d*****0
发帖数: 1500 | 1 上周的一手牌，live 1/2，因为桌上有3条大鱼，哥几乎全程没进局（3小时玩了两三把
，都是flop就放弃）于是来到这手牌：
哥UTG limp，btn 鱼1 raise到12，sb 鱼2 call，bb fold，哥reraise到52。
鱼1 fold，鱼2问哥如果他call了愿不愿意check down，被旁边人制止，说规则上讲必
须见到flop才能negotiate。
flop JdJc2d，villain check，哥cbet 75，villain 想了下，call，他stack 还剩80
，哥cover他。
turn Ks，villain check，哥check
river 8h，villain donk shove 82，哥tank大约一分钟，fold。
猜猜看，我们什么牌 |
|
d*****0
发帖数: 1500 | 2 6MAX NL100
villain 25/21/8 in about 40 hands
Once he 10bb 3bet me with TJs and commit to another short stack
hero about 200bb stack and villain get me covered
here is the hand,
hero CO with KK, 3bb open,
villain 3bet to 9.5bb,
hero 4bet to 29.5bb,
villain 5bet to 60bb。
hero? |
|
n***a
发帖数: 274 | 3 1. called the turn feeling too many drawing hands would fire out, and otr, I
thought his hand is very much polarized...
hero called, villain showed ato and won the pot with tptk
2. hero called, villain showed as9s, missed fd that caught a 9 ott;
was villain betting too thin on these two hands?
3. typo, anyhow, hero had no backdoor fd
4. hero folded
5. i realized the sizing mistake the moment i tossed out the chips, maybe 36
-40 be better?
donk claimed to have missed combo draw, villain showed qq... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*****0
发帖数: 1500 | 4 100bb effective stack
villain solid tag 24/21/4 at button, open 2.6bb
sb flat, hero at bb with 66 flat.
flop 69Jr, check, check, villain cbet 5bb, sb fold, hero tank raise to 14bb
villain tank reraise to 30bb, hero tank reraise to 46bb, villain reraies to
62bb.
Hero? |
|
c*****t
发帖数: 817 | 5 这个不重要。重要的是这个牌拿着set不是非得raise flop不可的。
既然raise了，难道raise的时候没想好敌人reraise allin怎么办吗？
这里raise显然不是bluff。那么就只能有三个可能。
1. raise for value. 那被shove了还想啥.秒call。
2. raise to confuse villain. 因为villain也许会觉得你raise更像semibluff。所以
代表的strengh反而没有call大。那么被推了当然也秒call？
3. raise for info。我当然觉得拿着top set raise for info很好笑。但是如果你真
是这样想的。当然秒fold。因为你拿到了info
无论如何。我觉得用不着纠结。因为事前已经做好决定了。
就我个人来说。不要说是set。这个board即使是KK我也call shove。因为我觉得
villain这牌是capped range。偷盲的人多了。但是很少有人拿着57或者44这样的牌会
在UTG+1 4BB开局偷盲。所以villain over pair或ace high flu... 阅读全帖 |
|
p******a
发帖数: 975 | 6 By "amateur", I mean someone really new to poker and only know the rules.
But no need to struggle on the meaning of this word, as long as you know
what I'm trying to say is that this mistake is stupid.
Vs unknown villain, shoving is very standard here. Even against this villain
I think shoving is fine too. The mistake I refer to is that not knowing
flush draw is huge underdog against set.
This mistake is the same as, for example, not knowing AQ has about 30%
equity against AK preflop. They shoul... 阅读全帖 |
|
y********n
发帖数: 2063 | 7 Yeah, you are right.
I have not thought through this hand. If villain do have PP, I can only get
2 streets of value. Assuming I check the turn, villain will probably bluff
the turn with his PP.
Against villain's full range, checking the turn is the best option.
If the turn get checked back, I will bet the river for value.
If villain fires on the turn, I can easily check/call. Regarding to the
river, I will probably call it off.
Thanks! |
|
d*****0
发帖数: 1500 | 8 1C/2C home game
villain is a long term gambler, doesn't care about anything and just won a
series of badbeat in half hour. 30%+ pfr and very aggressive.Now he has
350bb stack(hero covers villain) and comes this hand.
Hero with AKo limp at utg, all limp to BTN villain, who raise to 10bb as
usual.Big blind short stack shoves with 25bb.
Hero tanked and call.
