m******1 发帖数: 19713 | 1 Coakley: DOMA Interferes With Mass. Marriage
By Kenneth Harvey
MARTHA COAKLEY 202001 X390 (GETTY) | ADVOCATE.COM
On Thursday, Massachusetts attorney general Martha Coakley said the Defense
of Marriage Act, the law that defines marriage as a union between a man and
a woman, interferes with her state's right to regulate the institution, the
Associated Press reports.
Coakley is asking the federal government to bypass a trial and give a
summary judgment, which would rule the law unconstitutional wit | w****r 发帖数: 240 | 2 She is very cool
Defense
and
the
【在 m******1 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : Coakley: DOMA Interferes With Mass. Marriage : By Kenneth Harvey : MARTHA COAKLEY 202001 X390 (GETTY) | ADVOCATE.COM : On Thursday, Massachusetts attorney general Martha Coakley said the Defense : of Marriage Act, the law that defines marriage as a union between a man and : a woman, interferes with her state's right to regulate the institution, the : Associated Press reports. : Coakley is asking the federal government to bypass a trial and give a : summary judgment, which would rule the law unconstitutional wit
| g********d 发帖数: 4174 | | m******1 发帖数: 19713 | 4 我本来挺看好她的,可是自从她screw up了她的campaign以后,我就对她没底了 | k*****e 发帖数: 22013 | 5 这对repeal doma是利好吗?
该不会连mass marriage也一起被doma推翻了吧?
Defense
and
the
holding
【在 m******1 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 我本来挺看好她的,可是自从她screw up了她的campaign以后,我就对她没底了
| g********d 发帖数: 4174 | 6 这是不可能的。DOMA不承认STATE MARRIAGE已经是侵犯了state sovereignty。
【在 k*****e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 这对repeal doma是利好吗? : 该不会连mass marriage也一起被doma推翻了吧? : : Defense : and : the : holding
| m******8 发帖数: 2153 | | m******8 发帖数: 2153 | 8 加一段DOMA的历史
The Defense of Marriage Act was authored by then Georgia Representative Bob
Barr, then a Republican, and signed into law by President Bill Clinton, a
Democrat, on September 21, 1996, after moving through a legislative fast
track and overwhelming approval in both houses of the Republican-controlled
U.S. Congress. Its Congressional sponsors stated, "[T]he bill amends the U.S
. Code to make explicit what has been understood under federal law for over
200 years; that a marriage is the leg |
|