x****s
发帖数: 356 | 1 That is why a mature player wont interfer the in/out judgement of referee.
Whatever it is on the hard courts, take it. I think she is so aggressive, that
a weak referee will be effected by her. Of course, that is my 2 cents, no
evidence. Frankly say, that referee sucks. 因为这几乎是在鼓励运动员干扰比赛.
On the clay, you can point out the sign, and ask referee to recheck it.But if
referee insists another sign, even chair of judge committe cant change the
judge of the right score.
But on grass or hard courts, ref |
|
c****r
发帖数: 576 | 2 昨天写了rebuttal letter，今天收到编辑的信，说稍微改改就能被接受，结果还不错
。编辑回信原文：Thank you for providing your response to the concerns raised
by Referee 3 (previously Referee 2). We have passed the previously missing
report of Referee 1 to our Associate Editor along with your rebuttal. In the
light of the positive comments of Referee 1 and your response to Referee 3
our Associate Editor feels that the manuscript can be accepted for
publication in BMC .... |
|
D*a
发帖数: 6830 | 3 http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110427/full/472391a.html?utm_so
Peer review of scientific papers in top journals is bogged down by
unnecessary demands for extra lab work, argues Hidde Ploegh.
Hidde Ploegh
Submit a biomedical-research paper to Nature or other high- profile journals
, and a common recommendation often comes back from referees: perform
additional experiments. Although such extra work can provide important
support for the results being presented, all too frequently it represents
ins... 阅读全帖 |
|
j*****5
发帖数: 235 | 4 【 以下文字转载自 Physics 讨论区 】
发信人: joe1995 (Joe), 信区: Physics
标 题: 投Nature杂志审稿一问
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Sep 3 14:37:36 2013, 美东)
前段时间关于PRL appeal在这里问过，受益匪浅。老板不牛，这两杂志都是第一次投，
给不上太多帮助或有意义的comments。
是这样，Nature审了近三月(估计史上最长了，可能是因为像editor说的暑假期间
available的referee少，也可能与文章方向有关)。一个Referee提了很多问题，评语说
我们结论is of interest and may have potential applications，但must answer a
number of questions before considering possibility of recommendation of the
manuscript for publication。另一Referee直接拒稿，理由是觉得我们结果基于一种
已众所周知的机制，而不是我们在文章... 阅读全帖 |
|
j*****5
发帖数: 235 | 5 【 以下文字转载自 Physics 讨论区 】
发信人: joe1995 (Joe), 信区: Physics
标 题: 投Nature杂志审稿一问
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Sep 3 14:37:36 2013, 美东)
前段时间关于PRL appeal在这里问过，受益匪浅。老板不牛，这两杂志都是第一次投，
给不上太多帮助或有意义的comments。
是这样，Nature审了近三月(估计史上最长了，可能是因为像editor说的暑假期间
available的referee少，也可能与文章方向有关)。一个Referee提了很多问题，评语说
我们结论is of interest and may have potential applications，但must answer a
number of questions before considering possibility of recommendation of the
manuscript for publication。另一Referee直接拒稿，理由是觉得我们结果基于一种
已众所周知的机制，而不是我们在文章... 阅读全帖 |
|
s***r
发帖数: 1121 | 6 投了一篇top journal， referee 说methodology有大问题。 按referee的comments,文
章是必毙无疑。
editor 让major revisions,说topic has potential。 其实，我文章的methodology
是follow JPE 一篇文章。 referee 说methodology 有大问题，是根据一篇未发表的
working paper。 而且这篇working paper 直接挑战JPE的文章的methodology.
如果按照referee的comment， 我基本上要重新design tests and redo everythting.
所以我计划methodology 不变， 作些额外的简单tests证明我的methodology没有大问
题。In addition, I will follow referee's comments to make other changes.
