x*****g
发帖数: 3463 | 1 中国银行有样张，看看不就明白了吗？！
Forget about 'Correspondent of beneficiary's bank name & address'
不用填
Beneficiary's bank name & address, Beneficiary's bank Account number:
填你的银行的swift code + 你的银行的名称和地址
e.g. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank (Swift code: CHASUS33), 1 Chase Manhattan Plaza, New York, NY 10081, USA
Beneficiary's name and address, beneficiary's account number:
填你的银行帐号，你的名字和美国地址（跟在美国这边银行的记录一致）
下面还有汇款附言(Remittance Information)，可以注明你的routing number |
|
x**m
发帖数: 129 | 2 需要的信息如下：
收款人姓名 (Beneficiary Name)
收款人地址 (Beneficiary Address)
收款银行名称 (Beneficiary Bank)
收款银行地址 (Beneficiary Bank Address & Tel. No.)
收款人账号 (Beneficiary Account No.)
收款银行Swift Code (Swift Code)
收款银行ABA号码（就是Routing No.) |
|
az
发帖数: 16686 | 3 good question，这个我也正在办理，我的律师给了我一份详细的如何把assets转入
trust的instructions，我总结下，
* money market account， stock，mutual funds需要把owner改成trust的名字
* 401K是需要把配偶设成primary beneficiary, trust as contingent beneficiary
* personal property， joint checking，primary residence都不需要改
* life insurance，只需要cross ownership，因为我们还不是公民，把配偶设成
primary beneficiary，孩子, trust不需要写在beneficiary里，这个我也不是很sure
，可能跟我买的life insruance条款类型有点关系吧，最好咨询自己的律师
* 还有coverdell什么都不需要改
* IRA似乎是自己做owner，配偶是beneficiary，然后是trust
* 房子似乎是要把deed转一下，我们不打算做，所以没... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*******h
发帖数: 5065 | 4 Q: The memorandum provides an example of when a beneficiary, who is the sole
owner of the petitioner, would not establish a valid employer-employee
relationship. Are there any examples of when a beneficiary, who is the sole
owner of the petitioner, may be able to establish a valid employer-employee
relationship?
A. Yes. In footnotes 9 and 10 of the memorandum, USCIS indicates that
while a corporation may be a separate legal entity from its stockholders or
sole owner, it may be difficult for th... 阅读全帖 |
|
f********y
发帖数: 79 | 5 Please be aware of the change of primary applicant and service center
Interfile (relink) request letter:
May 01, 2010
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Nebraska Service Center
PO Box 82521
Lincoln, NE 68501-2521
Re: Request to transfer pending I-485s (that are currently associated
with EB-2 based I-140) to the newly approved EB-1 based I-140.
Petitioner/Beneficiary: xxx (A0x)
yyy (A0y)
Dear Immigration Officer,
We (xxx, husband; yyy, wife) would like to kindly a... 阅读全帖 |
|
p*******t
发帖数: 532 | 6 我的EB1A和几年前NIW都是自己DIY （NSC），没有RFE且很快批准。希望此帖对准备DIY的朋友有所帮助。秘诀是完全Follow USCIS的要求，远离律师！
在NSC辖区现在Efile意义可能不大了。USCIS在去年Kazarian案败诉后审理标准更趋统一了。Efile容易丢材料。好像最近TSC的RFE很多， IO很专业。以下所有依据都来自USCIS。
1。准备材料按最新USCIS的要求和IO评审Guideline， 要精读， 这里面对怎样给文章，Review， Contribution等都有明确界定：
http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Laws/Memoranda/i-140-evidence-pm-600
2。如何组织你的材料， 不要寄一大堆材料让IO找，要精炼，编号，目录，按PL顺序，并Highlight你想要让IO看的句子。以下这段更是明确了： 都用复印件，论文和引用文不用给全文！（为保险起见，我给了一篇自己的全文作样本）能省多少Page啊！
Q #5. When filing my Form I-140, how should I organize... 阅读全帖 |
|
f*******2
发帖数: 656 | 7 USCIS在10/3发出的通知，10/7我收到了RFE的邮件（EB1A和NIW）。我的律师应该也有
一份邮件copy。
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/32075977.html
EB1A的RFE复杂一些，先讨论一下这个NIW吧。
NIW的RFE俩页，大致说的俩问题吧：
1) the petitioner mush establish that the beneficiary has a past record of
specific prior achievement with some degree of influence on the field as a
whole. please submit evidence to establish that "the beneficiary's past
record" justifies projections of future benefit to the nation.