Villain reshove 300+bb. Hero? |
|
p****0
发帖数: 611 | 9 D神，我的观点是PF，对上any two style,有时PF +EV的决定并非能给带来可观的盈利
。 假定你有一定的edge against villain post flop， 你完全可以fold PF event
though it's +EV. 要知道你的edge就是你的impplied odds。 如果在PF就跟 villain
对上，你完全放弃了你的impplied odds，得不偿失。
一个简单的模型。
game 1：假定你和villain 玩大小，总共两条街。 每人随机发两个数（0到1之间）。
如果第一街你的数小于等于0.5， 你fold，不损失任何value。如果在第一街你的数大
于0.5， 你就和对手all in，不管第二街的大小。 如果两条街你的数总和大于对手，
你赢2快。 如果小于对手，你输2. 玩10万手牌， 看看你最后盈利。
game 2： 假定你和villain 玩大小，总共两条街。 每人随机发两个数（0到1之间）。
如果第一街你的数小于等于0.5， 你fold，不损失任何value。如果在第一街你的数大
于0.5， 你觉定看到第二街。这里你的edge是... 阅读全帖 |
|
p****0
发帖数: 611 | 10 This hand, villain could have 1). TP good kicker, 2). two pair 47 or 49, or
3). flush, 4). over pair is less likely since he limped in PF. 5) busted
straight draw
For 1): TP good kicker, he has showdown value, make sense to check on the
turn, so very likely it's check on the river too.
For 2) two pair 47 or 49. make sense to check on the turn and bet on the
river, hoping you catch flush on the turn
For 3) flush, check on the turn make sense to see if you have full house,
but you check on the ri... 阅读全帖 |
|
n***a
发帖数: 274 | 11 印象中三四个小时之间这个大哥fof, 好像preflop没有raise过，flop没有raise过，而
且好像似乎连show down都很少。
hero TAG
pre hero HJ TT open $10,
villain smooth call on BB
flop 998dd
villain check call $12
turn 9
villain check/tank call $21
river 7 non d
villain tank all in $76, 眼神迷离，是不是一定是核桃？ |
|
p****0
发帖数: 611 | 12 1/2 full table. Villain is a good aggressive regular. Moved to this table
and quickly loss one buy in. He raised to 15 PF most of the time, won some
of the pots. showdown cards are AK,AQ, decent pair, connectors, or suited
cards. Hero had stack about 800. Villain had about 400. Villain just won a
pot after his 15 raising PF. Then came to this hand:
Hero was dealt KK at BB. Villain at MP raised to 15 as usual. folded to
hero. Hero was sure it will be heads up situation. So hero just calle... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*****0
发帖数: 1500 | 13 seabrook NH monthly 250刀 buying
哥新上桌的时候，aggression遭到凶狠抵抗，筹码损失，加上blind level提升，stack
shrink到30几个bb，然后就开始憋，偶尔在很safe的spot偷一偷，渐渐建立起tight
image。
中期一把牌，在大盲位拿着aa，tank call 小盲位的squeeze shove（笑），可惜image
太好了，前面的original raiser和中位的caller没有进来。
这把结束，stack变成healthy，大约45个bb，略大于average。于是到了这手牌。
对手是个pro，自始自终非常轻松，入局很多，且基本上都是作出正确的decision，同
时也敢于赌博，尤其有一把用bottom pair抓了一个很激进的玩家的bluff而double up
。即便如此，因为他实在入局太多，筹码其实也是起起伏伏，哪怕边缘状况处理得再好
，也经不住variance，所以在其他人水平不是很高的桌子上，哥其实并不看好他的这种
打法。
扯远了，但是由于哥其实也保持着轻松状态，且慢慢建立的tight image，他... 阅读全帖 |
|
z******n
发帖数: 8851 | 14 Don't play much on ACR anymore, in WSOP these level of players are all LAG
or TAG, so if we can't put the villain on gunshot draw on the flop, we have
to call him down, you were just unlucky. If we fold on either turn or river,
we will lose lot of equity, the villain chould have missed flush draw,
missed straight draw (9T), or total air, on the river he may thought you
missed your draw. If i were villain, I would bet more (3/4 pot size) on the
river (even with air just for balancing), villain co... 阅读全帖 |
|
p******e
发帖数: 327 | 15 Local Live Tournament.
1. Early to mid stage: Hero image is normal. Villain image to me is
relatively tight.
Hero had about 65BB. AdJd raised to 2.xBB UTG+1. Villain at UTG+2 with
over 90BB quickly called and two other callers. Pot was like 12ish BB.
Flop QdTd7c. Hero first to act, checked (and planned to check raise).