我的问题是：大家说这样可行不？revision后被接受的可能性/或者进入3rd round
review 的可能性有多大？谢谢。 |
|
U*****e
发帖数: 2882 | 7 【 以下文字转载自 EconomicResearch 俱乐部 】
发信人: FatRat (Fat Rat), 信区: EconomicResearch
标 题: sharing articles 1 --how to publish in a top economics journal
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jan 3 14:34:37 2012, 美东)
I would like to share some articles that I collected overtime about how to
do research. They are inspiring to me. Hopefully you find them helpful too.
Unameme, feel free to forward to Economics:
http://cheaptalk.org/2011/05/04/how-to-get-published-in-a-top-economics-journal/
How to Get Published in a (Top) ... 阅读全帖 |
|
v******e
发帖数: 1715 | 8 一个实验的文章，编辑指定审稿人后半个月，编辑分别发了封信催了一下。
Referee A 两天后就提交正式意见，
Referee B 一个月后才提交。
Referee A 意见很短，极其不友善。
大意是，文章的两个结论，第一个不重要，第二个也不重要，应该被拒。
言词之中感叹号，问号充分表达了对这个实验的鄙夷的色彩。
感觉应该是个做理论的人的意见。
平心而论，真正做实验的同行应该知道这个实验实现起来没那么容易。
Referee B 没什么意见，比较友善，说这个实验有趣、新颖，揭示了..........
但提了好几个小问题，洋洋洒洒写了有一页，
但几个问题都是一句话可以回答的实验和分析的细节，
说只要把这几个问题的解答添加在文章里，就适合发表在PRL上。
然后编辑就拒了，说建议发别的杂志；或者回应好Referee的意见也可以再投PRL。
各位，有什么建议吗？
难道现在PRL真得越来越难发了？ |
|
m****r
发帖数: 310 | 9 最近一片文章第一轮审稿意见出来了，遭遇到流氓审稿人。虽然以前也常有不公平的审
稿人，但这次的情况尤其让人无语，也希望有更多经验的人给点宝贵的意见。
基本情况是：两个审稿人，referee B给了极高的评价，并强烈推荐发表，但是他的
report比较短，因为他认为本文已经写的非常好，所以没有长的不必要评论。
referee A不同意，要求送PRB。基本理由是本文的考虑已经有文章讨论了，本文只是一
个详细讨论。现在让我说明一下他这个理由有多流氓：
1. 他的这个判断是基于一篇和我们这篇文章同时（6月份）放在arXiv上还没发表的一
篇文章作出的。我先不说此文与我们文章根本不同，单以这个时间来论，就知道这种理
由多么荒唐。
2. 事实上，他说的那篇文章除了有一个关键词的英文表达是和我们文章类似外，物理
上毫无半点关联，研究的基本topic都相差十万八千里。甚至不是做这个领域的人都完
全可以确定那篇文章和我们的文章不在讨论同一个问题。我真是不知道如何表达自己的
无语之情！
3. 他的严重偏见显然是来自我们在引用参考文献上让他不满。其实我们已经引了许多
文章，但估计一不小心少引了他的，或者引了他... 阅读全帖 |
|
m********a
发帖数: 12601 | 10 message received一般就是referee不审了，所以1月初发出去的2个referee全军覆没了
，然后editor又找个2个referee，其中一个回信说不能审
现在的状态是，文章在一个referee哪里，EDITOR还需要再找一个referee |
|
s******4
发帖数: 1322 | 11 是有这么一句话：“This concludes our review process”。请问在给DAE的信里是否
可要求送新的referee里审？
--不可以。你也不是写信给DAE, 你是写信给Editor, formally request an appeal
with DAE.
你可以在信里suggest DAE name. DAE name list在PRL网页上有。
editorial policy里提到DAE may act as “super”
referee and evaluate the manuscript as a specialist or may seek further
anonymous referee evaluation.