2) .. while the evidence shows the respect of the ... 阅读全帖 |
|
j*****a
发帖数: 489 | 8 RE: Request for Evidence for EB-1 petition for permanent residency under
the category of “Alien of Extraordinary Ability”
Petitioner:
Beneficiary:
File Number:
Classification Sought: 203 (b) (1) (A)
Type of Petition: I-140
Dear Immigration Officer
First, I would like to thank you for reviewing my application seriously.
Based on the Request for Evidence you sent to me on 那个时间, I could tell
that you have reviewed my application very carefully. I appreciate and
respect your professional atti... 阅读全帖 |
|
w****i
发帖数: 520 | 9 拿了个RFE，把内容发出来，同时也把自己response的strategy和detailed points都list 出来了；想征求一下大家的建议。
背景：
1) ME, Ph.D
2) 14 papers, 7 journals (6 1st authored) + 7 conference
3) 1 best conference paper in some axian country (not China)
4) 41 total citation + 5 email from industries and universities asking for details
5) 38 reviews
6) 4 letters from expert, + 2 letters from editors
7) conference chair and topic organizer for two years
claim: authorship, review, contribution
RFE: Passed authorship, review, NOT contribution
... 阅读全帖 |
|
V*********l
发帖数: 660 | 10 囧个囧，希望不是。。。。。。。。。敲木鱼的小猴子。
1.Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary’s
contribution to the field.
2.Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider
thebeneficiary’s work important.
3.Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary’s contributions of major significance.
4.Evidence that the beneficiary’s major significant contribution(s) has
provoked widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.... 阅读全帖 |
|
o*******u
发帖数: 242 | 11 先说说一个老案子Kazarian vs uscis ，肯定很多人讨论过了．
1. 官方定义
- Kazarian vs uscis sets forth a two-part approach where the evidence is
first counted and then considered in the context of a final merits
determination.
- While USCIS may have raised legitimate concerns about the significance
of
the evidence submitted to meet those two criteria, those concerns should
have been raised in a subsequent "final merits determination."
2. 一些例子
• to establish international recognition, and any evidence
submi... 阅读全帖 |
|
o*******u
发帖数: 242 | 12 有关技术性操作规程.
1. 所有材料应该在申请前准备好
- the petitioner must establish the beneficiary's eligibility as of the
date of filing
- A petitioner must establish eligibility at the time of filing; a petition
cannot be approved at a future date after the petitioner becomes eligible
under a new set of facts. the identity of the petitioner is a material issue
that may not be amended.
- doess not indicate that reference was aware of the beneficiary's original
contributions to the prior to the request that he rev... 阅读全帖 |
|
w*********s
发帖数: 8428 | 13 EB-1A, TSC, 前一段收到RFE，需要提供以下evidence证明contributions:
（1）Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary'S
contribution to the field.
（2）Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently
consider the beneficiary's work important.
（3）Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary's contributions of major significance.
（4）Evidence that the beneficiary's major significant contribution(s) has
provoked widespread public commentary in th... 阅读全帖 |
|
x****o
发帖数: 134 | 14 来自主题: Immigration版 - RFE求助 多谢回答。是这样的，officer建议了几样可以提交的东西，分别是
Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary's
contribution to the field.
Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider the
beneficiary's work important.
Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the beneficiary'
s contributions of major significance.
