖到最后、在催促几次后赶紧花1-2个小时上交评审的主。(当然很多人都这么干
,除非是熟人的或非常非常有意思的东西)
http://news.sciencemag.org/scientific-community/2015/03/editor-
听说Lancet就付100刀,要求几天之内审完,最快回复评审意见的可以拿钱。有人说每
个人评审一篇的时间都是固定的,但是有时100刀,扣完税后给小孩玩一下游乐场也不
错。这样双赢!?有钱的主的确不在乎这点破钱,但是大多数理工的新AP还是更愿意评
审这种东西的。
突然发现,这个是我们文化的一部分,国内审一篇稿或基金都有钱,而在美国的作为外
专审自然基金重点项目(至少几份)一分报酬都没有,真是入乡随俗啊。 |
|
|
l****y 发帖数: 486 | 20 House committee approves bill on speeding medical innovation
http://news.sciencemag.org/funding/2015/05/house-committee-appr
Jocelyn is a staff writer for Science magazine.
Email Jocelyn
By Jocelyn Kaiser 21 May 2015 5:30 pm 0 Comments
A major congressional effort to spur medical innovation passed another
milestone today when a House of Representatives committee signed off on the
21st Century Cures Act.
The bill, developed by representatives Fred Upton (R–MI) and Diana DeGette
(D–CO), revamps po... 阅读全帖 |
|
b*****d 发帖数: 61690 | 21 【 以下文字转载自 Biology 讨论区 】
发信人: zhiduoduo (Transform), 信区: Biology
标 题: Senate panel approves $2 billion raise for NIH in 2016
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Jun 26 11:10:17 2015, 美东)
这点钱还不够美军造艘船的成本,虽然不多,也比没有好点。
By Jocelyn Kaiser 23 June 2015 5:15 pm 2 Comments
At last, biomedical researchers may be getting some relief. A Senate panel
today approved a bill that would bestow a generous $2 billion increase on
the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in 2016, or what appears to be a 6%
raise, to $32 billion. Alt... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
|
|
s******y 发帖数: 28562 | 25 http://science.sciencemag.org/content/351/6280/1405.1.full
昨天刚刚在Science 登出来的内容,NIH 的领导以及各机构director 合写了一篇文章
,声明NIH一向支持基础研究从来没有变改过,并把CRISPR 技术的进展作为一个基础研
究成功的例子。说他们注意到了很多所里的基础研究项目明显的减少了。但是他们坚持
说这些减少是因为往那些所投的基础研究项目变少了。他们为了鼓励纯基础研究,准备
简化一些文档,不再强迫研究者们写他们的研究到底和public health 有什么直接关系
。
但是他们没有明说的一点是,投入基础研究的资金会不会改变。
以下是全文:
Basic science: Bedrock of progress
Almost 4 years ago, one of us (F.S.C.) wrote an Editorial (1) affirming the
continued importance of basic research to the National Institutes of Health... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
|
b*****d 发帖数: 61690 | 28 http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/8/331/331ed3
Funding unfunded NIH research applications
The Biomedical Research Funding Enterprise Provides The Infrastructure that
leads to new medical products that impact global health. Throughout history,
the long and successful tradition in the United States of investing in
biomedical research involves funding support by government, nonprofit
biomedical foundations, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, and
other private funds. However, even with the ... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
c**x 发帖数: 120 | 30 http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2016/08/nih-sets-new-postdoc-stipend-levels
In response to a new rule governing overtime pay in the United States, the
National Institutes of Health yesterday announced its new, increased postdoc
stipend levels, which will go into effect 1 December 2016. The starting
base salary will be $47,484, up approximately 9% from the 2016 level of $43,
692 and just above the threshold of $47,476, below which employers are
required to pay employees for overtime. The new ra... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
|
n**e 发帖数: 1296 | 33 是生活大爆炸,还是纸牌屋?
在很多人的脑海中,科学家的形象就是这样:不擅社交,不修边幅。他们更关心自然规
律,而不在意诸如社会地位之类的世俗问题。可事实远非如此,甚至有瑞士学者提出,
科学和科学家们,正日渐沦为自恋危机的牺牲品。
自恋的影响瑞士洛桑联邦理工学院的免疫学家Bruno Lemaitre表示,现在做科研已经不
像从前了:仅仅做到正确,甚至是拿到个第一,都已经是不够的了。要想爬到科研金字
塔的顶端,必须要依靠光辉的媒体形象,需要在“顶级期刊”上发表文章,需要在学术
圈经营那亦敌亦友的关系网。他们今天可能还是你亲密的盟友,但明天也许就会转变成
你学术之路上的障碍。
Lemaitre在最近一次讲话上这样描述:世界顶级实验室和国际会议上的残酷气氛,与其
说更贴近《生活大爆炸》,不如说更像是《纸牌屋》。
“很多伟大的科学家都是自恋狂。这说来有点难过,不过这是事实。”他讲道,“这可
能会让旁人感到惊讶,因为科学家通常被认为是谦逊的真理探索者,会共同协作来实现
科学的进步。”在个人主义方面,科学家的表现并不是特别的。实际上政治、影视或者
时尚界可能更为严重,而且这是全球性的趋势。但不可否认... 阅读全帖 |
|
H****N 发帖数: 997 | 34 http://science.sciencemag.org/content/355/6329/1022
Summary
Universalism—the evaluation of scientists' achievements based on merit
alone rather than on functionally irrelevant factors (1–3)—has long been
an unquestioned norm in science. Its existence is best illustrated by the
reactions of outrage whenever a violation of universalism in science is
exposed. For example, a study by Moss-Racusin et al. received a lot of
attention in the scientific community because it found that when assessing
appl... 阅读全帖 |
|
H****N 发帖数: 997 | 35 http://science.sciencemag.org/content/355/6329/1022
Summary
Universalism—the evaluation of scientists' achievements based on merit
alone rather than on functionally irrelevant factors (1–3)—has long been
an unquestioned norm in science. Its existence is best illustrated by the
reactions of outrage whenever a violation of universalism in science is
exposed. For example, a study by Moss-Racusin et al. received a lot of
attention in the scientific community because it found that when assessing
appl... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
|
|
d***a 发帖数: 13752 | 39 那个是joke,但严格来说也不是,因为这次他还是拿到了180亿美元的军费增长(不到
半年的时间),可以满足了。漫天要价,就地还钱,这是The art of the deal的精髓。
真正的重点是18年预算。Trump要540亿美元的军费增长,18%的NIH砍幅。也许最后他只
能拿到360亿的增长,12%的砍幅,这对他这说也够了。
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/03/nih-doe-office-science-face-deep-cuts-trumps-first-budget
President Donald Trump's first budget request to Congress, to be released at
7 a.m. Thursday, will call for cutting the 2018 budget of the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) by $6 billion, or nearly 20%, according to
sources familiar wi... 阅读全帖 |
|
s********n 发帖数: 4346 | 40 http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/05/how-science-fares-us-budget-deal
Not super good news for NSF:
NSF ordered to build three ships
Congress has told the National Science Foundation (NSF) to build three
research ships—but hasn’t given it enough to money to pay for them all.