--如果DAE决定找referee, 是他的决定。你没有任何立场可以影响他的决定。你所能做
的就是给Editor写信request你的文章发给DAE而已。当然你要付上对最近一轮ref
report的rebuttal
个人觉得appeal几率小，可能是因为如果DAE只是
review了一下所有以前版本的manuscript, com... 阅读全帖 |
|
j*****5
发帖数: 235 | 12 前段时间关于PRL appeal在这里问过，受益匪浅。老板不牛，这两杂志都是第一次投，
给不上太多帮助或有意义的comments。
是这样，Nature审了近三月(估计史上最长了，可能是因为像editor说的暑假期间
available的referee少，也可能与文章方向有关)。一个Referee提了很多问题，评语说
我们结论is of interest and may have potential applications，但must answer a
number of questions before considering possibility of recommendation of the
manuscript for publication。另一Referee直接拒稿，理由是觉得我们结果基于一种
已众所周知的机制，而不是我们在文章所解释的机理。似乎Referee并没认真地看
supplementary information，在那里我们给了一些实验证据。
Editor给的结论是cannot be more positive on this occasion but ho... 阅读全帖 |
|
j*****5
发帖数: 235 | 13 前段时间关于PRL appeal在这里问过，受益匪浅。老板不牛，这两杂志都是第一次投，
给不上太多帮助或有意义的comments。
是这样，Nature审了近三月(估计史上最长了，可能是因为像editor说的暑假期间
available的referee少，也可能与文章方向有关)。一个Referee提了很多问题，评语说
我们结论is of interest and may have potential applications，但must answer a
number of questions before considering possibility of recommendation of the
manuscript for publication。另一Referee直接拒稿，理由是觉得我们结果基于一种
已众所周知的机制，而不是我们在文章所解释的机理。似乎Referee并没认真地看
supplementary information，在那里我们给了一些实验证据。
Editor给的结论是cannot be more positive on this occasion but ho... 阅读全帖 |
|
T*********r
发帖数: 11175 | 14 遇到这种说和那篇文章有overlap的文章最难搞，一般只能转投
那种referee就是存心恶心人而已
我们曾经有碰到论文比一篇和我们讨论同一问题的文章晚了两周不到（当年因为日本大
地震，我和合作者逃难回国耽搁了）
内容相关但两面都是独立工作，侧重点不同，都是几十页的文章，而且我们也
acknowledge了有这么一篇相关工作
结果被那个editor交到前一文章的作者直接被毙了，说有overlap
那个referee之前拿着我第一篇文章里一个piont展开写了好几篇
到处要credit，想把我们后续文章给封杀。
最后改投一下，一个字没改就发了。
还有一次也是，两篇文章，前后几周，他们讨论了两个信道寻找某个东西，我们建议不
同的两个信道寻找同一个东西
结果竟然被说成有overlap。。。。不准发
我改投，把这篇referee report和澄清的信发给下一杂志的editor，后来重新找人
referee就收了
从作者看，两比较恶心的referee全是我博士老板的博士后出身，非常熟的人。。。
acceptable, |
|
p*********2
发帖数: 31 | 15 有始有终，上来更新一下：
第一轮审稿的report收到了，一共三个意见
Referee A: "To conclude, I believe that this paper can be published in
Physical Review Letters in its present form."
Referee B:"With no doubt, the results presented in the manuscript deserve
publication. But in the referee's opinion, the manuscript, possibly after
some extension, would be more suitable for Physical Review B than Physical
Review Letters. The manuscript includes many calculation details, which
makes it interesting rather for a narrow group of ex... 阅读全帖 |
|
p*********2
发帖数: 31 | 16 有始有终，上来更新一下：
第一轮审稿的report收到了，一共三个意见
Referee A: "To conclude, I believe that this paper can be published in
Physical Review Letters in its present form."