Evidence that the beneficiary's major significant contributions has provoked
widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.... 阅读全帖 |
|
M*****k
发帖数: 1556 | 15 上周三得到rfe的，自己的case比较弱，但是因为要跳槽，所以硬头皮PP了。 本人，米
国博士，专业 chemical/biochemical engineering, 现在藤校当千老。文章8篇，一作
7篇，引用< 100；中国专利4个，美国专利一个。Review 23次(除了几个次的，其他都
是行业顶尖杂志)。IO承认了我的 authorship 和 judge of other work.但是
contribution被否了。详细的评价如下：
This criterion has not been met because the evident submitted does not show
that your contributions are considered to be of major significance to the
field of endeavor. Many of the letters of support were from individuals who
already knew you, and the letter of support were... 阅读全帖 |
|
e****l
发帖数: 204 | 16 上个星期 EB1A 直接 PP 到 NSC，今天收到 来自 0002 的模板式 NOID。大伙能不能帮
我看看，该如何回复。同时也跟大家求个祝福！ 谢谢了。
USCIS has determined that the petitioner has provided sufficient
documentation to establish the beneficiary has met the following regulatory
criteria:
老三样
Establishing eligibility for the high level of expertise required for the
E11 immigrant classification is based on the beneficiary possessing:
* Sustained national or international acclaim.
In determining whether the beneficiary has enjoyed " sustained"
nati... 阅读全帖 |
|
p****v
发帖数: 89 | 17 我读了很多帖子，但还是不太明白USCIS关于140材料的准备要求。我的第一个问题是：
在他们的官方说明中，他们说没有必要附上文章的全文（It is not necessary to
send the full copy of a dissertation, thesis, or research paper written by
the alien beneficiary, or one in which the alien beneficiary's work has been
cited.），这可以理解，只要第一页就可以了。但在后面他加了一句： Include the
title page and the portion(s) that cite the alien's work and the "works
cited" or bibliography.是不是说要提供引文的第一页，提到被引用（我的工作）的
那一页，还有后面列的包含我的文章的references页。那这样每篇引文至少要3页。如
果我的citation是100的话岂不是就要300页纸给这个citation。
第二个问... 阅读全帖 |
|
f*******n
发帖数: 12623 | 18 没有听过要pic.s of petitioner for I485的。
如果是婚姻绿卡，需要：
1 pic of petitioner for I130
1 pic of beneficiary for I130
2 pics of beneficiary for I485
2 pics of beneficiary for I765
2 pics of beneficiary for I131
所以，总共7 pics of beneficiary。 |
|
t**********7
发帖数: 81 | 19 先说我的背景哈，估计是这个版上最弱最弱的了，没办法为了工作申了O-1, 然后等来
了rfe。
我的背景是生统小硕，5篇已经发表的文章，15个会议， 然后review有20个左右（因为
还在涨），citation很少，不到20 （我工作的这个领域其实很窄很窄，不是什么
cancer这种热门，发的文章又是epidemiology范围的）.然后媒体报道有一些，美国的
和国内的都有，美国这里的媒体报道有几篇是采访我大老板的，但是在文章的最后列出
了我的文章，国内的有提到我名字的，不过不是关于我本人的，只是关于研究结果的报
道。 另外有一些引用，是非典型的引用，比如CDC网站上有一个地方引用我的文章，用
来说明几个他们进行的study的大背景，然后几个那种医生用的网站，上面都是用来做
医生的reference的，类似教科书但是可以实时查询的，有引用我两篇文章。另外我做
的东西曾被大老板教课用，课件上有我的名字。
然后律师claim了authorship，review和contribution，媒体报道作为支持
contribution的证据。7封reference letter。
RFE承认了a... 阅读全帖 |
|
a****Q
发帖数: 83 | 20 同一个网页,下面一点有"a maximum of three year increments", 前提是有批准的I-
140,同时因为国家限制而暂时无法进一步申请绿卡的:
http://www.uscis.gov/ilink/docView/AFM/HTML/AFM/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-1
(10) Requests for an Extension of H 1B Status under the Provisions of
Section 104(c) of AC21 §104(c) for Aliens Subject to per Country Visa
Limitations. [Updated May 28, 2008]
USCIS interprets section 104(c) of AC21 as only applicable when an alien,
who is the beneficiary of an approved Form I 140 petition, is eligible to be
granted lawful permanen... 阅读全帖 |
|
p******y
发帖数: 236 | 21 Employer-Sponsored Petitions (PERM and EB-1b) – The 180-Day Rule
Changing employers or being laid off has a much greater effect on those who
have applied for immigration through EB-1B or PERM (EB2 and EB3), because
petitions in these preference categories require employer sponsorship.