Villain quickly overbet 15BB. All folds to me. So I just called.
Turn is 9c. I thought about donk bet but checked. Villain instant all in.
What to do? Better play on flop or turn? |
|
d*****0
发帖数: 1500 | 16 所以这个river最优百分比还是跟bet size有关，而且，hero的image也影响到了
villain的决策，也就是说，这里的optimal play是hero在知道villain对hero在这里
nuts/air的估计值后，给出一个合适size的bet，让villain明知道到hero以villain对
他的估计值为标准，混杂着nut和air，仍然call不进去（-ev call）。
这个估计值，是由hero的perceiving range决定的，也就是说不同情况下，OTR hero的
optimal bet size是不同的。
举一个简单的例子，同样的line，hero的image是rock和maniac，他的river的optimal
betting size是不同的。
我的理解对么？ |
|
H*T
发帖数: 43 | 17 Such a good post with detailed technical discussions!
Somehow I disagree with the "no 5bet" reasoning. If you only 5bet with QQ+,
of course villain can fold his worse hand and only calls with AK+. But
shouldn't you 5bet bluff with a small percentage (say 10-15%)? so that
villain will fold his better hand sometimes? This would boost your EV
tremendously.
As played, my intuition is to fold on river if villain is a decent player,
since he knows I wouldn't fold given c/c on the turn.
Perhaps the bes... 阅读全帖 |
|
p****0
发帖数: 611 | 18 Hero had stack 300ish, Villain is solid and capable player. He had hero
covered. Only got 3 players left on this table. Last hand before table
combine.
Hero hold AA at BB raised to 12. Villain,at BTN called and ask if want to
check down to the river or not. Hero said nothing.
Flop Ks6c5s. Hero had two Aces, cbet 15. Villain snap all in.
Hero tank. Villain showed 7s4s. Hero? Time to fold AA? |
|
p****0
发帖数: 611 | 19 Hand 1：already played couple hours. Game dynamics was normal, no extreme
wild move, not too loose, not too tight. All players know each other. Hero
's image was semi-tight. Hero had stack about 600.
UTG: hero
MP: villain, tight player in general, can make move sometime, capable of
read. stack 1300ish
BTN: old nittish guy. had stack about 400ish
BB: young guy with short stack of 100ish
Preflop: Hero hold KhKd led out 15. MP called. BTN raised to 50. BB, hero
and MP called.
Flop: AcJc6d. H... 阅读全帖 |
|
R******d
发帖数: 976 | 20 both happened on a 3/5 table at local casino.
Hand1:
Villain is a local reg, young asian at his late 20s. Hero played few hands
with him before. Saw him the other day stacking off KK on a 34T3 board and
beat by 35s. Hero has a TAG image. V has 450 stack, hero covers.
Hero is dealt AKs at BB. Villain opens 20 from MP. BTN calls. SB folds. Hero
3bets to 75. Both V and BTN flat.
(Pot 213) Flop 446r
Hero cbets 120.
Villain tanks and shoves. BTN folds. Hero..?
Hand2:
Villain is a new guy, white male ... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*******3
发帖数: 56 | 21 周末打home game，1-2。
history： （1）villain 我们之间只打过 两三手牌。 有一手 UTG+2 open 8$， 他co
位置call， 我button 3-bet to 29, UTG+2 fold， 他tank fold， 给我看了AJo， 我
show了 47o。
（2） villain 属于 weak player, 有的时候在 后位的时候 check to him的时候 会
偷一下。绝绝大多数 都是有hand 才bet。
hero is a very tight player in his perspective.
hand:
轮到这手牌： fold to villain at CO who opens $8, hero at sb has KK. I 3-bet
to $26. Villian initially grabs 3 green chips ($75), but then tank for a
while and just call.
I put him on QQ, JJ, or AKs; I don't think he ha... 阅读全帖 |
|
h*****u
发帖数: 979 | 22 Parvati made a very smart move by using all the idols for her tribe. If
she kept hiding the unknown idol from Russell, it could destroy her
credibility in villains totally. And back to yesterday's counsel, given
the 5 heroes vs 5 villains situation, she knows she will be eliminated
eventually if the Heroes could keep more members than Villains. So her
priority should be to keep all villains in play till all heroes are gone.
After all heroes are gone (if nothing unexpected happens), Russel,
Daine |
|
c**********l
发帖数: 606 | 23 nothing wrong with the villain's play. semi-bluff with a very strong draw.