Referee B:"With no doubt, the results presented in the manuscript deserve
publication. But in the referee's opinion, the manuscript, possibly after
some extension, would be more suitable for Physical Review B than Physical
Review Letters. The manuscript includes many calculation details, which
makes it interesting rather for a narrow group of ex... 阅读全帖 |
|
j****s
发帖数: 5092 | 17 友情提示，人家给Referral Bonus
Saratoga Star Aquatic currently offers referral bonus to our existing
students and families. You will get 10%
referral bonus of the amount that the referee has paid for their swimming
lessons. You will get a referral bonus
ticket after the referee has registered the lesson. The referral ticket will
be valid and issued after the referee
stays in the class for over one month. The referral bonus will be used for
tuition or membership fee for your
future session. You can bring... 阅读全帖 |
|
a*******e
发帖数: 346 | 18 亞跆聯網站上的新聞發布。。 這個題目也太聳人聽聞啦
Shocking Act of Deception by Chinese Taipei
In an amazing turn of events a Chinese Taipei player tried to pull a
fast one over the taekwondo world
�
The first day of the Taekwondo Championship at the 16th Asian Games
started with a storm that had the capabilities of turning into a
hurricane but fortunately was defused with a timely and prudent
intervention of the taekwondo officials and the championship was able to
weather the storm and pass through it safely.
Ma... 阅读全帖 |
|
A***W
发帖数: 419 | 19 看看他那文章是在什么野鸡“国际会议”野鸡“杂志”上的：
http://copy-shake-paste.blogspot.com/2012/06/turkish-mock-confe
WASET is a very stylish site, also it impresses with its content: links
with international refereed journals, international conferences that
organized almost in every subject... But if you delve into the issue a bit,
you learn that this site only shows as if your paper was published in a
journal which it is not, and it also shows like as if you attended the
international conferences, which you didn't. He ... 阅读全帖 |
|
i******4
发帖数: 20643 | 20 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
donaghy (I am an NBA referee) 于 (Sat Mar 24 12:13:40 2012, 美东) 提到:
有那么点倒货的时间,多看两篇paper,或者多学点编程,多跟美国人交流交流,为将来能
混上个更体面的工作做更好的准备,这样多好?
不这样干会死啊??
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
donaghy (I am an NBA referee) 于 (Sat Mar 24 12:31:45 2012, 美东) 提到:
还特玛报警,嫌丢人还丢的不够么?
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
alive (活着) 于 (Sat Mar 24 12:33:03 2012, 美东) 提到:
去死吧
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
donaghy (I am an NBA referee) 于 (Sat Mar 2... 阅读全帖 |
|
b********9
发帖数: 749 | 21 今天收到期刊主编的信。
I now have the referee's and the co-editor's reports on your paper.The the
co-editor have strong concerns regarding the overall structure of your
paper. The referee is more positive than the co-editor......In the
presence of these objections, I regret that we cannot publish your paper.
But if you can address all these concerns, you are welcome to submit it as
a new submission.
但是co-editor并没有提供 report。这个算是怎么回事？是R&R还是会送到新的referee
?回答了
referee的意见后, 成功机率多大？大家有无类似经历？ |
|
h*****n
发帖数: 924 | 22 攻击referee从来是不明智的
但考虑到referee里asshole实在多，赞一下。。。
另外，editor不读文章，或者读了后同意作者，在读了这个reply之后，可以discredit
那个referee
但如果editor自己读了文章站在那个referee一边，会大大discredit作者。
those |
|
b********y
发帖数: 891 | 23 二/三流杂志。
第一轮referees' reports很好，editor的信也很friendly,只要求一些minor revision.
revision submitted之后，我和co-author（比较有名的senior professor)都很有信心。
没想到昨天收到final decision,让人大跌眼镜。
editor突然又请了第三个referee,说因为原先两个referee对我们的方向不熟。
第三个referee的reports无比的差，从literature review,到experiment design,到
methodology,到analysis,到results,全被批的体无完肤。
editor的于是给的final decision是，rejection.