Please note that, theoretically, the position offered to the beneficiary
alien in such petitions is a prospective position. The beneficiary alien
has up until the time when permanent residency is granted to take t... 阅读全帖 |
|
h****g
发帖数: 772 | 22 2014.2.28 下午，
收到RFE的传真，说是要offer letter
这个我早就没有了，是让HR重新写一份，然后用当年的时间吗？还是怎么弄？
有人说他们的RFE信上承认了几条，我这个什么都没有呀？
但是还有这样一段，不知道是不是只是他们的标准格式，还是要我提供更多的材料?
This is the petitioner's opportunity to articulate futher details or provide
additional evidence in regards to how the evidence submitted in the initial
filling or in response to this Request for Evidence establishes that the
beneficiary meets the requirements regarding the required high level of
expertise for the immigrant classification.
Establishing elig... 阅读全帖 |
|
h****g
发帖数: 772 | 23 2014.2.28 下午，
收到RFE的传真，说是要offer letter
这个我早就没有了，是让HR重新写一份，然后用当年的时间吗？还是怎么弄？
有人说他们的RFE信上承认了几条，我这个什么都没有呀？
但是还有这样一段，不知道是不是只是他们的标准格式，还是要我提供更多的材料?
This is the petitioner's opportunity to articulate futher details or provide
additional evidence in regards to how the evidence submitted in the initial
filling or in response to this Request for Evidence establishes that the
beneficiary meets the requirements regarding the required high level of
expertise for the immigrant classification.
Establishing elig... 阅读全帖 |
|
h****g
发帖数: 772 | 24 2014.2.28 下午，
收到RFE的传真，说是要offer letter
这个我早就没有了，是让HR重新写一份，然后用当年的时间吗？还是怎么弄？
有人说他们的RFE信上承认了几条，我这个什么都没有呀？
但是还有这样一段，不知道是不是只是他们的标准格式，还是要我提供更多的材料?
This is the petitioner's opportunity to articulate futher details or provide
additional evidence in regards to how the evidence submitted in the initial
filling or in response to this Request for Evidence establishes that the
beneficiary meets the requirements regarding the required high level of
expertise for the immigrant classification.
Establishing elig... 阅读全帖 |
|
s*********n
发帖数: 937 | 25 要relink的话，去做一个service request，一般by mail，但听说TSC有一email (
E**********[email protected]), 专门做relink用: email
subject “I-485 multiple I-140s”, and provide A-numbers.
