X******n
发帖数: 914 | 1 All the authors have signed this retraction with the exception of Y.-Y.L.,
who is deceased. |
l**********1
发帖数: 5204 | 2 Totally it comes,
pls refer
March 2013 mitbbs bio ban one post,
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Biology/31788701.html |
g*********3
发帖数: 177 | 3 这篇文章。。。。也能retract啊。。。LZ能否给出链接，google了下没找到出处。谢
谢。 |
p*****c
发帖数: 20445 | 4 这篇文章背后的故事很多。。。好像美陆台都牵涉到了？
【在 g*********3 的大作中提到】
: 这篇文章。。。。也能retract啊。。。LZ能否给出链接，google了下没找到出处。谢
: 谢。
|
l**********1
发帖数: 5204 | 5 http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v482/n7384/full/nature1080
【在 g*********3 的大作中提到】
: 这篇文章。。。。也能retract啊。。。LZ能否给出链接，google了下没找到出处。谢
: 谢。
|
l**********1
发帖数: 5204 | 6 http://ipv6.weiming.info/zhuti/Biology/31704723/
21st floor
only this Nature letter gave us one contribution, |
H****N
发帖数: 997 | 7 This makes one wonder how many more papers in CNS are actually junk but will
never be found out. |
l**********1
发帖数: 5204 | 8 wet bio fields if WB figure used high contaction those CNS also N sister if
IF higher than
20.0 might be >1/3
there are fasle result/s. >1/10 could be retracted within one or two decade.
..
will
【在 H****N 的大作中提到】
: This makes one wonder how many more papers in CNS are actually junk but will
: never be found out.
|
l**********1
发帖数: 5204 | 9 that lab Cell paper major Erratum also,
web link:
http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/2013/11/06/nature-yanks-co
HTTP://download.cell.com/pdf/PIIS0092867413005308.pdf?intermedi
then those cited above Cell paper 319 times those papers when do their
Errata ? |
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 10 That's right, it turn out high impact paper in lower IF jounrals have best
reproducibility. If I remember correctly is above 70% by someone completely
independent.
if
decade.
【在 l**********1 的大作中提到】
: wet bio fields if WB figure used high contaction those CNS also N sister if
: IF higher than
: 20.0 might be >1/3
: there are fasle result/s. >1/10 could be retracted within one or two decade.
: ..
:
: will
|