但是最后他说，
Although this is not the result you were perhaps hoping for, you do have
some comments that will help you revise the paper for an audience in... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*****r
发帖数: 1635 | 24 MS的发源是OR及应用的专业杂志，现在能成为TOP的综合杂志，是非常牛了。
金融会计的TOP JOURNAL（e.g., JF等）只能在本领域称雄，都不是综合杂志。
而MS除了在OR/OM领域外，在Strategy-Organization等领域基本等于TOP的SMJ，在
Marketing领域基本等于TOP的Marketing Science。在Information领域基本等于TOP的
ISR。
如果要在管理领域只选一本TOP Journal，选到Management Science可能异议是最小的
（当然金融会计的肯定会不服气）。
MS的审稿一般是3关
1。Department Editor先非常快的初审，
2。如果过了1关，一个Asso Editor会细审一道，
3。如果过了2关，才会到3个referee手上
因此能到referee手上的论文已经是非常不错的文章了。大多数文章都过不了1，2关。
而MS的referee report明显比别的TOP Journal（例如Mark Scie， SMJ）的详细，有价
值。文章即便被拒，如果能改到能圆满回答referee的意见，投到MS... 阅读全帖 |
|
i******t
发帖数: 798 | 25 我现在正在申请一个lab的 scientist职位
要求 1 cv 2 research statement 3 referee的email电话 然后吧 123 发给他
我想问一下
我能不能先发 1和2 他如果对我有兴趣 我想和他谈谈是否是双方需要的位置
然后再给他referee的人
原因是 我应该和referee 提前打个招呼吧？ 如果 对方根本不想要我 这样很打扰
referee啊
或者我的理解有误
请帮忙给点意见吧
thx |
|
T*******g
发帖数: 2322 | 26 二审其实没有什么必要过referee，因为他们的反应90%的情况是可以预期的，真是浪费
双方的时间。
二审真的是需要editor做决定的时候。很考察editor的水平和责任感。
有时候一个paper有比较严重的缺陷，但是一部分referee很正面没看出来缺陷（很正常
）而给了minor revision，这时候你把修改稿发回给这些referee，他只可能说“文章
非常好，接收”，这些意见对你editor做明智的决定实际上是负面的。
甚至有时候只有editor or AE看出来了缺陷，发回给referee就更是自己找反对自己的
意见去了。 |
|
a****t
发帖数: 7 | 27 来自主题: Immigration版 - 推荐信三问
况。
I suggest submit 5 to 6 letters, at least 4 - 5 independent letters + 1 from
current employer. You may not get a response from everyone. I would do
several rounds until you get enough letters.
Write a letter first explaining what the letter is for and say that you'll
draft the letter for him/her to edit.
Critical part is do not let the referees write the letters, you have to do
this yourself (either through attorney, or yourself). Letters need to be
very strong, each covering different p... 阅读全帖 |
|
p*********h
发帖数: 117 | 28 【 以下文字转载自 EB1_RFE 俱乐部 】
发信人: passthrough (thoroughly), 信区: EB1_RFE
标 题: 求助！TSC XM100RFE
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Oct 10 00:59:00 2013, 美东)
EB1A直接pp，拿到RFE好多天了。Case是版上某大律师接的，当时接收就说只是个
doable的case，很可能招RFE。弄了大半年，背景很边缘，没什么硬货，果然还是被RFE
了。现在正在找牛的refees和合作公司的support letter。自己postdoc也快做完了，
和lp都等着卡找工作。希望各位能帮忙多出谋划策！
律师Claim的是老三样。遇到著名的XM100，承认了review和authorship，不承认
contribution。理由都是大家见过的常规套话：
对于Contribution,IO注意到了：
You have submitted several letters of support
Google Scholar 128 citations
Two Chinese Patents
Fir... 阅读全帖 |
|
D***a
发帖数: 471 | 29 信里写着，
A previous referee was unable to review this and suggested you.
We welcome you as a referee for the xxx journals and thank you for
any help you can give us. Since you are new, we would appreciate
your checking and updating your record via our referee server
(); particularly your contact information
and expertise/interests.