都可以试试。Good luck！ 下面附上 relink的模板，希望有帮助。
Please be aware of the change of primary applicant and service center
Interfile (relink) request letter:
May 01, 2099
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Nebraska Service Center
PO Box 82521
Lincoln, NE 68501-2521
Re: Request to transfer pending I-485s (that are currently associated
with EB-2 based... 阅读全帖 |
|
b*******i
发帖数: 594 | 26 Update: 今天收到正式的Denial letter了，仍然是否认Contribution。
关键部分如下：
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. In the RFE , USCIS had suggested the
following objective documentary evidence of the significance of the
beneficiary's contribution to the field:
--Evidence that the beneficiary's major significant contribution(s) has
provoked widespread public commentary in t... 阅读全帖 |
|
n******e
发帖数: 203 | 27 USCIS关于Contribution的论证要求如下：
a.Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary’s
contribution to the field;
b.Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider
the beneficiary’s work important;
c. Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary’s contributions of major significance;
d.Evidence that the beneficiary’s major significant contribution(s) has
provoked widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely ci... 阅读全帖 |
|
a****c
发帖数: 121 | 28 Update：又仔细核对了下律师准备的材料和IO的信
律师材料的PL分3块，第一部分讨论推荐信，第二部分讨论文章加一部分引用，第三部
分讨论review
然后IO的信，先说203(b)(1)(B)的第一，然后列6条criteria，然后讲了two-part
analysis.
之后开始承认the petitioner has provided sufficient documentation to
establish the beneficiary has met the following regulatory criteria:，
authorship和judge work of others
但是说failed to establish eligibility for the following criteria：
Published material in professional publications written by others about the
alien's work in the academic field. Such material shall in... 阅读全帖 |
|
g**********y
发帖数: 269 | 29 大家好，
我5月5号交了EB1B petition，今天收到了律师给我的intent to deny notice。下面简
要介绍我的背景：
1) 2013年12月PhD毕业，bioinformatics方向。
2) 五篇一作文章，都是三个期刊，两个会议，都在我们领域排名前三。
3) 39个引用。引用我的文章里面很多都是用到我的tool,或者将我的tool build到他们
的pipeline。其中包括一个Science和The ISME journal by Nature。
4）6封推荐信，一个来自日本，两个美国，一个德国，一个法国，一个中国。包括一个
中科院&美国科学院院士。信里面推荐的都很strong。
信里面主要question的是：
1) Published material in professional publications written by others about
the alien's work in the academic field. Such material shall include the
title, date, and author of ... 阅读全帖 |
|
g**********y
发帖数: 269 | 30 大家好！一开始准备EB1B的时候没有经验，推荐信也没有针对性写。另外case也比较弱
，五篇一作文章，39个引用（包括自引），审稿应该足够。结果收到NSC 0002的NOID：
1) Published material in professional publications written by others about
the alien's work in the academic field. Such material shall include the
title, date, and author of the material, and any necessary translation;
This criterion has not been met because the evidence does not indicate that
the materials were published material that related to the beneficiary's work
in their academic field. Articles which... 阅读全帖 |
|
j******n
发帖数: 697 | 31 大家好，
过去30天看见好多EB1B的战友被0002和0214 NOID，我也预感不好，今天公司律师告诉
我收到NOID(其实已经过去好几天了），算了下只有20天出头的时间准备材料。
申请的背景如下：
1. PhD，业内大公司R&D Engineer，分析化学背景，偏冷的仪器领域。
2. 一共7篇journal，其中5篇一作。3篇1作和另外2篇不是一作发表在Analytical
Chemistry上（领域top期刊）。
3. 推荐信7封，一封来自导师，一封合作教授，一封公司研发部VP，其他4封是
independent，分别来自美国，英国（2封），瑞典。
4. 提交的时候引用77个，现在89个。
5. 会议oral presentation 4次，poster 1次。
申请的情况：
公司一直用Fragomen的律师，申请过程中感觉水平不行，我自己早期把关了RL（现在看
来是没写好没突出重点）和后期自己按版上的完全重写了PL（自己感觉写的还可以，感
觉IO没看）。
律师的PL claim了4项，只有7页。我后来删减到了3项，扩孔到15页，涵盖很多大家常
用的方式。
1. Authorsh... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*****8
发帖数: 369 | 32 这些日子经过puma还有大狮子化学家，以及各位大神的指点，收益匪浅。这里献丑帮你
分析一下，诸位要是有不同观点，欢迎继续批评指教！
用绿油油的话说，虽然都是模板，但是确实满篇都是答案啊。
The support letters go on to describe the research work of the
beneficiary in an attempt to demonstrate the major significance of his
contributions. Support letters alone are insufficient to meet this criteria
without corroborating evidence to back up what was said in the letters.
