s*********e
发帖数: 132 | 1 最近我收到了IO 0041的RFE，对contribution提出了质疑，提到了thousands citation
. 请问有朋友遇到过这个IO吗？历史搜索没看到这个IO，难道是个新人？以下是具体的
RFE，不知是不是模板。还请有经验的朋友帮忙看看。谢谢！
You submitted letters of opinion and a record of your citatory history, but
the evidence, while demonstrating original contributions, does not
substantiate original contributions of "major significance" in a field whose
very top scientists (according to Google Scholar) have garnered citations
numbered well in the thousands.
To assist in determining whether your contributions are original and of
major significance in the fields, you may submit objective, independent
evidence that:
. people throughout the field currently consider your work important
. your contributions have provoked widespread public commentary in the field
. your publications have garnered a significant number of citations
. your work is being implemented by others, evidence such as:
.contracts with companies using your products
.licensed technology being used by others
.patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant in the field
And you may submit testimony and/or letters from experts discussing your
contributions of major significance. Please not that letters and testimonies
, if submitted, must provide as much detail as possible about your
contributions and must explain in detail how the contributions are original
(not merely replicating the work of others) and how they are of major
significance. General statements regarding the importance of your endeavors
which are not supported by documentary evidence are insufficient. | s*********e
发帖数: 132 | 2 在版上看到这篇0214的回复，和我的RFE一模一样。。。只是没有针对我case的部分，
完全是0214的模板，不知道是不是他的徒弟啊
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/Immigration/33891675.html
citation
but
whose
【在 s*********e 的大作中提到】
: 最近我收到了IO 0041的RFE，对contribution提出了质疑，提到了thousands citation
: . 请问有朋友遇到过这个IO吗？历史搜索没看到这个IO，难道是个新人？以下是具体的
: RFE，不知是不是模板。还请有经验的朋友帮忙看看。谢谢！
: You submitted letters of opinion and a record of your citatory history, but
: the evidence, while demonstrating original contributions, does not
: substantiate original contributions of "major significance" in a field whose
: very top scientists (according to Google Scholar) have garnered citations
: numbered well in the thousands.
: To assist in determining whether your contributions are original and of
: major significance in the fields, you may submit objective, independent
| s*********e
发帖数: 132 | | l*****i
发帖数: 296 | | t***o
发帖数: 335 | 5 跟我一样，我是0258 RFE的
citation
but
whose
【在 s*********e 的大作中提到】
: 最近我收到了IO 0041的RFE，对contribution提出了质疑，提到了thousands citation
: . 请问有朋友遇到过这个IO吗？历史搜索没看到这个IO，难道是个新人？以下是具体的
: RFE，不知是不是模板。还请有经验的朋友帮忙看看。谢谢！
: You submitted letters of opinion and a record of your citatory history, but
: the evidence, while demonstrating original contributions, does not
: substantiate original contributions of "major significance" in a field whose
: very top scientists (according to Google Scholar) have garnered citations
: numbered well in the thousands.
: To assist in determining whether your contributions are original and of
: major significance in the fields, you may submit objective, independent
| p**p
发帖数: 2493 | | s*********e
发帖数: 132 | 7 EB1A
NIW不会有千次引用的说法吧
【在 p**p 的大作中提到】
: 请问是 EB1A 还是 NIW？
| z*****7
发帖数: 6 | |
|