一看就是不是因为知道你expertise才请的。referee的网页上没显示审是哪个杂志，只
显示最后发的杂志。由得文章没通过就发到低一级的了。邀请函是写明了最初投的是哪
个杂志，所以想加上。 |
|
p**********n
发帖数: 11 | 30 俺最近想搬进这个公寓，今天打电话问了一下，如果有referee的话，referee能有一些
discount。所以，诚征一个referee大家平分啊。（主要是有100刀的 non-refundable
deposite，让俺很不爽，所以才惦记他们的referee discount）
俺的手机号：713-584-8047 |
|
l*x
发帖数: 14021 | 31 I am not gonna be able to explain everything to you, or am I trying to
change your opinion. I just explain the reality whether you agree or not.
I said consistency, nor fairness. The first thing I said was it's not
possible to be fair all the time, that's why the best we can do is to keep
it consistent. That's what I said happened in the game. Whether you think
the calls were fair or not, it's up to you.
Between top teams, referees usually let the players play out and don't throw
as many flags. ... 阅读全帖 |
|
H******n
发帖数: 4072 | 32 反正就是sanctioned的比赛都要一referee。
umpire相当于裁判。referee相当于裁判长，要懂蛇形排镇还有单循环时的次序。这些都不难，难得是靠referee需要先当上umpire并且在什么什么级别的比赛裁上N场才可以考referee。 |
|
H******n
发帖数: 4072 | 33 Dear [HokieMan],
Glad to hear of your tournament plans. I don't see any problems with you
running a 0-star in [city name]. Since it's invitation only, it shouldn't
have much of an impact on any other tournaments in the region--but that will
be the call of the SE Regional Tournament Coordinator, L.A. Johnston. When
you're ready to submit paperwork, send a completed Sanction Request Form,
sanction fee check, and draft entry blank to LA. All forms and LA's mailing
address are on the USATT website.
... 阅读全帖 |
|
L****e
发帖数: 584 | 34 下面两段来源于World Cup referees outrun players。此文发表在雅虎。作者是2002
日韩世界杯的裁判。他是美国人。
The first fitness test requires speed. A referee runs 40 meters six times.
Each of the six sprints needs to be completed in 6.2 seconds for a male
referee. He is allowed 1 minute and 30 seconds between each sprint.
The second test examines the referee's stamina in repeated high-intensity
runs. He must run 150 meters in 30 seconds, and then must walk 50 meters in
35 seconds. This is repeated 20 times, which equals 10 laps ar |
|
r*********e
发帖数: 29495 | 35 The FA have charged Sir Alex Ferguson for improper conduct after comments di
rected at referee Martin Atkinson following Manchester United's defeat to Ch
elsea.
Ferguson has until 1600 GMT on Tuesday, March 8 to respond to the charge, wh
ich relates to comments made about Atkinson immediately after Tuesday night'
s 2-1 defeat. The United boss was fuming at Atkinson over his failure to dis
miss Chelsea goalscorer David Luiz for clear fouls on Javier Hernandez and W
ayne Rooney after the Brazilian... 阅读全帖 |
|
B******e
发帖数: 16928 | 36 我根本没在一开始就说裁判是随机的，是不是用data来说话，statistical analysis的
精髓是根据data来make statistical inference, 我现在不知道裁判是不是fair,我只
是test hypothesis
Null Hypothesis:The referee is fair
Alternative Hypothesis: The referee is not fair
你综合这场比赛裁判所有可判可不判的data（不要只是踢脚，裁判是判所有的犯规而不
只是踢脚裁判）来draw conclusion，就是you cannot reject the null at ordinary
confidence level，就这么简单，当然如果你只拿裁判偏向一方的而不是based on all
data, your conclusion is biased,比如你只拿了米兰2黄的标准来看巴萨哪些没判，
你再拿那个标准看看是否有哪些对米兰有利的判罚或者没判罚呢，正如我上面说的，裁
判不可能每个判罚都记得，所以在可判可不判这种模棱两可的情况下他也只能下意识地... 阅读全帖 |
|
d****o
发帖数: 32610 | 37 Former FIFA President Joao Havelange has made some quite sensational, and
potentially damaging, allegations by claiming that the 1966 and 1974 World
Cups were fixed so that England and Germany would win respectively.