I would have done the same.
even if he is 45:55 vs. hero, he had much more than 10% fold equity.
and I would have folded if i were the hero. the villain could easily have a
set. only with evidence that the villain is capable of bluffing would I push
all-in.
as pointed out, the villain is not extremely tight, he called $15 with $200
with small suited one-gap.
I don't see anything wrong with the flop bet size.
what casin |
|
a*******a
发帖数: 451 | 24 zz
Zootopia was the most in your face mind control I have seen. The Utopian
bait has been placed as motivation to obey the elite. Good movie though.
Don't Read this if you haven't seen the movie.
This movie was great. Obviously. So well done.
But the entire time I was cringing over every single brainwashing technique
they were using to glamorize a future Utopian society.
This movie has painted a gorgeous picture of how a Utopian society could
look like. But this future is more entrenched in the ... 阅读全帖 |
|
W*****B
发帖数: 4796 | 25 影评家们高潮连连。票房会不会破纪录？将军们会去看吗？我对黑人没兴趣，所以不太
可能去看。
The Revolutionary Power of Black Panther
TIME Staff
The RevolutionaryPower of Black Panther
Marvel’s new movie marks a major milestoneBy JAMIL SMITH
The first movie I remember seeing in a theater had a black hero. Lando
Calrissian, played by Billy Dee Williams, didn’t have any superpowers, but
he ran his own city. That movie, the 1980 Star Wars sequel The Empire
Strikes Back, introduced Calrissian as a complicated human being who still
did the right t... 阅读全帖 |
|
v**e
发帖数: 8422 | 26 因惧怕TB， MGM主动用数字化把新拍电影＂红色梨明＂里的坏人从中国改为北朝鲜
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-china-red-dawn-
Reel China: Hollywood tries to stay on China's good side
Without Beijing even uttering a critical word, MGM is changing the villains
in its 'Red Dawn' remake from Chinese to North Korean. It's all about
maintaining access to the Asian superpower's lucrative box office.
China has become such an important market for U.S. entertainment companies
that one studio has taken the extraordinary step of... 阅读全帖 |
|
c**********l
发帖数: 606 | 27 River: don't see why you bet the river into a very laggish/tricky guy.
always have a plan in case villain reraise/all-in when you bet: can you
confidently fold? if the answer is no, then better check and let the
villain lead.
river decisions are rarer than flop ones, but most costly.
since villain is very laggish, I would also consider 4-betting the flop to
1. charge the draws
2. show that you can't be pushed off your hand easily.
if he reraise all-in, you can fold here more confidently than af |
|
L****n
发帖数: 490 | 28 It depends on villain's position and stack size. Short stack can shove your 3 bet with light range. EP tends to 4 bet more with value hands than Later position. It depends on your image as well. If your 3 bet percentage is too narrow, then villain's 4 bet range is mostly AA,KK. Unless villain is a maniac. |
|
M********g
发帖数: 717 | 29 I think I learned so much just by reading these two kk threads.
At first i totally agreed with you. I thought windstorm was totally off in
this spot. Just as you said, he created a so hard situation for himself by
raising so little. After reading all these posts, i started to realize what
he meant, though I am still not sure if his theory matches everyone's style
here. I would say he tangos with a little very thin ev here. I think both
strategies have merits, as far as they suit your style.
A th... 阅读全帖 |
|
p**********1
发帖数: 1458 | 30 in all likelihood, we have the equity to shove otf with minimum fold equity.
if villain is so nit as thebigslick imagine, then give her a range of TT+,
AK+, we have about 30% equity otf. now, since villain tank called 3bet, we
can take out AA/KK, so our equity will increase a bit.
the worst case is when her range has lots of SCs like JTs+, **AND** she also
call with weaker ace like AT/AJ. even then, we have about 25% equity (
taking out AA/KK). if villain fold weaker ace and only call with AQ+, ... 阅读全帖 |
|
M********g
发帖数: 717 | 31 i am a little confused here. You said"suppose both villain and you know the
station will call pre and fold on the flop very often. villain cannot have
called with TT/88/QJhh for an additional $115 when effective stack is 900. "
I agree with your conclusion, but do not understand the linkage/logic
between your reason and conclusion. I think if a calling station's existence
increases the villain's calling probability with that holding. Please
illuminate me.
the
. |
|
s*********f
发帖数: 155 | 32 stack size? Read on villain?
The board is very dry. The villain seems to have an overpair or a set based
on his action. If he is loose and aggressive, he may also have JTs (some
players love JT, me included), QJs, KJs or AJ. Overall, folding seems good
on the turn.