你的推荐信肯定有问题，律师按照模板搞的，只是大篇幅介绍了你的工作，但是没有证
据证明你的contribution是major significance
The beneficiary has stated that his ground
break... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*****8
发帖数: 369 | 33 这些日子经过puma还有大狮子化学家，以及各位大神的指点，收益匪浅。这里献丑帮你
分析一下，诸位要是有不同观点，欢迎继续批评指教！
用绿油油的话说，虽然都是模板，但是确实满篇都是答案啊。
The support letters go on to describe the research work of the
beneficiary in an attempt to demonstrate the major significance of his
contributions. Support letters alone are insufficient to meet this criteria
without corroborating evidence to back up what was said in the letters.
你的推荐信肯定有问题，律师按照模板搞的，只是大篇幅介绍了你的工作，但是没有证
据证明你的contribution是major significance
The beneficiary has stated that his ground
break... 阅读全帖 |
|
f*******n
发帖数: 140 | 34 在EB1a材料的基础上自己DIY了O-1, O-1提交后一周追加pp的第二天就被RFE了。现在
opt
已经过期了，就等着O-1能批呢，真是着急。。。请大家帮忙看看，给点主意，万分感
谢！
背景：7英文+4中文（一作7篇），IF最高6+
citation: 135+ (google+CNKI)
review: 31 （IF最高6+）
5封推荐信，其中3封独立 （美国，荷兰，新加坡）
RFE了3样：1. request for translation :我的中文文章有英文abstract，就没有翻译
全文了，难道全文也要翻译？中文的引用我都翻译公证过了。
2. 不会贴图，只好打出来
“ General Requirements for All O Nonimmigrant Petitions
In general, petitions seeking O nonimmigrant classification must include:
- copies of contracts;
- A description of the competition(s),... 阅读全帖 |
|
o**i
发帖数: 1165 | 35 兼问
EB1A 485 pending 180天内可以换工作但不转行么? 包子答谢
刚刚收到 485的receipt notice 上面有句话
"
As a reminder, you may request to change employer under INA 204(j) if you
Form I-485 Adjustment application has been pending for at least 180 days and
your underlying Form I-140 is approved or is still pending. In order to do
so, you should supplement the form I-485 record of proceeding with
documentation relating to the new job offer that forms the basis of the INA
204(j) portability request."
言外之意 是不是
1. 180天以内不许换工作!!!
2... 阅读全帖 |
|
j****i
发帖数: 5 | 36 本人背景：geoscience方向，美国硕士博士毕业。现在在休斯顿一家石油公司工作快满
四年。一共5篇文章，其中4篇一作。会议海报4篇。Google Scholar总citation是99（
少的可怜）。审稿27篇，在一个Journal任副主编。6篇推荐信，四篇独立两篇来自自己
的导师。四篇独立推荐信中都引了我的文章，三个来自美国，一个来自澳大利亚。
Timeline是
RD 11/24/17
PP 12/11/17
RFE 12/18/17 by Officer# XM 1265
主要质疑contributions: (1) the evidence submitted does not show that the
beneficiary's contribution are considered to be major significance in the
field of endeavor; (2) the evidence doesn't establish the petitioner's
finding have been utilized as the basis fo... 阅读全帖 |
|
发帖数: 1 | 37 背景：pharmaceutical sciences (药化方向)，国内PhD，来美博后第四年。
一共17篇文章，9篇一作一篇通讯；专利五个，3个已授权。提交时citation是150+，大
部分来自一作的文章。审稿80+。6封推荐信，四封独立两封非独立，来自美国x2葡萄牙
x2英国x1中国x1。
12月29号140/PP的材料寄到TSC，1月11号收到了# XM 1122的RFE。认可了authorship和
judge，承认有contribution，但不够major significant。
主要的要求补充以下证据：
1. Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary
’s contribution to the field;
2. Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently
consider the beneficiary’s work import;
3. Testimony an... 阅读全帖 |
|
n***s
发帖数: 10056 | 38 "485(绿卡)：排期日2009年7月15日"
This part really confuses me. LZ applied GC when in school under F1? Then
h1b is the only way.