The 2017 spending bill basically holds NSF’s funding steady—a $9 million
bump to $7.472 billion. It keeps both the six research directorates and NSF
’s education directorate at their combined 2016 totals, of $6.033 billion
... 阅读全帖 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
发帖数: 1 | 46 华人学者李晓江被控欺诈案下月召开听证会,去年遭解雇
作者 | 冯丽妃
自去年5月起,美籍华人科学家李晓江和李世华夫妇遭美国埃默里大学解雇一事,引发
学术界广泛关注。
据《科学》网站消息,当地时间2月4日,美国全国广播公司(NBC)首次报道了关于李
晓江的最新动态:
他于去年11月21日被指控欺骗美国政府,理由是他在从一家中国机构获得薪水的同时,
还从美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)获得研究经费。
NBC报道称,李晓江已于去年11月缴纳保释金,并表示有关此案的听证会将于下月举行。
李晓江是著名生物学家,研究领域为遗传性神经疾病的模式与机理。他和妻子李世华在
埃默里大学医学院工作了23年。
2018年11月,NIH向若干美国科研机构发信,要求对近200名学术研究人员进行调查。这
些人被认为违反了要求披露其所有研究经费来源的政策。
要求埃默里大学调查李晓江夫妇的行为,是NIH此次举动的一部分。
去年5月,李晓江夫妇因未能“充分公开……在中国的工作范围”而被埃默里大学解雇
,实验室也突遭关闭。
“我很震惊,埃默里大学竟然以如此非同寻常和迅速的方式解雇一名终身教授,并且关
闭了包括许多研究生和博士后... 阅读全帖 |
|
b**u 发帖数: 2761 | 47 刚才闲来无事,翻了一堆旧杂志在看,在science 06年11月的一期上看到这篇文章,推荐
到food版也算是对food名人介绍吧。
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/314/5803/1235
HERVÉ THIS PROFILE:
The Joy of Evidence-Based Cooking
Martin Enserink
Molecular gastronomist Hervé This is trying to demystify cooking in a
country whose cuisine is famous worldwide
PARIS--Is it true that pears turn red in covered copper pans lined
with tin? Do you always have to whip cream in the same direction? Does
the skin of suckling pigs really get more crackling |
|
|
s******s 发帖数: 13035 | 49 【 以下文字转载自 Biology 讨论区 】
发信人: shakuras (doskey), 信区: Biology
标 题: 我早就看天天宣传抗氧化物包治百病的不爽了,终于。。。
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Oct 24 11:30:36 2015, 美东)
抗氧化物促销就是一个骗局,某某水果/蔬菜某种抗氧化物比较多,就贵两美金,
甚至制成保健品糊弄人,请问这里面的抗氧化加起来,有两分钱成本的维生素C片
的十分之一多么?
我不是说抗氧化物没有生物学作用,相反,这玩意儿确实有用,不过有用不一定有
好处。最简单的说,这些玩意儿虽然对保护健康细胞可能有点好处,不过抗癌药物很多
依赖杀死癌细胞的作用可能被抗氧化物抵消,造成失去作用。
不过,我还是没想到这篇文章的出炉,说明抗氧化物可能促进癌细胞生长。 在Sci
Trans Med可是IF16的顶级杂志之一,不是那些发表反转基因的欧洲三流杂志。
Antioxidants can increase melanoma metastasis in mice。
http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/7/30... 阅读全帖 |
|
x*d 发帖数: 24 | 50 【 以下文字转载自 Overseas 讨论区,原文如下 】
发信人: xdd (布), 信区: Overseas
标 题: a Vanderbilt dean 在Science 上大放厥词
发信站: Unknown Space - 未名空间 (Wed Jun 9 13:12:25 2004) WWW-POST
说外国学生是a souce of labor, 没有美国学生好
他很自豪只有10%的外国学生(medical school).
加上最近的驾照规定,能不来田纳西最好不来.
FULL TEXT:
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/304/5675/1278
See how vanderbilt talk about international students on recent
SCIENCE-May-27-2004, I feel sad to hear
that.
****************************************************************************** |
|