I rather go for a check raise on the flop if the stack is deep enough. This
can control the pot size if he checks. However, many players automatically
do a continuation bet. Your donk bet loses value if the villain c-bets on
air or wi... 阅读全帖 |
|
p**********1
发帖数: 1458 | 33 first off, I am not quite sure about my results, so take it with a grain of
salt.
anyways, i am going to try. first one, we hold Ax on Axx flop, so, villain's
hole cards combo is (47 2)=1081, AA+Ax combo is 1+(2 1)*(45 1)=1+2*45=91,
therefore 91/1081=8.4%.
second one, to simplify and be complete, we include trip and quad (if top
pair is good, trip/quad definitely is good). we are dealt 7x, then the flop
combo is (50 3)=19600. to hit top pair and trip/quad, we need:
A: 777 flop, 1 combo
B: 77x fl... 阅读全帖 |
|
n***a
发帖数: 274 | 34 我的思考
第一手确实想过raise preflop,当时的考虑时villain很少在EP raise,所以觉得TT应该
落后了,想看看有没有set flop
flop都check后,turn又给了个GSSD,觉得有可能villain是个low PP,
river call只是个bluff catcher with good pot odds看看有没有小对。
第二手确实可以Button raise，不过对这手的结果应该关系不大。
当时把villain放在AX上，flop，turn call感觉有足够的outs (4Ks,3Qs,2Js)
river call是因为给了我无法拒绝的pot odds to catch bluff。
两手牌没有raise的原因主要是因为pot control。
当然这两手牌后，有人直接说我：“playing like a calling station here”:P |
|
n*****t
发帖数: 190 | 35 I like your play in hand 1. Check/call on 998 flop is good to control the
pot and maximize the value.
For Hand 2a, I suggest that you should continue bet on turn as well. Since
villain may call your C-bet with any face cards on the flop, you do not want
to give any free card to him on the river. Plus JJ is not that powerful to
slow play here. Any face card on river could shutdown the action and there's
also some possibility to hit villain's range. Then you lose pot.
Hand 2b: I like your play her... 阅读全帖 |
|
c*****t
发帖数: 817 | 36 Quotes from this thread:
Lziueng: ... I just posted my hands here to share and discuss.
Villain: Hand 3: Could you tell me the reason why you reraised on the flop?
It would only push the hands you beat to fold and get the call with better
hands.
Lziueng: How did the result show me wrong when villian showed his Q9? I don'
t understand your logic, and I'm not going to waste my time arguing with you.
Villain: Just tell me how did you know you're ahead. Than we could discuss
this later.
Lziueng: How... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*****0
发帖数: 1500 | 37 isn't the river k a scary card that completes villain's high flush even k-
full?
Or villain's turn bet is questionable? I am kind of agree with emilym, if I
have straight/trips/sometimes even small full house, i would just call here
in hero's situation.
This is the reason, i don't understand hero's snap shove. If I were villain,
I prefer to call to c hero's hand with my AA, or just fold on turn. |
|
d*****0
发帖数: 1500 | 38 my2c,
no standard action.
factor 1: previous actions
factor 2: villain's image, hero's image, history
factor 3: pot size, if villain looks scared of money or not
IP is much better than OOP, I basically like a big bet if checked to, if
villain is not tricky. |
|
W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 39 This hand is played so strangely by villain. My guess is the strongest hand
villain can have is k9 with the turn and river check? I guess he could also
have kj/k10 or ak. Definitely should value bet river with a Q if he has it. I
would probably bet turn when check to. His hand does not look too strong
after he checks turn your hand has good equity but has no showdown value. I
think you can rep 2 pair fine with the flop call reraise since the stack is
fairly deep.
Can not really understand why... 阅读全帖 |
|
p****t
发帖数: 292 | 40 I don't play live or 300bb deep very often but I'll give it a try.
I don't like the flop raise. We are really hoping villain to just lay it
down right there which does not happen very often given the action and board
texture up to that point.
If we cannot take it down right there, I don't see many good options left
for us. If villain calls the flop, we either continue to bluff on the turn
and then we are almost committed to bluff again on the river because we have
no showdown value at all when w... 阅读全帖 |
|
c*****t
发帖数: 817 | 41
Bet
a
Well said! I definitely agree that reverse poker can be more profitable for
a single hand or against an unknown villain (that is when people start to
call you a tricky player). Balancing is more for online play and when you
play against thinking villains.