To LZ: you can find cap-exempt h1b job and get h1b immediately (PP 2 weeks).
Then ask current company to file a concurrent h1b. This h1b would be cap-
exempt as well. Remember, it has to be concurrent h1b. You can quit the job
AFTER getting the second h1b approval. Then on April 1st 2013 or April 1st
2014, ask you company file h1b for cap and when you get it approved, next
Octob... 阅读全帖 |
|
a*****8
发帖数: 2689 | 39 Page Two:
While it is not uncommon to file EB-2 and EB-3 I-140 petitions
simultaneously based on the same labor certification, it is more common to
“upgrade” the beneficiary from EB-3 to EB-2 by filing a subsequent I-140
after the employee acquires additional experience and/or education, and DOL
approves a labor certification filed by the same or a different employer.
Pursuant to 8 CFR
§204.5(e), where there are multiple approved petitions, the beneficiary
retains the earliest priority date. Tho... 阅读全帖 |
|
a*****8
发帖数: 2689 | 40 Page Two:
While it is not uncommon to file EB-2 and EB-3 I-140 petitions
simultaneously based on the same labor certification, it is more common to
“upgrade” the beneficiary from EB-3 to EB-2 by filing a subsequent I-140
after the employee acquires additional experience and/or education, and DOL
approves a labor certification filed by the same or a different employer.
Pursuant to 8 CFR
§204.5(e), where there are multiple approved petitions, the beneficiary
retains the earliest priority date. Tho... 阅读全帖 |
|
m*******o
发帖数: 625 | 41 我以前收藏的，版上应该还能找到。
-----------------------------------
May 01, 2010
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Nebraska Service Center
PO Box 82521
Lincoln, NE 68501-2521
Re: Request to transfer pending I-485s (that are currently associated
with EB-2 based I-140) to the newly approved EB-1 based I-140.
Petitioner/Beneficiary: xxx (A0x)
yyy (A0y)
Dear Immigration Officer,
We (xxx, husband; yyy, wife) would like to kindly ask for your help to
transfer our pending I-485s (cur... 阅读全帖 |
|
o********0
发帖数: 2145 | 42 USCIS 在征集合法移民这块改革的意见，各位有空去发表些意见哈！
Dear Stakeholder,
On March 19, 2015, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) hosted
a listening session on business-focused immigration enhancements. Such
enhancements are part of the November 2014 executive actions to modernize,
improve, and clarify employment-based immigrant and nonimmigrant visa
programs to grow our economy and create jobs.
We continue to encourage stakeholders to submit comments to Public.
[email protected]
/* */ in response ... 阅读全帖 |
|
c******k
发帖数: 1089 | 43 Dear Stakeholder,
On March 19, 2015, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) hosted
a listening session on business-focused immigration enhancements. Such
enhancements are part of the November 2014 executive actions to modernize,
improve, and clarify employment-based immigrant and nonimmigrant visa
programs to grow our economy and create jobs.
We continue to encourage stakeholders to submit comments to Public.
[email protected]
/* */ in response to the specific questions that USC... 阅读全帖 |
|
B********n
发帖数: 12753 | 44 Dear Stakeholder,
On March 19, 2015, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) hosted
a listening session on business-focused immigration enhancements. Such
enhancements are part of the November 2014 executive actions to modernize,
improve, and clarify employment-based immigrant and nonimmigrant visa
programs to grow our economy and create jobs.
We continue to encourage stakeholders to submit comments to Public.