The 1966 World Cup held in England has been the centre of a number of
conspiracy theories over the years. These include England’s quarter final
victory over Argentina when the hosts won 1-0 after the South Americans had
seen their captain Antonio Rattin controversially handed a stra... 阅读全帖 |
|
y*****f
发帖数: 1073 | 38 The Italian official accused last week of favouring Argentina and Lionel
Messi has been chosen to referee their World Cup final against Germany.
Nicola Rizzoli, a 42-year-old who refereed the 2013 Champions League final
at Wembley, will take charge of the match in the Maracanã on Sunday but
his appointment may be controversial.
Rizzoli was the target of criticism from the Belgium coach, Marc Wilmots,
after the 1-0 quarter-final defeat by Argentina last Saturday.
Wilmots claimed: “I don’t wa... 阅读全帖 |
|
e***y
发帖数: 1443 | 39 USTA注册裁判入门指南之一
从上次参加Winston Salem ATP 250的时候就说要写个关于做USTA裁判的帖子，但是乱
七八糟的事不断，就搁下了。昨天旧事重提，理理思路，现在和大家分享一下。
USTA的架构
USTA是独立于ATP和WTA的组织，属于ITF，我们平时在美国见到的比赛中，除了ITA（
NCAA）、ATP/WTA，基本其他比赛都归USTA管，不过虽然USOPEN是有ATP/WTA积分的，但
是也归USTA管。不同组织的规则稍有不同，比如每球之间的时间啦之类。
USTA下分很多个section，如Eastern,Southern,Mid-Atlantic,Southern California等
等，有的section管几个州，有的只管半个州。好了，没用的就不扯了。
裁判的分类
大家最熟悉的，肯定是主裁(Chair Umpire)和线审（Line Umpire)。但其实还有一些不
为圈外人知的Position
Chief Umpire(不知道中文，我称之为老板)：一般每个tournament都会有一个，负责雇
人，制定Draw，处理任何突发事件；
Referee(... 阅读全帖 |
|
b******s
发帖数: 1089 | 40 看到大家谈resubmission和revision的区别，我也顺便问一下。有一篇co-author的
paper回复如下：
Dear Dr XXX,
Your manuscript, "XXXXX", has now been seen by 3 referees, whose comments
are attached below. While they find this work of potential interest, as do
we, they have raised substantive points that in our view need to be
addressed before we can consider publication in Nature Cell Biology.Should
further experimental data allow you to address these criticisms, we would be
happy to consider a revised manuscript (unless, of cour... 阅读全帖 |
|
x****h
发帖数: 78 | 41 之前在让他们推荐的时候就发过简历的，这次不过又重新update了最新的简历，并无实
质内容上的改变。
我不可能把我申请的每个职位都跟referee说吧，而且这次他联系referee完全没兆头阿
，我这边面试都还没有进行，如果不是其中一个referee forward了他的email，我压根
就不知道他要做reference check了。我想他也许先让我面试，也要面试过了我才通知
我的referee吧。
至于原因么，都是隔墙看着那边的花香，另外经历了学术工业界，各有各的好吧，感觉
金钱已经不是唯一动力了。学术界有个积累，自己为自己干活（如果做到教授的话）。 |
|
d****i
发帖数: 123 | 42 Nature子刊.
三个Reviewers，一个很正，另外两个提出好多问题，但也没有说拒。以下是Editor的
决定。
Dear XXX,
Your manuscript has now been seen by 3 referees, whose comments are attached
below. And in light of their advice, I am sorry to say that we are unable
to offer to publish it in Nature XXX, at least in its present form.
You will see that, while our experts find your study of some value and
interest, they raise substantive concerns that cast doubt on the wider
implications of your findings and their suitability to a broad audien... 阅读全帖 |
|
b********9
发帖数: 749 | 43 今天收到期刊主编的信。
I now have the referee's and the co-editor's reports on your paper.The the
co-editor have strong concerns regarding the overall structure of your
paper. The referee is more positive than the co-editor......In the
presence of these objections, I regret that we cannot publish your paper.