In tourneys, a similar play is called stop and go. Say you got 10BB at BB,
and button raises 3BB. You found that you got AT, which you almost never
fold at this stack size. But you know if you shove, button calls for sure
since he is pot... 阅读全帖 |
|
W********m
发帖数: 7793 | 42 River is a tough decision after check call turn. It is true. You really
need to have a good read to make the decision for check folding or check
calling river. If like you said "loose donk may choose to shove river with
most of his range", then our decision becomes easy--close you eyes and call.
There are a lot of factor needs to be considered at river, such as " does
he turn pocket 6s into a bluff by shoving river?", "does he 2 barrel bluff
complete air on turn and river?", "does bobo's ... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*****0
发帖数: 1500 | 43
remember MM LAO SHI once said, pot control works only in those situations
that you are not sure where you are.
And adjusting the hand-strength-to-pot-size ratio based on those factors
like table dynamic, history, villain style and so on, is way important.
E.G. I wouldn't mind to commit 100bb with my TPTK+ hand with loose bad
villain who constantly pushes with funny hands. But i would definitely fold
my monster hand to live stone LAO YEYE's shove without hesitating.
Back to this hand, i still th... 阅读全帖 |
|
l*****g
发帖数: 1128 | 44 I would bet around 500 or shove on the turn. Villain had either flush or trip 9s. 6s
full was very dangerous on that board.Your 150 turn bet was very
inconsistent with your line there. I don't know if you were scared or you
were trying to slow play there. To me, no need to slow play with only sixes
full of 9s on that board.On the river, 300 bet from villain looked like a
full house(98) to me, but you had to call after you invested that much. Your
inconsistent play under represented your hand a l... 阅读全帖 |
|
f*****g
发帖数: 15860 | 45 let me guess:
hero actually shoved on the turn, with two pair+flush draw, facing a bet,
few ppl would be disciplined to not shove here (for the stack sizes too).
but villain snap called with AK (like any "good" 1/2 player would do).
however, river was a K or Q, hero got counterfeited.
now in retro, hero is second guessing whether he should call turn and re-
evaluate on the river, or "potentially" lose less if K or Q falls, or win
more if club shows and villain cannot lay down.
villain |
|
n***a
发帖数: 274 | 46 it's probably should be a fold against that particular villain anyway.
on the other hand i still don't like calling here because either way there'
ll be a tough decision on the river
my logic is if i call turn and check the river, villain would sense i don't
have a k, and bet either he has a k or not
if i call the turn,i think i have to call the river, and therefore pot
committed.
in that case, shove the turn might prevent some weaker and to check down the
river
if i was playing in position, i t... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*****0
发帖数: 1500 | 47 "I thought he was just mad at me cause I been stealing the pot a couple
hands earlier "
So you basically is an aggressive guy as well?
If your image is very loose and aggressive, then it is ez to commit the top
two pair hands with relatively short stack. The main reason is PPL are more
than happy to play against you with medium strong hands e.g. top-pair-top-
kicker, even just top-pair. Cos they usually think you are too loose,
basically hand like top-pair will get you most of the time.
I once t... 阅读全帖 |
|
l*****g
发帖数: 1128 | 48 You might be right. He claimed he had K10 and he said he showed his cards to
the guy who was next to him (and that guy confirmed it), but I didn't see
it. So who knows. However, I folded my top two yesterday on the river in one
hand. Another session I folded my J high flush on the river. In that hand I
raised the villain on the turn and then bet 75 on the river when I hit my
flush. Villain check raised me all in and I folded. I have seen people
folding big hands in this game. This villain told m... 阅读全帖 |
|
l*****g
发帖数: 1128 | 49 One hand that I like to share just to show the beauty of this game.
I have 1500 stack. Villain has 330 stack. I have just been on this table. I
hold 77 in MP. Several limpers in front of me. I limp also. Villain who sits
direct to my left raises to 20 in LP. Everyone calls and I call. Flop K 8 8
rainbow. All check to villain. He c-bets 40. Folds to me. I don't think he
hits the K and I think my 77 is probably good here. So I raise him to 80. He
tanks for about a minute and reraises me to 180. I ... 阅读全帖 |
|
p**********1
发帖数: 1458 | 50 if hero folded to such a small donk bet on the river, then she should not
have bet the turn in the first place. the primary reason to bet the turn is
villain will call with weaker queen often enough. with that in mind, villain
's river bet looks like a blocking bet for a cheap showdown. if villain will
not call that turn bet with enough weaker queen, then check to induce a
river bluff is better. after all, on the turn, hero is way ahead or way
behind. frankly the worse part is show and fold, wit... 阅读全帖 |
|