[email protected]
/* */ in response to the specific questions that USC... 阅读全帖 |
|
z******y
发帖数: 969 | 45 If you wish to comment, you may do so by sending your thoughts to Public.
[email protected]
/* */ They are moving forward with administrative
changes and this is your opportunity to make your voice heard.
What are the most important policy and operational changes that would
streamline and improve the process of employment-based beneficiaries’
applying for adjustment of status to that of a lawful permanent resident
while in the United States?
a. What are some ideas for modernizing and impro... 阅读全帖 |
|
c*******7
发帖数: 2506 | 46 说的很清楚，要提交 “ INA 204 (j)portability request"
USCIS网站也有更详细的问答:
Q #8. How can an alien beneficiary submit a request to change employers
under INA 204(j)?
A. An alien beneficiary may supplement the Form I-485 record of proceeding
with documentation relating to the new job offer that forms the basis of the
INA §204(j) portability request. The alien beneficiary or the Form G-28
representative for the Form I-485 application must send a letter from the
new intended permanent employer specifying the job... 阅读全帖 |
|
m*****1
发帖数: 1464 | 47 对，你是对的。H1B I-129里包含了CHANGE OF STATUS, 我又看了遍I-129的
INSTRUCTION的第六页有这么一段说明，所以应该是自动的，不需要额外激活的。
For all classifications, if a beneficiary is seeking a change of status or
extension of stay, evidence of maintenance of
status must be included with the new petition. If the beneficiary is
employed in the United States, the petitioner may
submit copies of the beneficiary’s last 2 pay stubs, Form W-2, and other
relevant evidence, as well as a copy of the
beneficiary’s Form I-94, passport, travel document,... 阅读全帖 |
|
o**i
发帖数: 1165 | 48 【 以下文字转载自 Immigration 讨论区 】
发信人: oboi (鳌拜), 信区: Immigration
标 题: 亲们EB1A的485 receipt上 有这句 204(j)么?
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Jan 8 23:30:55 2016, 美东)
兼问
EB1A 485 pending 180天内可以换工作但不转行么? 包子答谢
刚刚收到 485的receipt notice 上面有句话
"
As a reminder, you may request to change employer under INA 204(j) if you
Form I-485 Adjustment application has been pending for at least 180 days and
your underlying Form I-140 is approved or is still pending. In order to do
so, you should supplement the form I-485 record of pro... 阅读全帖 |
|
S*******s
发帖数: 10098 | 49 Trust 是一种牵涉3方的private agreement， 这三方是：
（1）你，信托发起人Grantor（也叫Trust Maker，Trustor或Settlor）；
（2）受托人Trutee；
（3）信托资产受益人beneficiary（通常是子女）。
很多人误为信托仅仅是一个corporation 或一个小公司， 或者是一个在州里注册的， 或
者走法律手续的合法实体/legal Entity. 不管什么种类， 总的来说信托好像是你（发
起人Trust Maker）写的一本 “规则书”，一本关于如何管理你的钱的规则书, 而
Trutee是你挑选出来帮你执行规则的执行人/经理人。受托人Trutee可以是一个银行或
公司，也可以是 一个年满18岁的个人。有时候，Trutee可以是发起人Trust Maker本人
。
作为信托发起人 Trust Maker/Grantor，你(the grantor)把财产交付给这个信托名下
之后， 由你去指定你想要的执行规则， 然后Trutee会按照你预设的规则条框去管理/
这个信托里头的钱，按你的规定去distribute和照顾受益人（ben... 阅读全帖 |
|
d*****j
发帖数: 1192 | 50 If You Are Married
If you are married, federal law says your spouse is automatically the
beneficiary of your 401k or other pension plan - period. You should still
fill out the beneficiary form with your spouse's name, for the record.
If you want to name a beneficiary who is someone other than your spouse,
your spouse must sign a waiver. The waiver MUST be in writing.
For example, you might be separated from your spouse - not divorced - and
want to name a new beneficiary. Even if your intended be... 阅读全帖 |
|