But if you can address all these concerns, you are welcome to submit it as
a new submission.
但是co-editor并没有提供 report。这个算是怎么回事？是R&R还是会送到新的referee?回答了
referee的意见后, 成功机率多大？大家有无类似经历？ |
|
h*****g
发帖数: 35 | 44 去年5月独立投了一篇文章到一top journal,到9月收到了reviews, Associate Editor
建议"Both referees who are experts in the field are very positive about the
paper.I therefore agree with Referee 1 in that this paper could be published
in xxx. " 赶紧按referees的建议修改了,11月就投了过去, 到了今年一月份收到第二
轮review, "Associate Editor 建议 The paper has improved a lot with the last
revision. However, both referees make a series of comments which need to be
addressed for the paper to be publishable.I recommend to give the author
another opportunity |
|
z***c
发帖数: 2959 | 45 凭你在这里灌水的那些个语气，你这个文章语气怎么样猜也猜得到。
你不要怪referee没有认真读，你要是前三段，第一页的东西没写好，
没有谁会愿意往下读。我在研究生院学懂的一个最重要的道理就是，
西方人的思维和中国人不一样，西方人希望在看到substance之前
就明白他为什么要去看，你要想方法勾引他去读，中国人的思维是先
别问为什么，看完你就会明白。这样导致很多文章第一页referee都
懒得读。
另外，你的数学如果不是很复杂，而现在结果如此，那你或者文字部分
大幅度修改，或者放弃。数学如果很复杂，那希望就更加渺小（数学复杂
的文章多数是靠作者的名气或者关系发出来的，无名作者玩复杂数学
只能靠运气撞到两个志同道合的referee，现在不是玩数学的年代）。
Referee说没有看懂，如果不是因为数学真的很复杂，那只是客气话，
千万别自以为自己就是对的。
利润最大化这个东西，critique的东西本来就很多，现在还能survive
下来，多少critique都作废了。你要继续批评，也得等其他人仔细思
考，大家都接受才算，你以为发表出来就终结了，too simple。
科斯定理这种东西，现在... 阅读全帖 |
|
e**l
发帖数: 21 | 46 杨小凯 was very good at promoting himself such as claiming Princeton was
going to give hime an offer. He has one idea in his whole life: corner
solution. His research achievement never past his coauthored JPE article.
Yang's writing on international trade is a joke as he did not understand the
basics.
发信人: znprc (Shrek), 信区: Economics
标 题: Re: 同学们，我确认我推翻新古典经济学了
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue May 10 09:07:32 2011, 美东)
凭你在这里灌水的那些个语气，你这个文章语气怎么样猜也猜得到。
你不要怪referee没有认真读，你要是前三段，第一页的东西没写好，
没有谁会愿意往下读。我在研究生院学懂的一个最重要... 阅读全帖 |
|
r******t
发帖数: 8967 | 47 Current status and history
Date Task description Deadline date/Status
20/05/2010 Original manuscript to referee In progress
16/04/2010 Original manuscript to referee In progress
16/04/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
16/04/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
Thanks, |
|
y***e
发帖数: 6082 | 48 这种情况实在是太正常不过了
Current status and history
Date Task description Deadline date/Status
20/05/2010 Original manuscript to referee In progress
16/04/2010 Original manuscript to referee In progress
16/04/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
16/04/2010 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report
Thanks, |
|
s*******n
发帖数: 1474 | 49 letter不收就改投main journal呗
如果发在main journal被狂引，则正好给了
先前letter的referee一个大嘴巴；以后介绍成果的时候还能说：
俺这个开创性工作当初投letter居然被referee说不够格。
最好当初那个referee还坐在下面，好好躁躁他，呵呵。
当然，referee放水的情况也很多。总的科研发表文章的系统有待改进。
未来应该是没有杂志之分，只有靠领域和文章citation。arXiv是
大势所趋。 |
|
